阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的人工智能面部识别:贝叶斯荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Esther Yanxin Gao, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Shaun Ray Han Loh, Maythad Uataya, Liang Chye Goh, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Song Tar Toh
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的人工智能面部识别:贝叶斯荟萃分析。","authors":"Esther Yanxin Gao, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Shaun Ray Han Loh, Maythad Uataya, Liang Chye Goh, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Song Tar Toh","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03173-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis via polysomnography can be costly and inaccessible. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the use of craniofacial photographs to diagnose OSA. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of this innovative approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, then selected and graded the risk of bias of observational studies of adults (≥ 18 years) comparing the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms using craniofacial photographs, versus conventional OSA diagnostic criteria (i.e. apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]). Studies were excluded if they detected apneic events without diagnosing OSA. AI models evaluated with a random split test set or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 5,147 records, 6 studies were included, containing 10 AI models trained/tested on 1,417/983 participants. The risk of bias was low. AI trained on craniofacial photographs achieved a pooled 84.9% sensitivity (95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%) and 71.2% specificity (95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%). Bayesian meta-regression identified deep learning (convolutional neural networks) as the most accurate AI algorithm (91.1% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity) comparable to home sleep apnea tests. AHI cutoffs, OSA prevalence, feature engineering, input data, camera type and informativeness of Bayesian prior did not alter diagnostic accuracy. There was no substantial publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI trained on craniofacial photographs have high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered as a low-cost OSA screening tool. Future work focused on deep learning using smartphone images could improve the feasibility of this approach in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence facial recognition of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Esther Yanxin Gao, Benjamin Kye Jyn Tan, Nicole Kye Wen Tan, Adele Chin Wei Ng, Zhou Hao Leong, Chu Qin Phua, Shaun Ray Han Loh, Maythad Uataya, Liang Chye Goh, Thun How Ong, Leong Chai Leow, Guang-Bin Huang, Song Tar Toh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-024-03173-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Conventional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis via polysomnography can be costly and inaccessible. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the use of craniofacial photographs to diagnose OSA. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of this innovative approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, then selected and graded the risk of bias of observational studies of adults (≥ 18 years) comparing the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms using craniofacial photographs, versus conventional OSA diagnostic criteria (i.e. apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]). Studies were excluded if they detected apneic events without diagnosing OSA. AI models evaluated with a random split test set or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 5,147 records, 6 studies were included, containing 10 AI models trained/tested on 1,417/983 participants. The risk of bias was low. AI trained on craniofacial photographs achieved a pooled 84.9% sensitivity (95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%) and 71.2% specificity (95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%). Bayesian meta-regression identified deep learning (convolutional neural networks) as the most accurate AI algorithm (91.1% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity) comparable to home sleep apnea tests. AHI cutoffs, OSA prevalence, feature engineering, input data, camera type and informativeness of Bayesian prior did not alter diagnostic accuracy. There was no substantial publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI trained on craniofacial photographs have high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered as a low-cost OSA screening tool. Future work focused on deep learning using smartphone images could improve the feasibility of this approach in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03173-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03173-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过多导睡眠图诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是昂贵且难以获得的。人工智能(AI)的最新进展使颅面照片能够诊断OSA。本荟萃分析旨在阐明这种创新方法的诊断准确性。方法:两名盲法审查者检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和IEEE Xplore数据库,然后选择成人(≥18岁)观察性研究的偏倚风险并评分,比较使用颅面照片的AI算法与传统OSA诊断标准(即呼吸暂停-低通气指数[AHI])的诊断性能。如果检测到呼吸暂停事件而没有诊断出OSA,则排除研究。采用随机分割检验集或k折交叉验证评估的人工智能模型被纳入贝叶斯双变量荟萃分析。结果:从5147条记录中,包括6项研究,包含10个人工智能模型,对1417 /983名参与者进行了训练/测试。偏倚风险较低。在颅面照片上训练的人工智能获得了84.9%的灵敏度(95%可信区间[95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%)和71.2%的特异性(95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%)。贝叶斯元回归发现深度学习(卷积神经网络)是与家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试相比最准确的人工智能算法(灵敏度为91.1%,特异性为79.2%)。AHI截止值、OSA患病率、特征工程、输入数据、摄像机类型和贝叶斯先验的信息量没有改变诊断的准确性。没有明显的发表偏倚。结论:经颅面照片训练的人工智能诊断准确率高,可作为一种低成本的OSA筛查工具。未来的工作重点是使用智能手机图像进行深度学习,可以提高这种方法在初级保健中的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence facial recognition of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.

Purpose: Conventional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis via polysomnography can be costly and inaccessible. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the use of craniofacial photographs to diagnose OSA. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of this innovative approach.

Methods: Two blinded reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, then selected and graded the risk of bias of observational studies of adults (≥ 18 years) comparing the diagnostic performance of AI algorithms using craniofacial photographs, versus conventional OSA diagnostic criteria (i.e. apnea-hypopnea index [AHI]). Studies were excluded if they detected apneic events without diagnosing OSA. AI models evaluated with a random split test set or k-fold cross-validation were included in a Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis.

Results: From 5,147 records, 6 studies were included, containing 10 AI models trained/tested on 1,417/983 participants. The risk of bias was low. AI trained on craniofacial photographs achieved a pooled 84.9% sensitivity (95% credible interval [95% CrI]: 77.1-90.7%) and 71.2% specificity (95% CrI: 60.7-81.4%). Bayesian meta-regression identified deep learning (convolutional neural networks) as the most accurate AI algorithm (91.1% sensitivity, 79.2% specificity) comparable to home sleep apnea tests. AHI cutoffs, OSA prevalence, feature engineering, input data, camera type and informativeness of Bayesian prior did not alter diagnostic accuracy. There was no substantial publication bias.

Conclusion: AI trained on craniofacial photographs have high diagnostic accuracy and should be considered as a low-cost OSA screening tool. Future work focused on deep learning using smartphone images could improve the feasibility of this approach in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信