全科医生在非工作时间使用视频电话分诊的附加价值:横断面调查研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.2196/52301
Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers
{"title":"全科医生在非工作时间使用视频电话分诊的附加价值:横断面调查研究。","authors":"Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers","doi":"10.2196/52301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many countries have introduced video consultations in primary care both inside and outside of office hours. Despite some relational and technical limitations, general practitioners (GPs) have reported the benefits of video use in the daytime as it provides faster and more flexible access to health care. Studies have indicated that video may be specifically valuable in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC), but additional information on the added value of video use is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate triage GPs' perspectives on video use in GP-led telephone triage in OOH-PC by exploring their reasons for choosing video use and its effect on triage outcome, the decision-making process, communication, and invested time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among GPs performing telephone triage in the OOH-PC service in the Central Denmark Region from September 5, 2022, until December 21, 2022. The questionnaire was integrated into the electronic patient registration system as a pop-up window appearing after every third video contact. This setup automatically linked background data on the contact, patient, and GP to the questionnaire data. We used descriptive analyses to describe reasons for and effects of video use and GP evaluation, stratified by patient age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2456 questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for video use were to assess the severity (n=1951, 79.4%), to increase the probability of self-care (n=1279, 52.1%), and to achieve greater certainty in decision-making (n=810, 33%) (multiple answers were possible for reasons of video use). In 61.9% (n=1516) of contacts, the triage GPs anticipated that the contact would have resulted in a different triage outcome if video had not been used. Use of video resulted in a downgrading of severity level in 88.3% (n=1338) of cases. Triage GPs evaluated the use of video as positive in terms of their decision-making process (n=2358, 96%), communication (n=2214, 90.1%), and invested time (n=2391, 97.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triage GPs assessed that the use of video in telephone triage did affect their triage outcome, mostly by downgrading the level of care needed. The participating triage GPs found video in OOH-PC to be of added value, particularly in communication and the decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Added Value of Using Video in Out-of-Hours Primary Care Telephone Triage Among General Practitioners: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Amalie Nebsbjerg, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Claus Høstrup Vestergaard, Morten Bondo Christensen, Linda Huibers\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/52301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many countries have introduced video consultations in primary care both inside and outside of office hours. Despite some relational and technical limitations, general practitioners (GPs) have reported the benefits of video use in the daytime as it provides faster and more flexible access to health care. Studies have indicated that video may be specifically valuable in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC), but additional information on the added value of video use is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate triage GPs' perspectives on video use in GP-led telephone triage in OOH-PC by exploring their reasons for choosing video use and its effect on triage outcome, the decision-making process, communication, and invested time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among GPs performing telephone triage in the OOH-PC service in the Central Denmark Region from September 5, 2022, until December 21, 2022. The questionnaire was integrated into the electronic patient registration system as a pop-up window appearing after every third video contact. This setup automatically linked background data on the contact, patient, and GP to the questionnaire data. We used descriptive analyses to describe reasons for and effects of video use and GP evaluation, stratified by patient age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2456 questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for video use were to assess the severity (n=1951, 79.4%), to increase the probability of self-care (n=1279, 52.1%), and to achieve greater certainty in decision-making (n=810, 33%) (multiple answers were possible for reasons of video use). In 61.9% (n=1516) of contacts, the triage GPs anticipated that the contact would have resulted in a different triage outcome if video had not been used. Use of video resulted in a downgrading of severity level in 88.3% (n=1338) of cases. Triage GPs evaluated the use of video as positive in terms of their decision-making process (n=2358, 96%), communication (n=2214, 90.1%), and invested time (n=2391, 97.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Triage GPs assessed that the use of video in telephone triage did affect their triage outcome, mostly by downgrading the level of care needed. The participating triage GPs found video in OOH-PC to be of added value, particularly in communication and the decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e52301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/52301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多国家已在办公时间内外在初级保健中引入视频咨询。尽管有一些关系和技术上的限制,全科医生(全科医生)已经报告了白天使用视频的好处,因为它提供了更快、更灵活的医疗服务。研究表明,视频在非工作时间的初级保健(oh - pc)中可能特别有价值,但需要更多关于视频使用附加价值的信息。目的:本研究旨在通过探讨全科医生选择视频的原因及其对分诊结果、决策过程、沟通和投入时间的影响,探讨全科医生在门诊电话分诊中使用视频的观点。方法:从2022年9月5日至2022年12月21日,我们对丹麦中部地区OOH-PC服务中进行电话分诊的全科医生进行了横断面问卷调查。问卷被整合到电子患者登记系统中,每隔三次视频接触后出现一个弹出窗口。该设置自动将联系人、患者和全科医生的背景数据链接到问卷数据。我们使用描述性分析来描述视频使用和全科医生评估的原因和效果,并按患者年龄分层。结果:共完成问卷2456份。使用视频最常见的原因是评估严重程度(n=1951, 79.4%),增加自我护理的可能性(n=1279, 52.1%),以及获得更大的决策确定性(n=810, 33%)(使用视频的原因可能有多个答案)。在61.9% (n=1516)的接触者中,分诊全科医生预计,如果没有使用视频,接触将导致不同的分诊结果。使用视频导致88.3% (n=1338)病例的严重程度降级。分诊全科医生在决策过程(n=2358, 96%)、沟通(n=2214, 90.1%)和投入时间(n=2391, 97.3%)方面评价视频的使用是积极的。结论:分诊全科医生评估,在电话分诊中使用视频确实影响了他们的分诊结果,主要是通过降低所需的护理水平。参与诊检的全科医生认为,OOH-PC的视频具有附加价值,特别是在沟通和决策过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Added Value of Using Video in Out-of-Hours Primary Care Telephone Triage Among General Practitioners: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Background: Many countries have introduced video consultations in primary care both inside and outside of office hours. Despite some relational and technical limitations, general practitioners (GPs) have reported the benefits of video use in the daytime as it provides faster and more flexible access to health care. Studies have indicated that video may be specifically valuable in out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC), but additional information on the added value of video use is needed.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate triage GPs' perspectives on video use in GP-led telephone triage in OOH-PC by exploring their reasons for choosing video use and its effect on triage outcome, the decision-making process, communication, and invested time.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among GPs performing telephone triage in the OOH-PC service in the Central Denmark Region from September 5, 2022, until December 21, 2022. The questionnaire was integrated into the electronic patient registration system as a pop-up window appearing after every third video contact. This setup automatically linked background data on the contact, patient, and GP to the questionnaire data. We used descriptive analyses to describe reasons for and effects of video use and GP evaluation, stratified by patient age.

Results: A total of 2456 questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for video use were to assess the severity (n=1951, 79.4%), to increase the probability of self-care (n=1279, 52.1%), and to achieve greater certainty in decision-making (n=810, 33%) (multiple answers were possible for reasons of video use). In 61.9% (n=1516) of contacts, the triage GPs anticipated that the contact would have resulted in a different triage outcome if video had not been used. Use of video resulted in a downgrading of severity level in 88.3% (n=1338) of cases. Triage GPs evaluated the use of video as positive in terms of their decision-making process (n=2358, 96%), communication (n=2214, 90.1%), and invested time (n=2391, 97.3%).

Conclusions: Triage GPs assessed that the use of video in telephone triage did affect their triage outcome, mostly by downgrading the level of care needed. The participating triage GPs found video in OOH-PC to be of added value, particularly in communication and the decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信