Thomas Werncke, Lena S Becker, Sabine K Maschke, Inga Brüsch, Regina Rumpel, Frank K Wacker, Bernhard C Meyer
{"title":"原型29:1比例网格对腹部血管造影图像质量和辐射剂量的影响:猪模型的评估。","authors":"Thomas Werncke, Lena S Becker, Sabine K Maschke, Inga Brüsch, Regina Rumpel, Frank K Wacker, Bernhard C Meyer","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a prototype grid with a 29:1 ratio (r29) and a 15:1 (r15) grid on the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in abdominal angiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six typical abdominal angiographic image scenarios were created in 4 pigs. Polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates were used to add 10 cm of patient equivalent thickness to simulate different body types. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with a source-to-image receptor distance of 120 cm. Tantalum- and iron-specific acquisition protocols at different IQ levels were acquired. IQ of radiation dose equivalent image pairs, created with the r29 and r15 grids, respectively, was quantitatively evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Differences in radiation dose were estimated using the dose-weighted CNR. Two blinded readers compared IQ of these images using a Likert scale. In a second step, the readers selected pairs of the r29 and r15 images with subjectively equivalent IQ. Radiation doses were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the r15 grid, the r29 grid images achieved similar CNR at an average of 26% (±12%) lower radiation dose at a mean patient equivalent thickness of 26 cm and 36 cm. Both readers noted a significant increase in IQ (P < 0.001) for dose equivalent images, whereas the interobserver agreement was 0.59. For the selected IQ equivalent images, a radiation dose reduction of 38% (±17%; P < 0.001, interobserver agreement 0.92) was noted when using the r29 grid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an r29 grid at a large source-to-image receptor distance can significantly improve the IQ compared with the r15 grid at the same radiation dose in abdominal angiography or can reduce radiation dose while preserving IQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Prototype 29:1 Ratio Grid on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Abdominal Angiography: Evaluation in a Pig Model.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Werncke, Lena S Becker, Sabine K Maschke, Inga Brüsch, Regina Rumpel, Frank K Wacker, Bernhard C Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a prototype grid with a 29:1 ratio (r29) and a 15:1 (r15) grid on the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in abdominal angiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six typical abdominal angiographic image scenarios were created in 4 pigs. Polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates were used to add 10 cm of patient equivalent thickness to simulate different body types. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with a source-to-image receptor distance of 120 cm. Tantalum- and iron-specific acquisition protocols at different IQ levels were acquired. IQ of radiation dose equivalent image pairs, created with the r29 and r15 grids, respectively, was quantitatively evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Differences in radiation dose were estimated using the dose-weighted CNR. Two blinded readers compared IQ of these images using a Likert scale. In a second step, the readers selected pairs of the r29 and r15 images with subjectively equivalent IQ. Radiation doses were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the r15 grid, the r29 grid images achieved similar CNR at an average of 26% (±12%) lower radiation dose at a mean patient equivalent thickness of 26 cm and 36 cm. Both readers noted a significant increase in IQ (P < 0.001) for dose equivalent images, whereas the interobserver agreement was 0.59. For the selected IQ equivalent images, a radiation dose reduction of 38% (±17%; P < 0.001, interobserver agreement 0.92) was noted when using the r29 grid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an r29 grid at a large source-to-image receptor distance can significantly improve the IQ compared with the r15 grid at the same radiation dose in abdominal angiography or can reduce radiation dose while preserving IQ.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of a Prototype 29:1 Ratio Grid on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Abdominal Angiography: Evaluation in a Pig Model.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a prototype grid with a 29:1 ratio (r29) and a 15:1 (r15) grid on the image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in abdominal angiography.
Materials and methods: Six typical abdominal angiographic image scenarios were created in 4 pigs. Polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum plates were used to add 10 cm of patient equivalent thickness to simulate different body types. Fluoroscopic images were acquired with a source-to-image receptor distance of 120 cm. Tantalum- and iron-specific acquisition protocols at different IQ levels were acquired. IQ of radiation dose equivalent image pairs, created with the r29 and r15 grids, respectively, was quantitatively evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements. Differences in radiation dose were estimated using the dose-weighted CNR. Two blinded readers compared IQ of these images using a Likert scale. In a second step, the readers selected pairs of the r29 and r15 images with subjectively equivalent IQ. Radiation doses were then compared.
Results: Compared with the r15 grid, the r29 grid images achieved similar CNR at an average of 26% (±12%) lower radiation dose at a mean patient equivalent thickness of 26 cm and 36 cm. Both readers noted a significant increase in IQ (P < 0.001) for dose equivalent images, whereas the interobserver agreement was 0.59. For the selected IQ equivalent images, a radiation dose reduction of 38% (±17%; P < 0.001, interobserver agreement 0.92) was noted when using the r29 grid.
Conclusions: The use of an r29 grid at a large source-to-image receptor distance can significantly improve the IQ compared with the r15 grid at the same radiation dose in abdominal angiography or can reduce radiation dose while preserving IQ.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.