低频血糖自我监测对老年2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_20_23
Mohammad Sahebkar, Atousa Ariafar, Farnush Attarzadeh, Najmeh Rahimi, Susan J Malkemes, Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani, Abdolghader Assarroudi
{"title":"低频血糖自我监测对老年2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响。","authors":"Mohammad Sahebkar, Atousa Ariafar, Farnush Attarzadeh, Najmeh Rahimi, Susan J Malkemes, Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani, Abdolghader Assarroudi","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_20_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing the frequency of self-monitoring of blood sugar, due to needle phobia, pain, stress, and costs associated with the procedure, can improve patient compliance and quality of life, provided that adequate blood sugar control is maintained. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-frequency blood glucose self-monitoring (LFBGSM) on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1<sub>C</sub>) levels among older adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), treated with or without insulin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was conducted on 121 older adults with T2DM in Sabzevar, Iran, between 2018 and 2020. Initially, subjects were stratified based on the type of treatment (with or without insulin) and then randomly assigned to intervention (LFBGSM) and control (no blood glucose self-monitoring [no-BGSM]) groups. HbA1<sub>C</sub> levels were measured at the beginning of the study and 3 months later for all study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants treated with and without insulin was 64.3 ± 9.60 and 64.7 ± 5.01 years, respectively. The ANCOVA test revealed a significant difference in the mean HbA1<sub>C</sub> levels among the four groups 3 months postintervention (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The HbA1<sub>C</sub> scores significantly decreased in the LFBGSM groups and increased in the no-BGSM groups at 3 months postintervention (insulin/LFBGSM, insulin/no-BGSM, noninsulin/LFBGSM, and noninsulin/no-BGSM: 7.74 ± 0.76, 8.34 ± 1.53, 7.70 ± 0.75, and 8.14 ± 1.11, respectively) compared to baseline (8.25 ± 0.67, 8.03 ± 0.64, 8.08 ± 0.69, and 7.83 ± 0.74, respectively). The least significant difference <i>post</i> <i>hoc</i> tests showed significant differences between specific groups, emphasizing subtle responses to interventions (<i>P</i> values ranging from 0.001 to 0.929).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest a significant reduction in HbA1<sub>C</sub> scores within the LFBGSM groups, while a discernible increase is observed in the no-BGSM groups over the 3 months. These findings underscore the efficacy of the interventions and emphasize the crucial role of personalized approaches in optimizing glycemic control for individuals with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"29 ","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of low-frequency blood glucose self-monitoring on glycosylated hemoglobin levels among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Sahebkar, Atousa Ariafar, Farnush Attarzadeh, Najmeh Rahimi, Susan J Malkemes, Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani, Abdolghader Assarroudi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrms.jrms_20_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing the frequency of self-monitoring of blood sugar, due to needle phobia, pain, stress, and costs associated with the procedure, can improve patient compliance and quality of life, provided that adequate blood sugar control is maintained. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-frequency blood glucose self-monitoring (LFBGSM) on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1<sub>C</sub>) levels among older adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), treated with or without insulin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was conducted on 121 older adults with T2DM in Sabzevar, Iran, between 2018 and 2020. Initially, subjects were stratified based on the type of treatment (with or without insulin) and then randomly assigned to intervention (LFBGSM) and control (no blood glucose self-monitoring [no-BGSM]) groups. HbA1<sub>C</sub> levels were measured at the beginning of the study and 3 months later for all study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants treated with and without insulin was 64.3 ± 9.60 and 64.7 ± 5.01 years, respectively. The