Guillaume Le Sant, Antoine Frouin, Lucie Gachet, Lilian Lacourpaille, Antoine Nordez, Emmanuelle Bataille, Aurélie Gaultier, Jean-Pascal Fournier
{"title":"术前治疗对前交叉韧带损伤的医疗保健利用和重返工作岗位的影响:使用法国医疗保健数据库的现实世界研究。","authors":"Guillaume Le Sant, Antoine Frouin, Lucie Gachet, Lilian Lacourpaille, Antoine Nordez, Emmanuelle Bataille, Aurélie Gaultier, Jean-Pascal Fournier","doi":"10.1080/00913847.2024.2435256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare use and the number of days of sickness benefits between people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury who received physiotherapy before and after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who received physiotherapy after ACLR only. Secondary aim: to measure the association between the volume of preoperative healthcare and post-ACLR recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each individual's care pathway was extracted from a section of the French National Health Data System (SNDS) database (province: Pays de La Loire). The database was queried for the codes related to sickness benefits and healthcare utilization, including physiotherapy, medical and paramedical visits and procedures, medication, and medical equipment provided up to six months before and eighteen months after the ACLR. (Registry/number: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the timing of physiotherapy, two subcohorts were created from the database: 'prehabilitation' (<i>n</i> = 513) for those receiving physiotherapy before and after ACLR; 'no prehabilitation' (<i>n</i> = 630) for those only receiving physiotherapy after ACLR. Before ACLR, healthcare use was higher for the 'prehabilitation' group, including the number of medical visits (3.9 ± 2.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.9 univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001), analgesia (mild opioids 60.4% vs. 49.8% univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001), dispensing of medical equipment (85.0% vs. 68.9% univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001) and sickness benefit days (52.7 ± 45.6 days vs. 33.2 ± 35.8 days, univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001). After ACLR, the 'prehabilitation' group underwent a higher number of physiotherapy sessions (46.8 ± 21.9 sessions vs 35.8 ± 19.0 sessions, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but had a similar number of sickness benefit days (94.7 ± 77.8 days vs 87.1 ± 69.9 days, <i>p</i> = 0.092). From the multivariate analysis (<i>n</i> = 1143): age, comorbidities, the preoperative number of sickness benefit days, and the number of physiotherapy sessions before ACLR explained 24% of the variance in days of sickness benefits after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation was associated with higher healthcare utilization before and after ACLR. Prehabilitation, and other preoperative variables, explained only a part of the number of days of sickness benefits after ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51268,"journal":{"name":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of preoperative treatment on healthcare utilization and return to work for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a real-world study using the French healthcare database.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Le Sant, Antoine Frouin, Lucie Gachet, Lilian Lacourpaille, Antoine Nordez, Emmanuelle Bataille, Aurélie Gaultier, Jean-Pascal Fournier\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00913847.2024.2435256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare healthcare use and the number of days of sickness benefits between people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury who received physiotherapy before and after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who received physiotherapy after ACLR only. Secondary aim: to measure the association between the volume of preoperative healthcare and post-ACLR recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each individual's care pathway was extracted from a section of the French National Health Data System (SNDS) database (province: Pays de La Loire). The database was queried for the codes related to sickness benefits and healthcare utilization, including physiotherapy, medical and paramedical visits and procedures, medication, and medical equipment provided up to six months before and eighteen months after the ACLR. (Registry/number: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the timing of physiotherapy, two subcohorts were created from the database: 'prehabilitation' (<i>n</i> = 513) for those receiving physiotherapy before and after ACLR; 'no prehabilitation' (<i>n</i> = 630) for those only receiving physiotherapy after ACLR. Before ACLR, healthcare use was higher for the 'prehabilitation' group, including the number of medical visits (3.9 ± 2.