预测24小时眼压变化的机器学习模型:比较研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Chen Ranran, Lei Jinming, Liao Yujie, Jin Yiping, Wang Xue, Li Hong, Bi Yanlong, Zhu Haohao
{"title":"预测24小时眼压变化的机器学习模型:比较研究。","authors":"Chen Ranran, Lei Jinming, Liao Yujie, Jin Yiping, Wang Xue, Li Hong, Bi Yanlong, Zhu Haohao","doi":"10.12659/MSM.945483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Predicting 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations is crucial for enhancing glaucoma management. Traditional methods of measuring 24-hour IOP fluctuations are complex and present certain limitations. The present study leverages machine learning techniques to forecast 24-hour IOP fluctuations based on daytime IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS A binary method was used to classify 24-hour IOP fluctuations as either >8 mmHg or £8 mmHg. Data were collected from 24-hour IOP monitoring, including 22 different features. Feature selection involved the chi-square test and point-biserial correlation, leading to the establishment of 4 subsets with significance levels of P<1, P<0.1, P<0.05, and P<0.025. Five binary classification machine learning algorithms were used to construct the model. Model performance was assessed by comparing accuracy, specificity, 10-fold cross-validation, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR). The model with the highest performance was selected, and feature importance was assessed using Shapley additive explanations.   RESULTS In the subset of features where P<0.05, all models performed better than those in the other subsets, with XGBoost standing out the most. The XGBoost algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.886, a specificity of 0.972, a 10-fold cross-validation of 0.872, a precision of 0.857, a sensitivity of 0.585, and an F1 score of 0.696. Additionally, it obtained an AUC of 0.890 and an AUCPR of 0.794. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the predictive capabilities of machine learning algorithms in forecasting 24-hour IOP fluctuations. The exceptional performance of the XGBoost algorithm in predicting IOP fluctuations underscores its significance for future research and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"30 ","pages":"e945483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Models for Predicting 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Changes: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Ranran, Lei Jinming, Liao Yujie, Jin Yiping, Wang Xue, Li Hong, Bi Yanlong, Zhu Haohao\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.945483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND Predicting 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations is crucial for enhancing glaucoma management. Traditional methods of measuring 24-hour IOP fluctuations are complex and present certain limitations. The present study leverages machine learning techniques to forecast 24-hour IOP fluctuations based on daytime IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS A binary method was used to classify 24-hour IOP fluctuations as either >8 mmHg or £8 mmHg. Data were collected from 24-hour IOP monitoring, including 22 different features. Feature selection involved the chi-square test and point-biserial correlation, leading to the establishment of 4 subsets with significance levels of P<1, P<0.1, P<0.05, and P<0.025. Five binary classification machine learning algorithms were used to construct the model. Model performance was assessed by comparing accuracy, specificity, 10-fold cross-validation, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR). The model with the highest performance was selected, and feature importance was assessed using Shapley additive explanations.   RESULTS In the subset of features where P<0.05, all models performed better than those in the other subsets, with XGBoost standing out the most. The XGBoost algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.886, a specificity of 0.972, a 10-fold cross-validation of 0.872, a precision of 0.857, a sensitivity of 0.585, and an F1 score of 0.696. Additionally, it obtained an AUC of 0.890 and an AUCPR of 0.794. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the predictive capabilities of machine learning algorithms in forecasting 24-hour IOP fluctuations. The exceptional performance of the XGBoost algorithm in predicting IOP fluctuations underscores its significance for future research and clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"e945483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624606/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.945483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测24小时眼内压(IOP)波动对加强青光眼治疗至关重要。测量24小时眼压波动的传统方法很复杂,存在一定的局限性。目前的研究利用机器学习技术来预测基于白天IOP测量的24小时IOP波动。材料和方法采用二元方法将24小时眼压波动分为bbb8mmhg或£8mmhg。24小时IOP监测数据,包括22个不同特征。特征选择涉及卡方检验和点双列相关,从而建立了4个显著性水平为P的子集
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning Models for Predicting 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Changes: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND Predicting 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations is crucial for enhancing glaucoma management. Traditional methods of measuring 24-hour IOP fluctuations are complex and present certain limitations. The present study leverages machine learning techniques to forecast 24-hour IOP fluctuations based on daytime IOP measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS A binary method was used to classify 24-hour IOP fluctuations as either >8 mmHg or £8 mmHg. Data were collected from 24-hour IOP monitoring, including 22 different features. Feature selection involved the chi-square test and point-biserial correlation, leading to the establishment of 4 subsets with significance levels of P<1, P<0.1, P<0.05, and P<0.025. Five binary classification machine learning algorithms were used to construct the model. Model performance was assessed by comparing accuracy, specificity, 10-fold cross-validation, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC), and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUCPR). The model with the highest performance was selected, and feature importance was assessed using Shapley additive explanations.   RESULTS In the subset of features where P<0.05, all models performed better than those in the other subsets, with XGBoost standing out the most. The XGBoost algorithm achieved an accuracy of 0.886, a specificity of 0.972, a 10-fold cross-validation of 0.872, a precision of 0.857, a sensitivity of 0.585, and an F1 score of 0.696. Additionally, it obtained an AUC of 0.890 and an AUCPR of 0.794. CONCLUSIONS Our study illustrates the predictive capabilities of machine learning algorithms in forecasting 24-hour IOP fluctuations. The exceptional performance of the XGBoost algorithm in predicting IOP fluctuations underscores its significance for future research and clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信