定位螺钉在微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折中的作用。

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.4055/cios23272
Jong-Hun Ji, Ho-Seung Jeong, Ban-Suk Ko, Hwang-Yong You, Hyun-Sik Jun
{"title":"定位螺钉在微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨骨干骨折中的作用。","authors":"Jong-Hun Ji, Ho-Seung Jeong, Ban-Suk Ko, Hwang-Yong You, Hyun-Sik Jun","doi":"10.4055/cios23272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares the difference in the clinical and radiologic outcomes when minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique is performed with or without using a positional screw in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to January 2021, a retrospective study was conducted on a total of 63 patients who underwent the MIPO technique for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. We divided these patients into 2 groups: in group I, patients underwent MIPO without a positional screw; in group II, patients underwent MIPO with a positional screw. We compared functional outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California at Los Angeles score, Simple Shoulder Test, range of motion before and after surgery, operation time, blood loss, and complications. And we compared radiologic outcomes including pre- and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral displacement of the fracture and union time on plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average patient age was 64.6 ± 15.1 years (range, 25-88 years). Group I consisted of 30 patients (10 men and 20 women), and group II consisted of 33 patients (11 men and 22 women). Between the 2 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in sex, body mass index, functional scores, AP and lateral displacement of the fracture on postoperative x-ray, operation time, and blood loss. In group II, a faster bony union was obtained than that in group I (4.6 vs. 6.4 months). Complications included 2 cases of transient radial nerve palsy in both groups and metallic failures (2 in group I and 1 in group II).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When performing MIPO for humeral shaft fractures, adding a positional screw could be more stabilizing than bridge plating without a positional screw, leading to faster bony union. A positional screw might help control interfragmentary movement without inhibiting essential interfragmentary movement for fracture healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"16 6","pages":"971-978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positional Screw Effect in the Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using a Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Hun Ji, Ho-Seung Jeong, Ban-Suk Ko, Hwang-Yong You, Hyun-Sik Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios23272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compares the difference in the clinical and radiologic outcomes when minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique is performed with or without using a positional screw in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2010 to January 2021, a retrospective study was conducted on a total of 63 patients who underwent the MIPO technique for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. We divided these patients into 2 groups: in group I, patients underwent MIPO without a positional screw; in group II, patients underwent MIPO with a positional screw. We compared functional outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California at Los Angeles score, Simple Shoulder Test, range of motion before and after surgery, operation time, blood loss, and complications. And we compared radiologic outcomes including pre- and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral displacement of the fracture and union time on plain radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average patient age was 64.6 ± 15.1 years (range, 25-88 years). Group I consisted of 30 patients (10 men and 20 women), and group II consisted of 33 patients (11 men and 22 women). Between the 2 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in sex, body mass index, functional scores, AP and lateral displacement of the fracture on postoperative x-ray, operation time, and blood loss. In group II, a faster bony union was obtained than that in group I (4.6 vs. 6.4 months). Complications included 2 cases of transient radial nerve palsy in both groups and metallic failures (2 in group I and 1 in group II).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When performing MIPO for humeral shaft fractures, adding a positional screw could be more stabilizing than bridge plating without a positional screw, leading to faster bony union. A positional screw might help control interfragmentary movement without inhibiting essential interfragmentary movement for fracture healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"971-978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604565/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23272\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究比较了微创钢板内固定(MIPO)技术治疗肱骨骨干骨折时使用或不使用定位螺钉的临床和影像学结果的差异。方法:2010年1月至2021年1月,对63例采用MIPO技术治疗肱骨干骨折的患者进行回顾性研究。我们将这些患者分为两组:第一组,患者行MIPO,不使用定位螺钉;II组患者行定位螺钉MIPO。我们比较了功能结果,包括美国肩关节外科医生评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校评分、简单肩关节测试、手术前后活动范围、手术时间、出血量和并发症。我们比较了放射学结果,包括术前和术后骨折的正位(AP)和侧位位移以及平片上的愈合时间。结果:患者平均年龄64.6±15.1岁(25 ~ 88岁)。第一组30例(男10例,女20例),第二组33例(男11例,女22例)。两组患者在性别、体重指数、功能评分、术后x线AP、骨折侧移位、手术时间、出血量等方面差异均无统计学意义。II组骨愈合较I组快(4.6个月vs. 6.4个月)。并发症包括两组2例暂时性桡神经麻痹和金属失效(I组2例,II组1例)。结论:在肱骨干骨折行MIPO时,加定位螺钉比不加定位螺钉的桥式钢板更稳定,骨愈合更快。定位螺钉可能有助于控制骨折愈合所需的碎片间运动,而不会抑制碎片间运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positional Screw Effect in the Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using a Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Technique.

Background: This study compares the difference in the clinical and radiologic outcomes when minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique is performed with or without using a positional screw in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

Methods: From January 2010 to January 2021, a retrospective study was conducted on a total of 63 patients who underwent the MIPO technique for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. We divided these patients into 2 groups: in group I, patients underwent MIPO without a positional screw; in group II, patients underwent MIPO with a positional screw. We compared functional outcomes including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California at Los Angeles score, Simple Shoulder Test, range of motion before and after surgery, operation time, blood loss, and complications. And we compared radiologic outcomes including pre- and postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral displacement of the fracture and union time on plain radiographs.

Results: The average patient age was 64.6 ± 15.1 years (range, 25-88 years). Group I consisted of 30 patients (10 men and 20 women), and group II consisted of 33 patients (11 men and 22 women). Between the 2 groups, there was no statistically significant difference in sex, body mass index, functional scores, AP and lateral displacement of the fracture on postoperative x-ray, operation time, and blood loss. In group II, a faster bony union was obtained than that in group I (4.6 vs. 6.4 months). Complications included 2 cases of transient radial nerve palsy in both groups and metallic failures (2 in group I and 1 in group II).

Conclusions: When performing MIPO for humeral shaft fractures, adding a positional screw could be more stabilizing than bridge plating without a positional screw, leading to faster bony union. A positional screw might help control interfragmentary movement without inhibiting essential interfragmentary movement for fracture healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信