Tianxiao Feng, Xu Wang, Hanmei Bu, Kai Sun, Xiaokuan Qin, Rong Xie, Liguo Zhu, Xu Wei
{"title":"颈椎旋转-牵引手法治疗颈椎神经根病:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tianxiao Feng, Xu Wang, Hanmei Bu, Kai Sun, Xiaokuan Qin, Rong Xie, Liguo Zhu, Xu Wei","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S481803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is one of the representative technique in traditional Chinese orthopedics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CRTM in treating CR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted through eight databases to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Cervical Range of Motion, cervical curvature, and adverse reactions and events. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results indicated that CRTM significantly reduced VAS scores compared to control groups with low-quality evidence [<i>n</i>=534, WMD=-1.27, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.87), <i>p</i><0.00001, <i>I²</i>=59%]. Subgroup analysis showed that differences in control group categories, sample sizes, and intervention durations may contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Besides, CRTM significantly improved cervical range of motion of lateral flexion and rotation with very low-quality evidence. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in NDI scores, JOA scores, or cervical curvature between CRTM and control groups. No adverse reactions and events related to CRTM were reported in included studies, demonstrating its high safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical rotation-traction manipulation appears to be an effective and safe option for managing cervical radiculopathy, significantly improving pain and cervical mobility. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and methodological studies should be conducted to reinforce the evidence base for its clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"4055-4070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611706/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Tianxiao Feng, Xu Wang, Hanmei Bu, Kai Sun, Xiaokuan Qin, Rong Xie, Liguo Zhu, Xu Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S481803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is one of the representative technique in traditional Chinese orthopedics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CRTM in treating CR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted through eight databases to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Cervical Range of Motion, cervical curvature, and adverse reactions and events. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results indicated that CRTM significantly reduced VAS scores compared to control groups with low-quality evidence [<i>n</i>=534, WMD=-1.27, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.87), <i>p</i><0.00001, <i>I²</i>=59%]. Subgroup analysis showed that differences in control group categories, sample sizes, and intervention durations may contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Besides, CRTM significantly improved cervical range of motion of lateral flexion and rotation with very low-quality evidence. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in NDI scores, JOA scores, or cervical curvature between CRTM and control groups. No adverse reactions and events related to CRTM were reported in included studies, demonstrating its high safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical rotation-traction manipulation appears to be an effective and safe option for managing cervical radiculopathy, significantly improving pain and cervical mobility. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and methodological studies should be conducted to reinforce the evidence base for its clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"4055-4070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611706/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S481803\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S481803","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颈椎神经根病(CR)是世界范围内常见的肌肉骨骼疾病。颈椎旋转牵引手法(CRTM)是中医骨科的代表性手法之一。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评价CRTM治疗cr的有效性和安全性。方法:通过8个数据库进行全面的文献检索,找出从成立到2023年12月的相关随机对照试验(rct)。主要观察指标为视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要结局包括颈部残疾指数(NDI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)、颈椎活动度、颈椎曲度、不良反应和事件。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 15.0软件进行meta分析,采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)系统评价证据质量。结果:共纳入9项rct,共904例患者。结果显示,与低质量证据对照组相比,CRTM显著降低了VAS评分[n=534, WMD=-1.27, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.87), pI²=59%]。亚组分析显示,对照组类别、样本量和干预时间的差异可能导致观察到的异质性。此外,CRTM显著改善了颈椎侧屈和旋转的活动范围,但证据质量很低。然而,CRTM组与对照组在NDI评分、JOA评分或颈椎曲度方面无统计学差异。纳入的研究中未报告与CRTM相关的不良反应和事件,表明其安全性高。结论:颈椎旋转牵引手法是治疗颈椎神经根病的一种有效且安全的选择,可显著改善疼痛和颈椎活动能力。然而,需要进一步开展高质量的随机对照试验和方法学研究,以加强其临床实践的证据基础。
Cervical Rotation-Traction Manipulation for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
Background: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a common musculoskeletal disorder worldwide. Cervical rotation-traction manipulation (CRTM) is one of the representative technique in traditional Chinese orthopedics.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CRTM in treating CR.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through eight databases to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to December 2023. The primary outcome was the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Cervical Range of Motion, cervical curvature, and adverse reactions and events. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 software, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of the evidence.
Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 904 patients were included. The results indicated that CRTM significantly reduced VAS scores compared to control groups with low-quality evidence [n=534, WMD=-1.27, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.87), p<0.00001, I²=59%]. Subgroup analysis showed that differences in control group categories, sample sizes, and intervention durations may contribute to the observed heterogeneity. Besides, CRTM significantly improved cervical range of motion of lateral flexion and rotation with very low-quality evidence. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in NDI scores, JOA scores, or cervical curvature between CRTM and control groups. No adverse reactions and events related to CRTM were reported in included studies, demonstrating its high safety.
Conclusion: Cervical rotation-traction manipulation appears to be an effective and safe option for managing cervical radiculopathy, significantly improving pain and cervical mobility. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and methodological studies should be conducted to reinforce the evidence base for its clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.