加强对老年退伍军人的创伤知情护理:创伤实践和课程需求的临床医生观点。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kelly A O'Malley, Stella T Park, Maya Tadmor, Katherine Kemp, Anica Pless Kaiser, Hannah M Bashian, Lola Baird, Jennifer A Moye
{"title":"加强对老年退伍军人的创伤知情护理:创伤实践和课程需求的临床医生观点。","authors":"Kelly A O'Malley, Stella T Park, Maya Tadmor, Katherine Kemp, Anica Pless Kaiser, Hannah M Bashian, Lola Baird, Jennifer A Moye","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2024.2433205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma-informed care is mandated in long-term care settings in the United States; however, little is known about clinicians' perspectives on trauma-informed care educational needs. To address this gap, we gathered responses to closed- and open-ended questions from two samples who work with older adults: (1) hospice and palliative care staff (<i>N</i> = 279) completing a recurring bi-annual survey, and (2) clinicians from diverse settings (<i>N</i> = 242) responding to live polling during a Veterans Affairs (VA) national webinar. Results of qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that both routinely screened for trauma history or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Hospice and palliative care clinicians reported the least confidence in <i>recognizing</i> trauma and <i>responding</i> to trauma disclosures, while one-fifth of VA clinicians reported hesitancy to assess trauma history. Hospice and palliative staff were more confident in their knowledge of effects of trauma and applying the trauma-informed principle of \"<i>respect</i>.\" Both groups expressed interest in additional training, specifically videos, case examples, toolkits, and attention to organizational and personal impacts of working with those with PTSD, aligning with SAMHSA recommendations. Findings identified focal areas for trauma-informed care curriculum; however, future work should fully assess current practices and gaps to inform practical, case-based, and self-efficacy focused curriculum development.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing trauma-informed care for older veterans: clinician perspectives on trauma practices and curricular needs.\",\"authors\":\"Kelly A O'Malley, Stella T Park, Maya Tadmor, Katherine Kemp, Anica Pless Kaiser, Hannah M Bashian, Lola Baird, Jennifer A Moye\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2024.2433205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Trauma-informed care is mandated in long-term care settings in the United States; however, little is known about clinicians' perspectives on trauma-informed care educational needs. To address this gap, we gathered responses to closed- and open-ended questions from two samples who work with older adults: (1) hospice and palliative care staff (<i>N</i> = 279) completing a recurring bi-annual survey, and (2) clinicians from diverse settings (<i>N</i> = 242) responding to live polling during a Veterans Affairs (VA) national webinar. Results of qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that both routinely screened for trauma history or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Hospice and palliative care clinicians reported the least confidence in <i>recognizing</i> trauma and <i>responding</i> to trauma disclosures, while one-fifth of VA clinicians reported hesitancy to assess trauma history. Hospice and palliative staff were more confident in their knowledge of effects of trauma and applying the trauma-informed principle of \\\"<i>respect</i>.\\\" Both groups expressed interest in additional training, specifically videos, case examples, toolkits, and attention to organizational and personal impacts of working with those with PTSD, aligning with SAMHSA recommendations. Findings identified focal areas for trauma-informed care curriculum; however, future work should fully assess current practices and gaps to inform practical, case-based, and self-efficacy focused curriculum development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2433205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2433205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,创伤知情护理在长期护理机构中是强制性的;然而,关于临床医生对创伤知情护理教育需求的看法知之甚少。为了解决这一差距,我们从两个与老年人一起工作的样本中收集了对封闭式和开放式问题的回答:(1)临终关怀和姑息治疗工作人员(N = 279)完成了两年一次的定期调查,(2)来自不同环境的临床医生(N = 242)在退伍军人事务(VA)全国网络研讨会期间回应了现场民意调查。定性和定量分析的结果显示,他们都进行了创伤史或创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的常规筛查。临终关怀和姑息治疗临床医生报告说,在识别创伤和应对创伤披露方面最缺乏信心,而退伍军人事务部的临床医生中有五分之一报告说,在评估创伤史方面犹豫不决。安宁疗护和缓和疗护人员对他们对创伤影响的了解和运用创伤知情原则“尊重”更有信心。两个小组都对额外的培训感兴趣,特别是视频、案例、工具包,并关注与创伤后应激障碍患者一起工作的组织和个人影响,与SAMHSA的建议保持一致。研究结果确定了创伤知情护理课程的重点领域;然而,未来的工作应该充分评估当前的做法和差距,以告知实际的、基于案例的和以自我效能为重点的课程开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing trauma-informed care for older veterans: clinician perspectives on trauma practices and curricular needs.

Trauma-informed care is mandated in long-term care settings in the United States; however, little is known about clinicians' perspectives on trauma-informed care educational needs. To address this gap, we gathered responses to closed- and open-ended questions from two samples who work with older adults: (1) hospice and palliative care staff (N = 279) completing a recurring bi-annual survey, and (2) clinicians from diverse settings (N = 242) responding to live polling during a Veterans Affairs (VA) national webinar. Results of qualitative and quantitative analysis revealed that both routinely screened for trauma history or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Hospice and palliative care clinicians reported the least confidence in recognizing trauma and responding to trauma disclosures, while one-fifth of VA clinicians reported hesitancy to assess trauma history. Hospice and palliative staff were more confident in their knowledge of effects of trauma and applying the trauma-informed principle of "respect." Both groups expressed interest in additional training, specifically videos, case examples, toolkits, and attention to organizational and personal impacts of working with those with PTSD, aligning with SAMHSA recommendations. Findings identified focal areas for trauma-informed care curriculum; however, future work should fully assess current practices and gaps to inform practical, case-based, and self-efficacy focused curriculum development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信