不同随机化任务的神经关联。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Maja Guseva;Carsten Bogler;Carsten Allefeld;Ece Büşra Ziya;John-Dylan Haynes
{"title":"不同随机化任务的神经关联。","authors":"Maja Guseva;Carsten Bogler;Carsten Allefeld;Ece Büşra Ziya;John-Dylan Haynes","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In some cases, when we are making decisions, the available choices can appear to be equivalent. When this happens, our choices appear not to be constrained by external factors and, instead, we can believe to be selecting “randomly.” Furthermore, randomness is sometimes even explicitly required by task conditions such as in random sequence generation tasks. This is a challenging task that involves the coordination of multiple cognitive processes, which can include the inhibition of habitual choice patterns and monitoring of the running choice sequence. It has been shown that random choices are strongly influenced by the way they are instructed. This raises the question whether the brain mechanisms underlying random selection also differ between different task instructions. To assess this, we measured brain activity while participants were engaging in three different variations of a sequence generation task: On the basis of previous work, participants were instructed to either (1) “generate a random sequence of choices,” (2) “simulate a fair coin toss,” or (3) “choose freely.” Our results reveal a consistent frontoparietal activation pattern that is shared across all tasks. Specifically, increased activity was observed in bilateral inferior and right middle frontal gyrus, left pre-SMA, bilateral inferior parietal lobules, and portions of anterior insular cortex in both hemispheres. Activity in the mental coin toss condition was higher in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left (pre-) SMA, a portion of right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral superior parietal lobules, and bilateral anterior insula. In addition, our multivariate analysis revealed a distinct region in the right frontal pole to be predictive of the outcome of choices, but only when randomness was explicitly instructed. These results emphasize that different randomization tasks involve both shared and unique neural mechanisms. Thus, even seemingly similar randomization behavior can be produced by different neural pathways.","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"37 3","pages":"621-640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural Correlates of Different Randomization Tasks\",\"authors\":\"Maja Guseva;Carsten Bogler;Carsten Allefeld;Ece Büşra Ziya;John-Dylan Haynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/jocn_a_02280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In some cases, when we are making decisions, the available choices can appear to be equivalent. When this happens, our choices appear not to be constrained by external factors and, instead, we can believe to be selecting “randomly.” Furthermore, randomness is sometimes even explicitly required by task conditions such as in random sequence generation tasks. This is a challenging task that involves the coordination of multiple cognitive processes, which can include the inhibition of habitual choice patterns and monitoring of the running choice sequence. It has been shown that random choices are strongly influenced by the way they are instructed. This raises the question whether the brain mechanisms underlying random selection also differ between different task instructions. To assess this, we measured brain activity while participants were engaging in three different variations of a sequence generation task: On the basis of previous work, participants were instructed to either (1) “generate a random sequence of choices,” (2) “simulate a fair coin toss,” or (3) “choose freely.” Our results reveal a consistent frontoparietal activation pattern that is shared across all tasks. Specifically, increased activity was observed in bilateral inferior and right middle frontal gyrus, left pre-SMA, bilateral inferior parietal lobules, and portions of anterior insular cortex in both hemispheres. Activity in the mental coin toss condition was higher in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left (pre-) SMA, a portion of right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral superior parietal lobules, and bilateral anterior insula. In addition, our multivariate analysis revealed a distinct region in the right frontal pole to be predictive of the outcome of choices, but only when randomness was explicitly instructed. These results emphasize that different randomization tasks involve both shared and unique neural mechanisms. Thus, even seemingly similar randomization behavior can be produced by different neural pathways.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"621-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10904975/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10904975/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在某些情况下,当我们做决定时,可用的选择似乎是相同的。当这种情况发生时,我们的选择似乎不受外部因素的约束,相反,我们可以相信是“随机”选择。此外,有时任务条件甚至明确要求随机性,例如在随机序列生成任务中。这是一项具有挑战性的任务,涉及多个认知过程的协调,其中包括对习惯性选择模式的抑制和对运行选择序列的监控。研究表明,随机选择受到指导方式的强烈影响。这就提出了一个问题:在不同的任务指令之间,随机选择背后的大脑机制是否也有所不同?为了评估这一点,我们测量了参与者参与三种不同的序列生成任务时的大脑活动:在之前工作的基础上,参与者被指示(1)“生成一个随机的选择序列,”(2)“模拟公平的抛硬币,”或者(3)“自由选择”。我们的研究结果揭示了在所有任务中共享的一致的额顶叶激活模式。具体来说,双侧额叶下回和右侧额叶中回、左侧sma前回、双侧顶叶下小叶和两个半球的部分前岛叶皮层活动增加。抛硬币时,右侧背外侧前额叶皮层、左侧(前)SMA、部分右侧额下回、双侧顶叶上小叶和双侧脑岛前部的活动较高。此外,我们的多变量分析显示,右侧额极有一个独特的区域可以预测选择的结果,但只有在明确指示随机性的情况下。这些结果强调不同的随机化任务涉及共享和独特的神经机制。因此,即使看似相似的随机化行为也可能由不同的神经通路产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural Correlates of Different Randomization Tasks
In some cases, when we are making decisions, the available choices can appear to be equivalent. When this happens, our choices appear not to be constrained by external factors and, instead, we can believe to be selecting “randomly.” Furthermore, randomness is sometimes even explicitly required by task conditions such as in random sequence generation tasks. This is a challenging task that involves the coordination of multiple cognitive processes, which can include the inhibition of habitual choice patterns and monitoring of the running choice sequence. It has been shown that random choices are strongly influenced by the way they are instructed. This raises the question whether the brain mechanisms underlying random selection also differ between different task instructions. To assess this, we measured brain activity while participants were engaging in three different variations of a sequence generation task: On the basis of previous work, participants were instructed to either (1) “generate a random sequence of choices,” (2) “simulate a fair coin toss,” or (3) “choose freely.” Our results reveal a consistent frontoparietal activation pattern that is shared across all tasks. Specifically, increased activity was observed in bilateral inferior and right middle frontal gyrus, left pre-SMA, bilateral inferior parietal lobules, and portions of anterior insular cortex in both hemispheres. Activity in the mental coin toss condition was higher in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left (pre-) SMA, a portion of right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral superior parietal lobules, and bilateral anterior insula. In addition, our multivariate analysis revealed a distinct region in the right frontal pole to be predictive of the outcome of choices, but only when randomness was explicitly instructed. These results emphasize that different randomization tasks involve both shared and unique neural mechanisms. Thus, even seemingly similar randomization behavior can be produced by different neural pathways.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信