{"title":"脑卒中患者下肢矫形器使用者满意度与生活质量和功能关系的调查:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Ahmet Veli İçoglu, Sulenur Yildiz","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2435199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthosis satisfaction may be an important parameter that increases orthosis usage and reveals orthosis' positive effect on rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the relationship between lower limb orthosis user satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) and functionality in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four stroke patients with a mean age of 56.91 ± 14.08 years were included. Orthosis user satisfaction was evaluated using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS). QOL was assessed using the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). Lastly, functional status was evaluated using the Fugl - Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships were found between the OPUS total satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (<i>r</i> = -0.412, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and upper extremity (<i>r</i> = -0.401, <i>p</i> = 0.007); OPUS device satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (<i>r</i> = -0.484, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and upper extremity function (<i>r</i> = -0.379, <i>p</i> = 0.011); and OPUS service satisfaction and FMA-LE (<i>r</i> = 0.880, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no relationship between the OPUS total satisfaction, service satisfaction, and daily orthosis use time (<i>p</i> > 0.05). While participants' QOL and lower extremity functionality were generally at low, those with better functional status had lower orthosis satisfaction because it made ambulation at home difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking patient opinions into account in the orthotic design process will help to eliminate the problems related to comfort and orthotic wear that might affect orthotic satisfaction. The production of more comfortable orthoses might positively affect individuals' use of orthoses and satisfaction. This outcome may be a good starting point for prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the relationship between lower limb orthosis user satisfaction and quality of life and functionality in stroke patients: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Veli İçoglu, Sulenur Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2435199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthosis satisfaction may be an important parameter that increases orthosis usage and reveals orthosis' positive effect on rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the relationship between lower limb orthosis user satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) and functionality in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four stroke patients with a mean age of 56.91 ± 14.08 years were included. Orthosis user satisfaction was evaluated using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS). QOL was assessed using the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). Lastly, functional status was evaluated using the Fugl - Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relationships were found between the OPUS total satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (<i>r</i> = -0.412, <i>p</i> = 0.005), and upper extremity (<i>r</i> = -0.401, <i>p</i> = 0.007); OPUS device satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (<i>r</i> = -0.484, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and upper extremity function (<i>r</i> = -0.379, <i>p</i> = 0.011); and OPUS service satisfaction and FMA-LE (<i>r</i> = 0.880, <i>p</i> = 0.001). There was no relationship between the OPUS total satisfaction, service satisfaction, and daily orthosis use time (<i>p</i> > 0.05). While participants' QOL and lower extremity functionality were generally at low, those with better functional status had lower orthosis satisfaction because it made ambulation at home difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Taking patient opinions into account in the orthotic design process will help to eliminate the problems related to comfort and orthotic wear that might affect orthotic satisfaction. The production of more comfortable orthoses might positively affect individuals' use of orthoses and satisfaction. This outcome may be a good starting point for prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2435199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2435199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:矫形器满意度可能是提高矫形器使用率和揭示矫形器对康复的积极作用的重要参数。目的:探讨脑卒中患者下肢矫形器使用者满意度与生活质量及功能的关系。方法:选取44例脑卒中患者,平均年龄56.91±14.08岁。矫形器使用者满意度评估采用矫形与修复术使用者调查(OPUS)。生活质量采用卒中特异性生活质量量表(SS-QOL)评估。最后,使用Fugl - Meyer下肢功能评估(FMA-LE)和定时Up and Go测试(TUGT)评估功能状态。结果:OPUS总满意度与ss - qol自我护理(r = -0.412, p = 0.005)、上肢(r = -0.401, p = 0.007)存在相关性;OPUS器械满意度与ss - qol自我护理(r = -0.484, p r = -0.379, p = 0.011);OPUS服务满意度和FMA-LE (r = 0.880, p = 0.001)。OPUS总满意度、服务满意度与每日矫形器使用时间无相关性(p < 0.05)。虽然参与者的生活质量和下肢功能普遍较低,但功能状态较好的人对矫形器的满意度较低,因为它使在家行走困难。结论:在矫形器设计过程中考虑患者的意见有助于消除影响矫形器满意度的舒适性和矫形器磨损问题。舒适矫形器的生产对个体矫形器的使用和满意度有正向影响。这一结果可能是前瞻性研究的一个很好的起点。
Investigation of the relationship between lower limb orthosis user satisfaction and quality of life and functionality in stroke patients: a cross-sectional study.
Background: Orthosis satisfaction may be an important parameter that increases orthosis usage and reveals orthosis' positive effect on rehabilitation.
Objectives: To investigate the relationship between lower limb orthosis user satisfaction and quality of life (QOL) and functionality in stroke patients.
Methods: Forty-four stroke patients with a mean age of 56.91 ± 14.08 years were included. Orthosis user satisfaction was evaluated using the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS). QOL was assessed using the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL). Lastly, functional status was evaluated using the Fugl - Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT).
Results: The relationships were found between the OPUS total satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (r = -0.412, p = 0.005), and upper extremity (r = -0.401, p = 0.007); OPUS device satisfaction and SS-QOL-selfcare (r = -0.484, p < 0.001) and upper extremity function (r = -0.379, p = 0.011); and OPUS service satisfaction and FMA-LE (r = 0.880, p = 0.001). There was no relationship between the OPUS total satisfaction, service satisfaction, and daily orthosis use time (p > 0.05). While participants' QOL and lower extremity functionality were generally at low, those with better functional status had lower orthosis satisfaction because it made ambulation at home difficult.
Conclusion: Taking patient opinions into account in the orthotic design process will help to eliminate the problems related to comfort and orthotic wear that might affect orthotic satisfaction. The production of more comfortable orthoses might positively affect individuals' use of orthoses and satisfaction. This outcome may be a good starting point for prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.