Yannick Rebours, L Aigle, G Agard, J Godron, G Michoud
{"title":"2013 - 2020年军事跳伞训练与空降作战损伤对比回顾性研究。","authors":"Yannick Rebours, L Aigle, G Agard, J Godron, G Michoud","doi":"10.1136/military-2023-002604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>French paratroopers have been deployed during airborne operations for nearly a century. Parachute operations have increased since the start of <i>Operations Serval</i> and <i>Barkhane</i> in the Sahelo-Saharan strip. These military operations allow paratroopers to be dropped behind enemy lines. Our primary objective was to compare injuries sustained during airborne operations and training. Our secondary objective was to compare serious injuries sustained during airborne operations and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentric comparative retrospective study of military parachuting injuries sustained during training and airborne operations from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. Parachuting injuries included in our study came from the French Army Injury Register.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 91 injuries (among 90 wounded), including one death, were recorded during airborne operations and 2744 injuries (among 2516 wounded), including one death, were recorded during training. Proportionally, injuries were more common during airborne operations (3.3%) than training (0.3%), especially during military freefall operations. Operational static-line jumps are more associated with serious injuries than training ones (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.62). Compared with training, operational jumps caused proportionally more knee injuries (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.51, p=0.008) but fewer upper limb injuries (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.74). A physician and/or nurse medically supported 83.3% of airborne operations. Data collection initially differed between paratrooper units until the French Army introduced a harmonised collection tool (Register of Parachuting Incidents (<i>Fiche de Recueil Accident en Parachute</i>)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights a significantly increased injury rate during airborne operations, especially serious ones, likely due to the cumulative effect of well-known parachuting risk factors (eg, unknown or high wind speed, unknown landing ground type, combat load and night drop), justifying surveillance by qualified parachuting health staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":48485,"journal":{"name":"Bmj Military Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative retrospective study of injuries during military parachuting training and airborne operations from 2013 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Rebours, L Aigle, G Agard, J Godron, G Michoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/military-2023-002604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>French paratroopers have been deployed during airborne operations for nearly a century. Parachute operations have increased since the start of <i>Operations Serval</i> and <i>Barkhane</i> in the Sahelo-Saharan strip. These military operations allow paratroopers to be dropped behind enemy lines. Our primary objective was to compare injuries sustained during airborne operations and training. Our secondary objective was to compare serious injuries sustained during airborne operations and training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentric comparative retrospective study of military parachuting injuries sustained during training and airborne operations from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. Parachuting injuries included in our study came from the French Army Injury Register.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 91 injuries (among 90 wounded), including one death, were recorded during airborne operations and 2744 injuries (among 2516 wounded), including one death, were recorded during training. Proportionally, injuries were more common during airborne operations (3.3%) than training (0.3%), especially during military freefall operations. Operational static-line jumps are more associated with serious injuries than training ones (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.62). Compared with training, operational jumps caused proportionally more knee injuries (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.51, p=0.008) but fewer upper limb injuries (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.74). A physician and/or nurse medically supported 83.3% of airborne operations. Data collection initially differed between paratrooper units until the French Army introduced a harmonised collection tool (Register of Parachuting Incidents (<i>Fiche de Recueil Accident en Parachute</i>)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights a significantly increased injury rate during airborne operations, especially serious ones, likely due to the cumulative effect of well-known parachuting risk factors (eg, unknown or high wind speed, unknown landing ground type, combat load and night drop), justifying surveillance by qualified parachuting health staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bmj Military Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bmj Military Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2023-002604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:近一个世纪以来,法国伞兵一直被部署在空降作战中。自从萨赫勒-撒哈拉地带的几次和巴克哈内行动开始以来,降落伞行动有所增加。这些军事行动允许伞兵空投到敌后。我们的主要目标是比较空降作战和训练期间的受伤情况。我们的第二个目标是比较在空降行动和训练中遭受的严重伤害。方法:我们对2013年1月1日至2020年12月31日在训练和空降行动中发生的军事跳伞损伤进行了多中心比较回顾性研究。我们研究中的跳伞伤害来自法国陆军伤害登记册。结果:在研究期间,在空降行动中记录了91例受伤(90名伤者中),包括1例死亡;在训练中记录了2744例受伤(2516名伤者中),包括1例死亡。在比例上,伤害在空降行动(3.3%)比训练(0.3%)更常见,尤其是在军事自由落体行动中。与训练跳相比,操作静态线跳与严重伤害的关联更大(OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.79至5.62)。与训练相比,操作性跳跃造成的膝关节损伤比例更高(OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.65至4.51,p=0.008),但上肢损伤比例更低(OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17至0.74)。医生和/或护士为83.3%的空降行动提供医疗支助。数据收集最初在伞兵部队之间是不同的,直到法国军队引入了统一的收集工具(跳伞事故登记册(Fiche de Recueil Accident en Parachute))。结论:我们的研究强调了空降行动中受伤率的显著增加,特别是严重的,可能是由于众所周知的跳伞危险因素(例如未知或高风速、未知着陆地面类型、战斗负荷和夜间空投)的累积效应,有必要由合格的跳伞卫生人员进行监测。
Comparative retrospective study of injuries during military parachuting training and airborne operations from 2013 to 2020.
Introduction: French paratroopers have been deployed during airborne operations for nearly a century. Parachute operations have increased since the start of Operations Serval and Barkhane in the Sahelo-Saharan strip. These military operations allow paratroopers to be dropped behind enemy lines. Our primary objective was to compare injuries sustained during airborne operations and training. Our secondary objective was to compare serious injuries sustained during airborne operations and training.
Methods: We conducted a multicentric comparative retrospective study of military parachuting injuries sustained during training and airborne operations from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020. Parachuting injuries included in our study came from the French Army Injury Register.
Results: During the study period, 91 injuries (among 90 wounded), including one death, were recorded during airborne operations and 2744 injuries (among 2516 wounded), including one death, were recorded during training. Proportionally, injuries were more common during airborne operations (3.3%) than training (0.3%), especially during military freefall operations. Operational static-line jumps are more associated with serious injuries than training ones (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.79 to 5.62). Compared with training, operational jumps caused proportionally more knee injuries (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.65 to 4.51, p=0.008) but fewer upper limb injuries (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.74). A physician and/or nurse medically supported 83.3% of airborne operations. Data collection initially differed between paratrooper units until the French Army introduced a harmonised collection tool (Register of Parachuting Incidents (Fiche de Recueil Accident en Parachute)).
Conclusion: Our study highlights a significantly increased injury rate during airborne operations, especially serious ones, likely due to the cumulative effect of well-known parachuting risk factors (eg, unknown or high wind speed, unknown landing ground type, combat load and night drop), justifying surveillance by qualified parachuting health staff.