[疼痛医学专业发展与工作满意度]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Schmerz Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9
Joachim Erlenwein, Benedikt Kube, Dirk Boujong, Joachim Nadstawek, Michael Hüppe, Tim P Jürgens, Winfried Meißner, Frank Petzke
{"title":"[疼痛医学专业发展与工作满意度]。","authors":"Joachim Erlenwein, Benedikt Kube, Dirk Boujong, Joachim Nadstawek, Michael Hüppe, Tim P Jürgens, Winfried Meißner, Frank Petzke","doi":"10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain medicine is an interdisciplinary and interprofessional field of specialisation. Due to concerns about new recruits and an aging workforce, especially among physicians, it is important to better understand professional and career pathways in pain medicine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to record the occupational routes of people working in an institution specialised in pain medicine/pain management as well as their motivation and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A standardised online questionnaire was used to survey members via cooperating scientific societies and organisations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 398 physicians, 78 psychologists, 62 physiotherapists, three occupational therapists and 23 nursing professionals were included in the analysis. The age distribution skewed towards higher age groups, with the majority of respondents aged between 51 and 60 years. The respondents usually first came into clinical contact with pain medicine after many years of work. In the case of physicians in particular, there was a delay of almost a decade after their licence to practise. With regard to motivational factors, intrinsic aspects were rated higher than monetary ones. Work-life balance issues tended to be in the middle of the ranking. Regarding job satisfaction in pain medicine, the overall satisfaction of the respondents was high, with the lowest satisfaction ratings being given in the categories \"opportunities for further career development\", \"additional income options\" and \"recognition by superiors\". A significant proportion of respondents (1/3) stated that career changes were forthcoming-changes outside a pain medicine setting or in particular retirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results emphasise the critical perspectives regarding the future provision of care for people with chronic pain. The results provide, for the first time, an insight into the career routes of staff in the field of pain medicine and their motivations and job satisfaction, which should be considered in the discussion about ensuring personnel resources in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":21572,"journal":{"name":"Schmerz","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Professional development and job satisfaction in pain medicine].\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Erlenwein, Benedikt Kube, Dirk Boujong, Joachim Nadstawek, Michael Hüppe, Tim P Jürgens, Winfried Meißner, Frank Petzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain medicine is an interdisciplinary and interprofessional field of specialisation. Due to concerns about new recruits and an aging workforce, especially among physicians, it is important to better understand professional and career pathways in pain medicine.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to record the occupational routes of people working in an institution specialised in pain medicine/pain management as well as their motivation and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A standardised online questionnaire was used to survey members via cooperating scientific societies and organisations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 398 physicians, 78 psychologists, 62 physiotherapists, three occupational therapists and 23 nursing professionals were included in the analysis. The age distribution skewed towards higher age groups, with the majority of respondents aged between 51 and 60 years. The respondents usually first came into clinical contact with pain medicine after many years of work. In the case of physicians in particular, there was a delay of almost a decade after their licence to practise. With regard to motivational factors, intrinsic aspects were rated higher than monetary ones. Work-life balance issues tended to be in the middle of the ranking. Regarding job satisfaction in pain medicine, the overall satisfaction of the respondents was high, with the lowest satisfaction ratings being given in the categories \\\"opportunities for further career development\\\", \\\"additional income options\\\" and \\\"recognition by superiors\\\". A significant proportion of respondents (1/3) stated that career changes were forthcoming-changes outside a pain medicine setting or in particular retirement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results emphasise the critical perspectives regarding the future provision of care for people with chronic pain. The results provide, for the first time, an insight into the career routes of staff in the field of pain medicine and their motivations and job satisfaction, which should be considered in the discussion about ensuring personnel resources in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schmerz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schmerz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmerz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00851-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛医学是一个跨学科、跨专业的专业领域。由于对新招募人员和劳动力老龄化的担忧,特别是在医生中,更好地了解疼痛医学的专业和职业道路是很重要的。目的:本研究的目的是记录在疼痛医学/疼痛管理专业机构工作的人员的职业路线,以及他们的动机和工作满意度。材料和方法:采用标准化的在线问卷,通过合作的科学协会和组织对会员进行调查。结果:398名内科医生、78名心理学家、62名物理治疗师、3名职业治疗师和23名护理专业人员的数据被纳入分析。年龄分布倾向于较高的年龄组,大多数受访者年龄在51岁至60岁之间。受访者通常是在工作多年后才开始临床接触止痛药。特别是在医生的情况下,有近十年的延迟后,他们的执业执照。在激励因素方面,内在因素的评分高于金钱因素。工作与生活的平衡问题往往处于排名的中间位置。在疼痛医学工作满意度方面,受访者的整体满意度较高,其中满意度最低的是“职业发展机会”、“额外收入选择”和“上级认可”。相当大比例的受访者(1/3)表示,职业变化即将到来——在疼痛医学领域之外的变化,特别是退休。结论:研究结果强调了对慢性疼痛患者未来护理提供的关键观点。研究结果首次揭示了疼痛医学领域工作人员的职业发展路径、工作动机和工作满意度,为今后的人力资源保障提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Professional development and job satisfaction in pain medicine].

Background: Pain medicine is an interdisciplinary and interprofessional field of specialisation. Due to concerns about new recruits and an aging workforce, especially among physicians, it is important to better understand professional and career pathways in pain medicine.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to record the occupational routes of people working in an institution specialised in pain medicine/pain management as well as their motivation and job satisfaction.

Materials and methods: A standardised online questionnaire was used to survey members via cooperating scientific societies and organisations.

Results: Data from 398 physicians, 78 psychologists, 62 physiotherapists, three occupational therapists and 23 nursing professionals were included in the analysis. The age distribution skewed towards higher age groups, with the majority of respondents aged between 51 and 60 years. The respondents usually first came into clinical contact with pain medicine after many years of work. In the case of physicians in particular, there was a delay of almost a decade after their licence to practise. With regard to motivational factors, intrinsic aspects were rated higher than monetary ones. Work-life balance issues tended to be in the middle of the ranking. Regarding job satisfaction in pain medicine, the overall satisfaction of the respondents was high, with the lowest satisfaction ratings being given in the categories "opportunities for further career development", "additional income options" and "recognition by superiors". A significant proportion of respondents (1/3) stated that career changes were forthcoming-changes outside a pain medicine setting or in particular retirement.

Conclusions: The results emphasise the critical perspectives regarding the future provision of care for people with chronic pain. The results provide, for the first time, an insight into the career routes of staff in the field of pain medicine and their motivations and job satisfaction, which should be considered in the discussion about ensuring personnel resources in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schmerz
Schmerz 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Schmerz is an internationally recognized journal and addresses all scientists, practitioners and psychologists, dealing with the treatment of pain patients or working in pain research. The aim of the journal is to enhance the treatment of pain patients in the long run. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of pain research, pain management and pain symptom management. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信