眼睑边缘良性肿瘤激光消融后的二次愈合。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Gang Seok Jeon, In Hwan Hong, Tae Yeem Lee, Tae Geun Song, Jae Ryong Han
{"title":"眼睑边缘良性肿瘤激光消融后的二次愈合。","authors":"Gang Seok Jeon, In Hwan Hong, Tae Yeem Lee, Tae Geun Song, Jae Ryong Han","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2435942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to present the therapeutic outcomes of benign eyelid margin tumors treated with laser ablation, offering an alternative approach to traditional shaving biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all patients, tumors were eliminated through either laser ablation or shaving biopsy. Comparative analysis was conducted between two patient groups: the laser-assisted ablation group (Group 1) and the shaving excision surgery group (Group 2). A total of 66 patients with 67 benign eyelid margin tumors were retrospectively included in this study (2019-2023). Thity-four cases underwent laser ablation, and 33 cases were subjected to shaving excision biopsy. Postoperatively, histologic confirmation was obtained in 11 out of the 33 cases that underwent shaving excision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, no functional or cosmetic complications were observed. The wound margin was clear after laser-assisted ablation in all cases. In Group 2, there was one instance of eyelid notching, loss of cilia, and two pigmentations. No wound infections were reported. The average wound epithelialization duration was 3.3 weeks in Group 1, significantly faster than 4.2 weeks in Group 2 (<i>p</i> < .01). The average lesion size was 3.0 × 2.9 mm in Group 1, significantly smaller than 3.5 × 3.4 mm in Group 2 (<i>p</i> < .05). No recurrences were observed during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser ablation for small benign eyelid margin tumors may be a favorable alternative to shaving excision biopsy surgery. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. There was no definitive postoperative or intraoperative complication during or after laser application.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second Intention Healing After Laser Ablation of Benign Eyelid Margin Tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Gang Seok Jeon, In Hwan Hong, Tae Yeem Lee, Tae Geun Song, Jae Ryong Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08820538.2024.2435942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to present the therapeutic outcomes of benign eyelid margin tumors treated with laser ablation, offering an alternative approach to traditional shaving biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all patients, tumors were eliminated through either laser ablation or shaving biopsy. Comparative analysis was conducted between two patient groups: the laser-assisted ablation group (Group 1) and the shaving excision surgery group (Group 2). A total of 66 patients with 67 benign eyelid margin tumors were retrospectively included in this study (2019-2023). Thity-four cases underwent laser ablation, and 33 cases were subjected to shaving excision biopsy. Postoperatively, histologic confirmation was obtained in 11 out of the 33 cases that underwent shaving excision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, no functional or cosmetic complications were observed. The wound margin was clear after laser-assisted ablation in all cases. In Group 2, there was one instance of eyelid notching, loss of cilia, and two pigmentations. No wound infections were reported. The average wound epithelialization duration was 3.3 weeks in Group 1, significantly faster than 4.2 weeks in Group 2 (<i>p</i> < .01). The average lesion size was 3.0 × 2.9 mm in Group 1, significantly smaller than 3.5 × 3.4 mm in Group 2 (<i>p</i> < .05). No recurrences were observed during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser ablation for small benign eyelid margin tumors may be a favorable alternative to shaving excision biopsy surgery. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. There was no definitive postoperative or intraoperative complication during or after laser application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2435942\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2435942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在介绍激光消融治疗良性眼睑缘肿瘤的疗效,为传统的剃须活检提供一种替代方法。方法:所有患者均通过激光消融或刮除活检切除肿瘤。对比分析两组患者:激光辅助消融组(1组)和剃除手术组(2组)。本研究回顾性纳入66例67例眼睑边缘良性肿瘤患者(2019-2023年)。34例行激光消融,33例行剃须切除活检。术后,33例患者中有11例获得了组织学证实。结果:第一组患者无功能、美观并发症。所有病例经激光消融后伤口边缘清晰。在第二组中,有一例眼睑缺口,纤毛缺失和两种色素沉着。无伤口感染报告。1组创面上皮化的平均持续时间为3.3周,明显快于2组的4.2周(p p)。结论:激光消融治疗良性眼睑边缘小肿瘤可能是剃须切除活检手术的一种较好的选择。所有患者对美容效果都很满意。在激光应用期间或之后,没有明确的术后或术中并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Second Intention Healing After Laser Ablation of Benign Eyelid Margin Tumors.

Purpose: This study aims to present the therapeutic outcomes of benign eyelid margin tumors treated with laser ablation, offering an alternative approach to traditional shaving biopsy.

Methods: In all patients, tumors were eliminated through either laser ablation or shaving biopsy. Comparative analysis was conducted between two patient groups: the laser-assisted ablation group (Group 1) and the shaving excision surgery group (Group 2). A total of 66 patients with 67 benign eyelid margin tumors were retrospectively included in this study (2019-2023). Thity-four cases underwent laser ablation, and 33 cases were subjected to shaving excision biopsy. Postoperatively, histologic confirmation was obtained in 11 out of the 33 cases that underwent shaving excision.

Results: In Group 1, no functional or cosmetic complications were observed. The wound margin was clear after laser-assisted ablation in all cases. In Group 2, there was one instance of eyelid notching, loss of cilia, and two pigmentations. No wound infections were reported. The average wound epithelialization duration was 3.3 weeks in Group 1, significantly faster than 4.2 weeks in Group 2 (p < .01). The average lesion size was 3.0 × 2.9 mm in Group 1, significantly smaller than 3.5 × 3.4 mm in Group 2 (p < .05). No recurrences were observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusions: Laser ablation for small benign eyelid margin tumors may be a favorable alternative to shaving excision biopsy surgery. All patients were satisfied with the cosmetic result. There was no definitive postoperative or intraoperative complication during or after laser application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Ophthalmology
Seminars in Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信