Julia Thomas, Jennifer Carrano, Rebecca L Schacht, Marc Fishman, Kevin Wenzel
{"title":"缺乏预谋在不良童年经历与物质使用障碍住院治疗个体创伤后应激障碍之间起中介作用。","authors":"Julia Thomas, Jennifer Carrano, Rebecca L Schacht, Marc Fishman, Kevin Wenzel","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2024.2433768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) are associated with increased vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but not everyone who experiences ACEs develops PTSD. Impulsivity has gained interest as a potential mediator between ACEs and PTSD, given that both PTSD and ACEs have been closely related to impulsivity. However, less is known about the relationship within the context of substance use disorder (SUD), a population highly vulnerable to co-occurring PTSD. This study examined whether impulsivity mediates the relationship between ACEs and PTSD symptoms in adults seeking residential treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). <b>Methods:</b> <i>N</i> = 134 consenting adults in residential treatment for SUD completed questionnaires measuring impulsivity (UPPS-P), ACEs (ACEs Scale), and PTSD symptoms (PCL-5). Regression models tested our hypotheses that ACEs would predict PTSD symptoms and that impulsivity would mediate this relationship. <b>Results:</b> Two-thirds of participants met the PCL-5 score threshold for a provisional diagnosis of PTSD. ACEs score and impulsivity were significant direct predictors of PTSD symptoms (coeff = 2.23, <i>p</i> < .001; coeff = 1.03, <i>p</i> < .001). Among UPPS-P subconstructs, only lack of premeditation emerged as a partial mediator (z = 2.14, <i>p</i> = 0.032). <b>Conclusions:</b> Individuals with SUD experience adverse and traumatic events at alarming rates and are at increased risk for PTSD. Our mediation finding suggests that impulsivity and especially lack of premeditation may be clinically relevant in the development or maintenance of PTSD symptoms among individuals with SUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lack of Premeditation Mediates the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals in Residential Treatment for Substance Use Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Thomas, Jennifer Carrano, Rebecca L Schacht, Marc Fishman, Kevin Wenzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15504263.2024.2433768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) are associated with increased vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but not everyone who experiences ACEs develops PTSD. Impulsivity has gained interest as a potential mediator between ACEs and PTSD, given that both PTSD and ACEs have been closely related to impulsivity. However, less is known about the relationship within the context of substance use disorder (SUD), a population highly vulnerable to co-occurring PTSD. This study examined whether impulsivity mediates the relationship between ACEs and PTSD symptoms in adults seeking residential treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). <b>Methods:</b> <i>N</i> = 134 consenting adults in residential treatment for SUD completed questionnaires measuring impulsivity (UPPS-P), ACEs (ACEs Scale), and PTSD symptoms (PCL-5). Regression models tested our hypotheses that ACEs would predict PTSD symptoms and that impulsivity would mediate this relationship. <b>Results:</b> Two-thirds of participants met the PCL-5 score threshold for a provisional diagnosis of PTSD. ACEs score and impulsivity were significant direct predictors of PTSD symptoms (coeff = 2.23, <i>p</i> < .001; coeff = 1.03, <i>p</i> < .001). Among UPPS-P subconstructs, only lack of premeditation emerged as a partial mediator (z = 2.14, <i>p</i> = 0.032). <b>Conclusions:</b> Individuals with SUD experience adverse and traumatic events at alarming rates and are at increased risk for PTSD. Our mediation finding suggests that impulsivity and especially lack of premeditation may be clinically relevant in the development or maintenance of PTSD symptoms among individuals with SUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dual Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2024.2433768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2024.2433768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:童年不良事件(ace)与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的易损性增加有关,但并非所有经历过ace的人都会患上PTSD。鉴于创伤后应激障碍和ace都与冲动性密切相关,冲动性作为ace和PTSD之间的潜在中介已引起人们的兴趣。然而,在物质使用障碍(SUD)的背景下,人们对这种关系知之甚少,这是一个极易发生PTSD的人群。本研究探讨冲动性是否在寻求物质使用障碍(SUD)住院治疗的成人的ace和PTSD症状之间起中介作用。方法:N = 134名自愿接受SUD住院治疗的成年人完成了冲动性(UPPS-P)、ace (ace量表)和PTSD症状(PCL-5)的问卷调查。回归模型检验了我们的假设,即ace可以预测PTSD症状,冲动可以调节这种关系。结果:三分之二的参与者达到了临时诊断PTSD的PCL-5评分阈值。ace评分和冲动性是PTSD症状的显著直接预测因子(coeff = 2.23, p < 0.001;Coeff = 1.03, p < .001)。在UPPS-P亚构中,只有缺乏预谋是部分中介(z = 2.14, p = 0.032)。结论:患有SUD的个体经历不良和创伤性事件的比率惊人,并且患PTSD的风险增加。我们的调解发现表明,冲动,特别是缺乏预谋可能在临床上与患有SUD的个体的PTSD症状的发展或维持有关。
Lack of Premeditation Mediates the Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals in Residential Treatment for Substance Use Disorder.
Objective: Adverse Childhood Events (ACEs) are associated with increased vulnerability for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but not everyone who experiences ACEs develops PTSD. Impulsivity has gained interest as a potential mediator between ACEs and PTSD, given that both PTSD and ACEs have been closely related to impulsivity. However, less is known about the relationship within the context of substance use disorder (SUD), a population highly vulnerable to co-occurring PTSD. This study examined whether impulsivity mediates the relationship between ACEs and PTSD symptoms in adults seeking residential treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). Methods:N = 134 consenting adults in residential treatment for SUD completed questionnaires measuring impulsivity (UPPS-P), ACEs (ACEs Scale), and PTSD symptoms (PCL-5). Regression models tested our hypotheses that ACEs would predict PTSD symptoms and that impulsivity would mediate this relationship. Results: Two-thirds of participants met the PCL-5 score threshold for a provisional diagnosis of PTSD. ACEs score and impulsivity were significant direct predictors of PTSD symptoms (coeff = 2.23, p < .001; coeff = 1.03, p < .001). Among UPPS-P subconstructs, only lack of premeditation emerged as a partial mediator (z = 2.14, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Individuals with SUD experience adverse and traumatic events at alarming rates and are at increased risk for PTSD. Our mediation finding suggests that impulsivity and especially lack of premeditation may be clinically relevant in the development or maintenance of PTSD symptoms among individuals with SUD.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.