ANCOVA test revealed a significant difference in the mean HbA1<sub>C</sub> levels among the four groups 3 months postintervention (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The HbA1<sub>C</sub> scores significantly decreased in the LFBGSM groups and increased in the no-BGSM groups at 3 months postintervention (insulin/LFBGSM, insulin/no-BGSM, noninsulin/LFBGSM, and noninsulin/no-BGSM: 7.74 ± 0.76, 8.34 ± 1.53, 7.70 ± 0.75, and 8.14 ± 1.11, respectively) compared to baseline (8.25 ± 0.67, 8.03 ± 0.64, 8.08 ± 0.69, and 7.83 ± 0.74, respectively). The least significant difference <i>post</i> <i>hoc</i> tests showed significant differences between specific groups, emphasizing subtle responses to interventions (<i>P</i> values ranging from 0.001 to 0.929).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest a significant reduction in HbA1<sub>C</sub> scores within the LFBGSM groups, while a discernible increase is observed in the no-BGSM groups over the 3 months. These findings underscore the efficacy of the interventions and emphasize the crucial role of personalized approaches in optimizing glycemic control for individuals with diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_20_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_20_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:减少自我监测血糖的频率,由于针头恐惧,疼痛,压力和与手术相关的费用,可以提高患者的依从性和生活质量,前提是保持适当的血糖控制。本研究旨在评估低频血糖自我监测(LFBGSM)对老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者(接受或不接受胰岛素治疗)糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)水平的影响。材料和方法:该随机对照试验采用平行设计,于2018年至2020年在伊朗Sabzevar对121名老年T2DM患者进行了研究。最初,受试者根据治疗类型(使用或不使用胰岛素)进行分层,然后随机分配到干预组(LFBGSM)和对照组(无血糖自我监测[无bgsm])。在研究开始时和3个月后对所有研究组的HbA1C水平进行测量。结果:胰岛素治疗组和非胰岛素治疗组的平均年龄分别为64.3±9.60岁和64.7±5.01岁。ANCOVA检验显示,干预后3个月,四组患者的平均HbA1C水平有显著差异(P < 0.001)。干预后3个月,与基线(8.25±0.67,8.03±0.64,8.08±0.69,7.83±0.74)相比,LFBGSM组(胰岛素/LFBGSM,胰岛素/无bgsm,非胰岛素/LFBGSM,非胰岛素/无bgsm)的HbA1C评分显著降低,无bgsm组(分别为7.74±0.76,8.34±1.53,7.70±0.75,8.14±1.11)的HbA1C评分显著升高。最不显著差异事后检验显示特定组之间存在显著差异,强调对干预措施的微妙反应(P值范围为0.001至0.929)。结论:研究结果表明,在3个月内,LFBGSM组的HbA1C评分显著降低,而非bgsm组的HbA1C评分明显升高。这些发现强调了干预措施的有效性,并强调了个性化方法在优化糖尿病患者血糖控制中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of low-frequency blood glucose self-monitoring on glycosylated hemoglobin levels among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Background: Reducing the frequency of self-monitoring of blood sugar, due to needle phobia, pain, stress, and costs associated with the procedure, can improve patient compliance and quality of life, provided that adequate blood sugar control is maintained. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-frequency blood glucose self-monitoring (LFBGSM) on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels among older adults living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), treated with or without insulin.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was conducted on 121 older adults with T2DM in Sabzevar, Iran, between 2018 and 2020. Initially, subjects were stratified based on the type of treatment (with or without insulin) and then randomly assigned to intervention (LFBGSM) and control (no blood glucose self-monitoring [no-BGSM]) groups. HbA1C levels were measured at the beginning of the study and 3 months later for all study groups.

Results: The mean age of participants treated with and without insulin was 64.3 ± 9.60 and 64.7 ± 5.01 years, respectively. The ANCOVA test revealed a significant difference in the mean HbA1C levels among the four groups 3 months postintervention (P < 0.001). The HbA1C scores significantly decreased in the LFBGSM groups and increased in the no-BGSM groups at 3 months postintervention (insulin/LFBGSM, insulin/no-BGSM, noninsulin/LFBGSM, and noninsulin/no-BGSM: 7.74 ± 0.76, 8.34 ± 1.53, 7.70 ± 0.75, and 8.14 ± 1.11, respectively) compared to baseline (8.25 ± 0.67, 8.03 ± 0.64, 8.08 ± 0.69, and 7.83 ± 0.74, respectively). The least significant difference post hoc tests showed significant differences between specific groups, emphasizing subtle responses to interventions (P values ranging from 0.001 to 0.929).

Conclusion: Findings suggest a significant reduction in HbA1C scores within the LFBGSM groups, while a discernible increase is observed in the no-BGSM groups over the 3 months. These findings underscore the efficacy of the interventions and emphasize the crucial role of personalized approaches in optimizing glycemic control for individuals with diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信