基于时间的前瞻记忆预测社区居住的老年人的功能能力。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michelle Gereau Mora, Libby A DesRuisseaux, Yana Suchy
{"title":"基于时间的前瞻记忆预测社区居住的老年人的功能能力。","authors":"Michelle Gereau Mora, Libby A DesRuisseaux, Yana Suchy","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate appraisal of one's own abilities (i.e., insight) is necessary for appropriate compensatory behaviors and sustained independence during aging. Although insight is often purported to be related to executive functioning (EF), nuanced understanding of the cognitive correlates of insight for functional abilities among nondemented older adults is lacking. Because insight shares neuroanatomic underpinnings with time-based prospective memory (PM), the present study examined the contributions of time-based PM, beyond event-based PM and other potential cognitive confounds (i.e., episodic memory, time estimation, and EF), in predicting insight into one's own performance on instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) among community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A group of 88 nondemented, community-dwelling older adults completed performance-based measures of time- and event-based PM, episodic memory, time estimation, and EF, as well as IADL tasks followed by self-appraisals of their own IADL performance as indices of insight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time-based PM was moderately-to-strongly associated with insight, beyond event-based PM, time estimation, and episodic memory [<i>F</i>(1,83) = 11.58, <i>p</i> = .001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .122], as well as beyond EF and demographic covariates [<i>F</i>(1,79) = 10.72, <i>p</i> = .002, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .119].Specifically, older adults who performed more poorly on a time-based PM task overestimated the efficiency of their own IADL performance to a greater extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that nondemented older adults with poorer time-based PM may be more prone to inaccurately appraising their functional abilities and that this vulnerability may not be adequately captured by traditional EF measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Based prospective memory predicts insight into functional abilities among community-dwelling older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Gereau Mora, Libby A DesRuisseaux, Yana Suchy\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617724000614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate appraisal of one's own abilities (i.e., insight) is necessary for appropriate compensatory behaviors and sustained independence during aging. Although insight is often purported to be related to executive functioning (EF), nuanced understanding of the cognitive correlates of insight for functional abilities among nondemented older adults is lacking. Because insight shares neuroanatomic underpinnings with time-based prospective memory (PM), the present study examined the contributions of time-based PM, beyond event-based PM and other potential cognitive confounds (i.e., episodic memory, time estimation, and EF), in predicting insight into one's own performance on instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) among community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A group of 88 nondemented, community-dwelling older adults completed performance-based measures of time- and event-based PM, episodic memory, time estimation, and EF, as well as IADL tasks followed by self-appraisals of their own IADL performance as indices of insight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time-based PM was moderately-to-strongly associated with insight, beyond event-based PM, time estimation, and episodic memory [<i>F</i>(1,83) = 11.58, <i>p</i> = .001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .122], as well as beyond EF and demographic covariates [<i>F</i>(1,79) = 10.72, <i>p</i> = .002, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .119].Specifically, older adults who performed more poorly on a time-based PM task overestimated the efficiency of their own IADL performance to a greater extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that nondemented older adults with poorer time-based PM may be more prone to inaccurately appraising their functional abilities and that this vulnerability may not be adequately captured by traditional EF measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确评估自己的能力(即洞察力)是在衰老过程中适当的代偿行为和持续的独立性所必需的。虽然洞察力通常被认为与执行功能(EF)有关,但对洞察力与非痴呆老年人功能能力的认知相关性的细致理解是缺乏的。由于洞察力与基于时间的前瞻记忆(PM)具有相同的神经解剖学基础,本研究考察了基于时间的前瞻记忆的贡献,超越了基于事件的前瞻记忆和其他潜在的认知混淆(即情景记忆、时间估计和EF),在预测社区居住老年人对自己日常生活工具活动(IADLs)表现的洞察力方面。方法:一组88名无痴呆的社区老年人完成了基于时间和事件的PM,情景记忆,时间估计和EF的绩效测量,以及IADL任务,然后对他们自己的IADL绩效进行自我评估作为洞察力指标。结果:基于时间的PM与洞察力有中等到强烈的相关性,超越了基于事件的PM、时间估计和情景记忆[F(1,83) = 11.58, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.122],也超越了EF和人口统计学协变量[F(1,79) = 10.72, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.119]。具体来说,在基于时间的PM任务中表现较差的老年人在更大程度上高估了他们自己的IADL表现的效率。结论:研究结果表明,时间基础PM较差的非痴呆老年人可能更容易不准确地评估其功能能力,而传统的EF测量方法可能无法充分捕捉到这种脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time-Based prospective memory predicts insight into functional abilities among community-dwelling older adults.

Objective: Accurate appraisal of one's own abilities (i.e., insight) is necessary for appropriate compensatory behaviors and sustained independence during aging. Although insight is often purported to be related to executive functioning (EF), nuanced understanding of the cognitive correlates of insight for functional abilities among nondemented older adults is lacking. Because insight shares neuroanatomic underpinnings with time-based prospective memory (PM), the present study examined the contributions of time-based PM, beyond event-based PM and other potential cognitive confounds (i.e., episodic memory, time estimation, and EF), in predicting insight into one's own performance on instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) among community-dwelling older adults.

Method: A group of 88 nondemented, community-dwelling older adults completed performance-based measures of time- and event-based PM, episodic memory, time estimation, and EF, as well as IADL tasks followed by self-appraisals of their own IADL performance as indices of insight.

Results: Time-based PM was moderately-to-strongly associated with insight, beyond event-based PM, time estimation, and episodic memory [F(1,83) = 11.58, p = .001, ηp2 = .122], as well as beyond EF and demographic covariates [F(1,79) = 10.72, p = .002, ηp2 = .119].Specifically, older adults who performed more poorly on a time-based PM task overestimated the efficiency of their own IADL performance to a greater extent.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that nondemented older adults with poorer time-based PM may be more prone to inaccurately appraising their functional abilities and that this vulnerability may not be adequately captured by traditional EF measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信