三维模型在复杂程度不等的部分肾切除术中的应用价值。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yajie Li, Qifei Zhou, Weihao Li, Jiahui Cao, Kangjie An, Shuhui Liu, Yanping Ma, Bo Tao, Ning Wang, Yaodong Jia, Lihong Nie, Ruining Zhao
{"title":"三维模型在复杂程度不等的部分肾切除术中的应用价值。","authors":"Yajie Li, Qifei Zhou, Weihao Li, Jiahui Cao, Kangjie An, Shuhui Liu, Yanping Ma, Bo Tao, Ning Wang, Yaodong Jia, Lihong Nie, Ruining Zhao","doi":"10.1159/000542846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the application value of three-dimensional (3D) model in partial nephrectomy across varying RENAL scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 126 patients were enrolled, divided into three groups: 25 cases in the 3D-partial nephrectomy (3D-PN), 86 cases in the 2D-partial nephrectomy (2D-PN), and 15 cases in the 3D-robot-assisted PN (3D-RAPN). Preoperative basic data were collected, including age, gender, neutrophil ratio, platelet count, blood glucose, GFR of the kidney, tumor diameter, tumor staging, RENAL score, Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, surgical time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, change in creatinine level at 3 months postoperatively, and pathological results. Perioperative data between 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, and between the 3D-PN and 3D-RAPN were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding volume compared to the 2D-PN (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in surgical time, warm ischemia time, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the 3D-PN and the 3D-RAPN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RENAL score ≥7 benefit more from preoperative evaluation with 3D model. The combination of 3D model and RARP can further enhance the advantages and expand the convenience of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Application Value of 3D Model in Partial Nephrectomy of Varying Complexity.\",\"authors\":\"Yajie Li, Qifei Zhou, Weihao Li, Jiahui Cao, Kangjie An, Shuhui Liu, Yanping Ma, Bo Tao, Ning Wang, Yaodong Jia, Lihong Nie, Ruining Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore the application value of three-dimensional (3D) model in partial nephrectomy across varying RENAL scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 126 patients were enrolled, divided into three groups: 25 cases in the 3D-partial nephrectomy (3D-PN), 86 cases in the 2D-partial nephrectomy (2D-PN), and 15 cases in the 3D-robot-assisted PN (3D-RAPN). Preoperative basic data were collected, including age, gender, neutrophil ratio, platelet count, blood glucose, GFR of the kidney, tumor diameter, tumor staging, RENAL score, Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, surgical time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, change in creatinine level at 3 months postoperatively, and pathological results. Perioperative data between 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, and between the 3D-PN and 3D-RAPN were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding volume compared to the 2D-PN (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in surgical time, warm ischemia time, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the 3D-PN and the 3D-RAPN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RENAL score ≥7 benefit more from preoperative evaluation with 3D model. The combination of 3D model and RARP can further enhance the advantages and expand the convenience of surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542846\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542846","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:探讨三维(3D)模型在不同肾评分的部分肾切除术中的应用价值。方法:共纳入126例患者,分为3组:3d -部分肾切除术(3D-PN)组25例,2d -部分肾切除术(2D-PN)组86例,3d -机器人辅助肾切除术(3D-RAPN)组15例。收集术前基本资料,包括年龄、性别、中性粒细胞比例、血小板计数、血糖、肾脏GFR、肿瘤直径、肿瘤分期、肾评分、Mayo粘连概率(MAP)评分、手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血、术后引流量、术后住院时间、术后3个月肌酐水平变化、病理结果。比较3D-PN与2D-PN、3D-PN与2D-PN评分4-6亚组之间、3D-PN与2D-PN评分≥7亚组之间、3D-PN与3D-RAPN之间围手术期资料。采用SPSS 26.0版本进行统计学分析。结果:与2D-PN相比,3D- pn在热缺血时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后住院时间等方面均有统计学差异(p)。结论:肾功能评分≥7分的患者术前应用3D模型评估获益更多。3D模型与RARP的结合可以进一步增强优势,扩大手术的便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Application Value of 3D Model in Partial Nephrectomy of Varying Complexity.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to explore the application value of three-dimensional (3D) model in partial nephrectomy across varying RENAL scores.

Methods: A total of 126 patients were enrolled, divided into three groups: 25 cases in the 3D-partial nephrectomy (3D-PN), 86 cases in the 2D-partial nephrectomy (2D-PN), and 15 cases in the 3D-robot-assisted PN (3D-RAPN). Preoperative basic data were collected, including age, gender, neutrophil ratio, platelet count, blood glucose, GFR of the kidney, tumor diameter, tumor staging, RENAL score, Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score, surgical time, warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative hospital stay, change in creatinine level at 3 months postoperatively, and pathological results. Perioperative data between 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, between the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup of 3D-PN and 2D-PN, and between the 3D-PN and 3D-RAPN were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0.

Results: The 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score 4-6 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding volume compared to the 2D-PN (p < 0.05). In the RENAL score ≥7 subgroup, the 3D-PN showed statistically significant differences compared to the 2D-PN in surgical time, warm ischemia time, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the 3D-PN and the 3D-RAPN in warm ischemia time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with RENAL score ≥7 benefit more from preoperative evaluation with 3D model. The combination of 3D model and RARP can further enhance the advantages and expand the convenience of surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信