英国小学反欺凌项目(KiVa)的效果和成本:一项多中心集群随机对照试验。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lucy Bowes, Malavika Babu, Julia R Badger, Matthew R Broome, Rebecca Cannings-John, Suzy Clarkson, Elinor Coulman, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Tamsin Ford, Richard P Hastings, Rachel Hayes, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Eleri Owen-Jones, Paul Patterson, Jeremy Segrott, Mia Sydenham, Julia Townson, Richard C Watkins, Holly Whiteley, Margiad E Williams, Judy Hutchings
{"title":"英国小学反欺凌项目(KiVa)的效果和成本:一项多中心集群随机对照试验。","authors":"Lucy Bowes, Malavika Babu, Julia R Badger, Matthew R Broome, Rebecca Cannings-John, Suzy Clarkson, Elinor Coulman, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Tamsin Ford, Richard P Hastings, Rachel Hayes, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Eleri Owen-Jones, Paul Patterson, Jeremy Segrott, Mia Sydenham, Julia Townson, Richard C Watkins, Holly Whiteley, Margiad E Williams, Judy Hutchings","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724002666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 8/11/2019-12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: <i>n</i> = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: <i>n</i> = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, <i>p</i> value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Bowes, Malavika Babu, Julia R Badger, Matthew R Broome, Rebecca Cannings-John, Suzy Clarkson, Elinor Coulman, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Tamsin Ford, Richard P Hastings, Rachel Hayes, Fiona Lugg-Widger, Eleri Owen-Jones, Paul Patterson, Jeremy Segrott, Mia Sydenham, Julia Townson, Richard C Watkins, Holly Whiteley, Margiad E Williams, Judy Hutchings\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0033291724002666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between 8/11/2019-12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: <i>n</i> = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: <i>n</i> = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, <i>p</i> value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650158/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002666\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童欺凌是一个公共卫生重点问题。我们评估了KiVa的有效性和成本,KiVa是一个全校反欺凌项目,以同龄人为目标。方法:采用嵌入经济评价的两组多中心随机对照试验。学校被随机分为kiva干预或常规做法(UP),根据学校规模和免费校餐资格分层。KiVa是由训练有素的教师在一个学年中讲授的。随机分组后12个月随访。主要结果:学生报告的欺凌受害;次要结局:自我报告的欺凌行为、参与者在欺凌中的角色、共情和教师报告的优势和困难问卷。结果分析采用多水平线性和逻辑回归模型。研究结果:2019年8月11日- 2021年2月12日,在4个试验点共招募118所小学,11111名小学生参与小学分析(kiva干预:n = 5944;49.6%的女性;UP: n = 5167, 49.0%女性)。在基线时,在UP组中有21.6%的学生报告受到欺凌,在kiva干预组中有20.3%,在随访时UP组和kiva干预组分别降至20.7%和17.7%(优势比0.87;95%置信区间0.78 ~ 0.97,p值= 0.009)。KiVa组的学生明显有更高的同理心和更少的同伴问题。我们发现在欺凌行为、学校福利、情绪或行为问题上没有差异。先验亚组分析显示,社会经济梯度或性别对有效性没有差异。KiVa第一年每位学生的费用比常规做法高出20.78英镑,随后几年每位学生的费用高出1.65英镑。解释:KiVa反欺凌项目在减少欺凌受害者方面是有效的,对公共卫生的重要性具有中小型影响。资助:本研究由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)公共卫生研究项目资助(17-92-11)。干预费用由Rayne基金会、GwE北威尔士地区学校改善服务、儿童服务、德文郡议会和汇丰全球服务(英国)有限公司资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects and costs of an anti-bullying program (KiVa) in UK primary schools: a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial.

Background: Childhood bullying is a public health priority. We evaluated the effectiveness and costs of KiVa, a whole-school anti-bullying program that targets the peer context.

Methods: A two-arm pragmatic multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with embedded economic evaluation. Schools were randomized to KiVa-intervention or usual practice (UP), stratified on school size and Free School Meals eligibility. KiVa was delivered by trained teachers across one school year. Follow-up was at 12 months post randomization. Primary outcome: student-reported bullying-victimization; secondary outcomes: self-reported bullying-perpetration, participant roles in bullying, empathy and teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Outcomes were analyzed using multilevel linear and logistic regression models.

Findings: Between 8/11/2019-12/02/2021, 118 primary schools were recruited in four trial sites, 11 111 students in primary analysis (KiVa-intervention: n = 5944; 49.6% female; UP: n = 5167, 49.0% female). At baseline, 21.6% of students reported being bullied in the UP group and 20.3% in the KiVa-intervention group, reducing to 20.7% in the UP group and 17.7% in the KiVa-intervention group at follow-up (odds ratio 0.87; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.97, p value = 0.009). Students in the KiVa group had significantly higher empathy and reduced peer problems. We found no differences in bullying perpetration, school wellbeing, emotional or behavioral problems. A priori subgroup analyses revealed no differences in effectiveness by socioeconomic gradient, or by gender. KiVa costs £20.78 more per pupil than usual practice in the first year, and £1.65 more per pupil in subsequent years.

Interpretation: The KiVa anti-bullying program is effective at reducing bullying victimization with small-moderate effects of public health importance.

Funding: The study was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research program (17-92-11). Intervention costs were funded by the Rayne Foundation, GwE North Wales Regional School Improvement Service, Children's Services, Devon County Council and HSBC Global Services (UK) Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信