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.9 univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001), analgesia (mild opioids 60.4% vs. 49.8% univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001), dispensing of medical equipment (85.0% vs. 68.9% univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001) and sickness benefit days (52.7 ± 45.6 days vs. 33.2 ± 35.8 days, univariate <i>p</i> < 0.001). After ACLR, the 'prehabilitation' group underwent a higher number of physiotherapy sessions (46.8 ± 21.9 sessions vs 35.8 ± 19.0 sessions, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but had a similar number of sickness benefit days (94.7 ± 77.8 days vs 87.1 ± 69.9 days, <i>p</i> = 0.092). From the multivariate analysis (<i>n</i> = 1143): age, comorbidities, the preoperative number of sickness benefit days, and the number of physiotherapy sessions before ACLR explained 24% of the variance in days of sickness benefits after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation was associated with higher healthcare utilization before and after ACLR. Prehabilitation, and other preoperative variables, explained only a part of the number of days of sickness benefits after ACLR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physician and Sportsmedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2024.2435256\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician and Sportsmedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2024.2435256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者在ACL重建(ACLR)前后接受物理治疗和仅在ACLR后接受物理治疗的患者的医疗保健使用和疾病福利天数。次要目的:测量术前保健量与aclr术后恢复之间的关系。方法:从法国国家卫生数据系统(SNDS)数据库(省:Pays de La Loire)中提取每个个体的护理路径。向数据库查询了与疾病津贴和医疗保健利用有关的代码,包括物理治疗、医疗和辅助医疗访问和程序、药物以及在ACLR之前6个月和之后18个月提供的医疗设备。(注册/编号:ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719).Results:根据物理治疗的时间,从数据库中创建了两个亚队列:“预康复”(n = 513),用于ACLR之前和之后接受物理治疗的患者;ACLR后仅接受物理治疗的患者“无康复”(n = 630)。在ACLR之前,“康复前”组的医疗保健使用率更高,包括就诊次数(单变量p = 3.9±2.3 vs. 3.0±1.9 p = 0.092)。从多变量分析(n = 1143)来看:年龄、合并症、术前疾病受益天数和ACLR之前的物理治疗次数解释了ACLR后疾病受益天数差异的24%。结论:术前康复与ACLR前后较高的医疗保健利用率相关。康复和其他术前变量只能解释ACLR后疾病福利天数的一部分。
Effects of preoperative treatment on healthcare utilization and return to work for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a real-world study using the French healthcare database.
Objective: To compare healthcare use and the number of days of sickness benefits between people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury who received physiotherapy before and after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and those who received physiotherapy after ACLR only. Secondary aim: to measure the association between the volume of preoperative healthcare and post-ACLR recovery.
Methods: Each individual's care pathway was extracted from a section of the French National Health Data System (SNDS) database (province: Pays de La Loire). The database was queried for the codes related to sickness benefits and healthcare utilization, including physiotherapy, medical and paramedical visits and procedures, medication, and medical equipment provided up to six months before and eighteen months after the ACLR. (Registry/number: ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05737719).
Results: Based on the timing of physiotherapy, two subcohorts were created from the database: 'prehabilitation' (n = 513) for those receiving physiotherapy before and after ACLR; 'no prehabilitation' (n = 630) for those only receiving physiotherapy after ACLR. Before ACLR, healthcare use was higher for the 'prehabilitation' group, including the number of medical visits (3.9 ± 2.3 vs. 3.0 ± 1.9 univariate p < 0.001), analgesia (mild opioids 60.4% vs. 49.8% univariate p < 0.001), dispensing of medical equipment (85.0% vs. 68.9% univariate p < 0.001) and sickness benefit days (52.7 ± 45.6 days vs. 33.2 ± 35.8 days, univariate p < 0.001). After ACLR, the 'prehabilitation' group underwent a higher number of physiotherapy sessions (46.8 ± 21.9 sessions vs 35.8 ± 19.0 sessions, p < 0.001) but had a similar number of sickness benefit days (94.7 ± 77.8 days vs 87.1 ± 69.9 days, p = 0.092). From the multivariate analysis (n = 1143): age, comorbidities, the preoperative number of sickness benefit days, and the number of physiotherapy sessions before ACLR explained 24% of the variance in days of sickness benefits after ACLR.
Conclusion: Prehabilitation was associated with higher healthcare utilization before and after ACLR. Prehabilitation, and other preoperative variables, explained only a part of the number of days of sickness benefits after ACLR.
期刊介绍:
The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-reviewed, clinically oriented publication for primary care physicians. We examine the latest drug discoveries to advance treatment and recovery, and take into account the medical aspects of exercise therapy for a given condition. We cover the latest primary care-focused treatments serving the needs of our active patient population, and assess the limits these treatments govern in stabilization and recovery.
The Physician and Sportsmedicine is a peer-to-peer method of communicating the latest research to aid primary care physicians’ advancement in methods of care and treatment. We routinely cover such topics as: managing chronic disease, surgical techniques in preventing and managing injuries, the latest advancements in treatments for helping patients lose weight, and related exercise and nutrition topics that can impact the patient during recovery and modification.