与对照组相比,前交叉韧带重建术后12个月双侧步态生物力学波形分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1002/jor.26001
Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Ashley Buck, Natália Favoreto, Alexander Creighton, Ganesh Kamath, Jeffrey Spang, Jason R Franz, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone
{"title":"与对照组相比,前交叉韧带重建术后12个月双侧步态生物力学波形分析。","authors":"Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Ashley Buck, Natália Favoreto, Alexander Creighton, Ganesh Kamath, Jeffrey Spang, Jason R Franz, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone","doi":"10.1002/jor.26001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics between limbs and to matched uninjured controls (i.e., sex, age, and body mass index) preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months following primary unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Functional mixed effects models were used to identify differences in gait biomechanics throughout the stance phase between the a) ACLR limb and uninvolved limb, b) ACLR limb and controls, and c) uninvolved limb and controls. Compared with the uninvolved limb, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser knee extension moment (KEM; within 8-37% range of stance) during early stance as well as lesser knee flexion moment (KFM; 45-84%) and greater knee flexion angle (KFA; 43-90%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser vertical ground reaction force (vGRF; 5-26%), lesser KEM (7-47%), and lesser knee adduction moment (KAM; 12-35%) during early stance as well as greater vGRF (39-63%) and greater KFA (34-95%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the uninvolved limb demonstrated lesser KFA (1-56%) and lesser KEM (12-54%) during early to mid-stance at all timepoints. While gait becomes more symmetrical over the first 12 months post-ACLR, the ACLR and uninvolved limbs both demonstrate persistent aberrant gait biomechanics compared to controls. Biomechanical waveforms throughout stance can be generally described as less dynamic following ACL injury and ACLR compared with uninjured controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":"322-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bilateral waveform analysis of gait biomechanics presurgery to 12 months following ACL reconstruction compared to controls.\",\"authors\":\"Christin Büttner, Caroline Lisee, Elizabeth Bjornsen, Ashley Buck, Natália Favoreto, Alexander Creighton, Ganesh Kamath, Jeffrey Spang, Jason R Franz, Troy Blackburn, Brian Pietrosimone\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.26001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics between limbs and to matched uninjured controls (i.e., sex, age, and body mass index) preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months following primary unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Functional mixed effects models were used to identify differences in gait biomechanics throughout the stance phase between the a) ACLR limb and uninvolved limb, b) ACLR limb and controls, and c) uninvolved limb and controls. Compared with the uninvolved limb, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser knee extension moment (KEM; within 8-37% range of stance) during early stance as well as lesser knee flexion moment (KFM; 45-84%) and greater knee flexion angle (KFA; 43-90%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser vertical ground reaction force (vGRF; 5-26%), lesser KEM (7-47%), and lesser knee adduction moment (KAM; 12-35%) during early stance as well as greater vGRF (39-63%) and greater KFA (34-95%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the uninvolved limb demonstrated lesser KFA (1-56%) and lesser KEM (12-54%) during early to mid-stance at all timepoints. While gait becomes more symmetrical over the first 12 months post-ACLR, the ACLR and uninvolved limbs both demonstrate persistent aberrant gait biomechanics compared to controls. Biomechanical waveforms throughout stance can be generally described as less dynamic following ACL injury and ACLR compared with uninjured controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"322-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较术前和原发性单侧前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后2、4、6和12个月肢体和匹配的未受伤对照(即性别、年龄和体重指数)的步态生物力学。使用功能混合效应模型来识别a) ACLR肢体与未受累肢体、b) ACLR肢体与对照组、c)未受累肢体与对照组在整个站立阶段的步态生物力学差异。与未受累肢体相比,ACLR肢体表现出较小的膝关节伸展力矩(KEM;在站立的8-37%范围内)以及较小的膝关节屈曲时刻(KFM;45-84%)和更大的膝关节屈曲角度(KFA;43-90%)在所有时间点的中后期站位。与对照组相比,ACLR肢体表现出较小的垂直地面反作用力(vGRF);5-26%),较小的KEM(7-47%)和较小的膝关节内收力矩(KAM;12-35%),以及在中后期站姿期间更高的vGRF(39-63%)和KFA(34-95%)。与对照组相比,未受累肢体在站立早期至中期表现出较小的KFA(1-56%)和较小的KEM(12-54%)。虽然在ACLR后的前12个月步态变得更加对称,但与对照组相比,ACLR和未受损伤的肢体都表现出持续的异常步态生物力学。与未受伤的对照组相比,整个姿态的生物力学波形通常被描述为ACL损伤和ACLR后不那么动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bilateral waveform analysis of gait biomechanics presurgery to 12 months following ACL reconstruction compared to controls.

The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics between limbs and to matched uninjured controls (i.e., sex, age, and body mass index) preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months following primary unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Functional mixed effects models were used to identify differences in gait biomechanics throughout the stance phase between the a) ACLR limb and uninvolved limb, b) ACLR limb and controls, and c) uninvolved limb and controls. Compared with the uninvolved limb, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser knee extension moment (KEM; within 8-37% range of stance) during early stance as well as lesser knee flexion moment (KFM; 45-84%) and greater knee flexion angle (KFA; 43-90%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser vertical ground reaction force (vGRF; 5-26%), lesser KEM (7-47%), and lesser knee adduction moment (KAM; 12-35%) during early stance as well as greater vGRF (39-63%) and greater KFA (34-95%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the uninvolved limb demonstrated lesser KFA (1-56%) and lesser KEM (12-54%) during early to mid-stance at all timepoints. While gait becomes more symmetrical over the first 12 months post-ACLR, the ACLR and uninvolved limbs both demonstrate persistent aberrant gait biomechanics compared to controls. Biomechanical waveforms throughout stance can be generally described as less dynamic following ACL injury and ACLR compared with uninjured controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信