可理解连续体:一种分析患者报告结果测量的可理解性的新方法。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victoria Gale, Philip A Powell, Jill Carlton
{"title":"可理解连续体:一种分析患者报告结果测量的可理解性的新方法。","authors":"Victoria Gale, Philip A Powell, Jill Carlton","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03858-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence of comprehensibility is frequently required during the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); the respondent's interpretation of PROM items needs to align with intended meanings. Cognitive interviews are recommended for investigating PROM comprehensibility, yet guidance for analysis is lacking. Consequently, the quality and trustworthiness of cognitive interview data and analysis is threatened, as there is no clear procedure detailing how analysts can systematically, and consistently, identify evidence that respondent interpretations align/misalign with intended meanings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper presents a novel, structured approach to comprehensibility analysis - the 'Comprehensibility Continuum' - that builds upon existing cognitive interview guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Comprehensibility Continuum comprises a structured rating scale to code depth of alignment between intended item meaning and respondent interpretation and consists of five main stages: before cognitive interviews are conducted, researchers must (1) Define intended meanings of PROM items; and (2) Determine comprehensibility thresholds for both participant- and item-level. After conducting interviews, they (3) Prepare data by transcribing interviews 'intelligent' verbatim; (4) Code transcripts using the Comprehensibility Continuum scale in iterative sets, assigning an overall code for each item at participant-level; and (5) Compare participant-level codes across all participants to determine overall item comprehensibility, such that decisions can be made to retain, modify, or remove items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality in qualitative data analysis is achieved through rigorous methods that are clearly described and justified. Given insufficiency in guidelines, cognitive interviewers must reflect on how best to demonstrate PROM comprehensibility systematically and consistently from interview data, and the Comprehensibility Continuum method offers a potential solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The comprehensibility continuum: a novel method for analysing comprehensibility of patient reported outcome measures.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Gale, Philip A Powell, Jill Carlton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11136-024-03858-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evidence of comprehensibility is frequently required during the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); the respondent's interpretation of PROM items needs to align with intended meanings. Cognitive interviews are recommended for investigating PROM comprehensibility, yet guidance for analysis is lacking. Consequently, the quality and trustworthiness of cognitive interview data and analysis is threatened, as there is no clear procedure detailing how analysts can systematically, and consistently, identify evidence that respondent interpretations align/misalign with intended meanings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper presents a novel, structured approach to comprehensibility analysis - the 'Comprehensibility Continuum' - that builds upon existing cognitive interview guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Comprehensibility Continuum comprises a structured rating scale to code depth of alignment between intended item meaning and respondent interpretation and consists of five main stages: before cognitive interviews are conducted, researchers must (1) Define intended meanings of PROM items; and (2) Determine comprehensibility thresholds for both participant- and item-level. After conducting interviews, they (3) Prepare data by transcribing interviews 'intelligent' verbatim; (4) Code transcripts using the Comprehensibility Continuum scale in iterative sets, assigning an overall code for each item at participant-level; and (5) Compare participant-level codes across all participants to determine overall item comprehensibility, such that decisions can be made to retain, modify, or remove items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality in qualitative data analysis is achieved through rigorous methods that are clearly described and justified. Given insufficiency in guidelines, cognitive interviewers must reflect on how best to demonstrate PROM comprehensibility systematically and consistently from interview data, and the Comprehensibility Continuum method offers a potential solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality of Life Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03858-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03858-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在制定患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的过程中,经常需要可理解性的证据;被访者对PROM项目的解释需要与预期的含义保持一致。认知访谈被推荐用于调查PROM的可理解性,但缺乏分析指导。因此,认知访谈数据和分析的质量和可信度受到了威胁,因为没有明确的程序详细说明分析师如何系统地、一致地识别被调查者的解释与预期含义一致/不一致的证据。方法:本文提出了一种新颖的、结构化的可理解性分析方法——“可理解连续体”——它建立在现有的认知访谈指导的基础上。结果:可理解性连续体包括一个结构化的评分量表,用于编码项目意图含义与被调查者解释之间的一致性深度,包括五个主要阶段:在进行认知访谈之前,研究者必须(1)定义PROM项目的意图含义;(2)确定参与者和项目层面的可理解性阈值。在进行采访后,他们(3)通过“智能”逐字抄录采访来准备数据;(4)在迭代集中使用可理解连续尺度的代码转录,在参与者层面为每个项目分配一个总体代码;(5)比较所有参与者的参与者级别代码,以确定整体项目的可理解性,从而可以做出保留、修改或删除项目的决定。结论:定性数据分析的质量是通过明确描述和证明的严格方法实现的。鉴于指导方针的不足,认知采访者必须反思如何最好地系统和一致地从访谈数据中展示PROM的可理解性,而可理解性连续体方法提供了一个潜在的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The comprehensibility continuum: a novel method for analysing comprehensibility of patient reported outcome measures.

Purpose: Evidence of comprehensibility is frequently required during the development of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); the respondent's interpretation of PROM items needs to align with intended meanings. Cognitive interviews are recommended for investigating PROM comprehensibility, yet guidance for analysis is lacking. Consequently, the quality and trustworthiness of cognitive interview data and analysis is threatened, as there is no clear procedure detailing how analysts can systematically, and consistently, identify evidence that respondent interpretations align/misalign with intended meanings.

Methods: This paper presents a novel, structured approach to comprehensibility analysis - the 'Comprehensibility Continuum' - that builds upon existing cognitive interview guidance.

Results: The Comprehensibility Continuum comprises a structured rating scale to code depth of alignment between intended item meaning and respondent interpretation and consists of five main stages: before cognitive interviews are conducted, researchers must (1) Define intended meanings of PROM items; and (2) Determine comprehensibility thresholds for both participant- and item-level. After conducting interviews, they (3) Prepare data by transcribing interviews 'intelligent' verbatim; (4) Code transcripts using the Comprehensibility Continuum scale in iterative sets, assigning an overall code for each item at participant-level; and (5) Compare participant-level codes across all participants to determine overall item comprehensibility, such that decisions can be made to retain, modify, or remove items.

Conclusion: Quality in qualitative data analysis is achieved through rigorous methods that are clearly described and justified. Given insufficiency in guidelines, cognitive interviewers must reflect on how best to demonstrate PROM comprehensibility systematically and consistently from interview data, and the Comprehensibility Continuum method offers a potential solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信