成人上颌扩张:CBCT评估骨骼变化,并确定微型螺钉辅助腭扩张力控制多循环缓慢激活和连续快速激活之间的效率因子- MASPE与MARPE。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andre Walter, Heinz Winsauer, Eduardo Crespo, David Walter, Clemens Winsauer, Alexander Schwärzler, Sergi Mojal, Ignacio Arcos, Andreu Puigdollers
{"title":"成人上颌扩张:CBCT评估骨骼变化,并确定微型螺钉辅助腭扩张力控制多循环缓慢激活和连续快速激活之间的效率因子- MASPE与MARPE。","authors":"Andre Walter, Heinz Winsauer, Eduardo Crespo, David Walter, Clemens Winsauer, Alexander Schwärzler, Sergi Mojal, Ignacio Arcos, Andreu Puigdollers","doi":"10.1186/s13005-024-00474-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This consecutive retrospective study compared Mini-implant Assisted Slow Palatal Expansion (MASPE) with rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) using a bone-borne skeletal expander in adults with a narrow maxilla. CBCT scans analyzed transverse changes and potential pterygoid process deformation before (T1) and after expansion (T2).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Force Controlled PolyCyclic (FCPC) SLOW palatal expansion group (FCPC-MASPE-G) comprised 35 adults aged 18-54 years and received a skeletal expander limiting expansive force only allowing 500 cN at the activation wrench (force control). Discontinuous, polycyclic activations according to the FCPC-protocol were applied. The MARPE-group (n = 6) underwent continuous RAPID activation without FCPC until the desired width was reached. CBCT scans were taken pre and post-expansion. Inclusion criteria for both groups were successful outcomes without surgical assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maxilla opened transversally in both groups mildly V-shaped, with a pyramidal shape in the coronal plane, impacting the zygomatic bone. Width measurements at T2 indicated superior mechanical response in FCPC-MASPE-G. Response of zygomaticomaxillary sutures was similar in both groups (p < 0.001 to 0.025). Pterygoid process deformations were notably less in FCPC-MASPE-G (0.87-1.35 mm, p < 0.001) compared to MARPE-G (2.70-3.04 mm, p < 0.001 to 0.009). Dental measurements were similar (p < 0.001 to 0.023), but the ratio \"Mid-palatal suture Opening Related to Expander opening\" (M.O.R.E.-factor) was better with 84% in FCPC-MASPE-G than with 50% in MARPE-G.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slow expansion with FCPC protocol effectively widens the maxilla in adults, with significant impact on bones and sutures and less pterygoid process deformation compared to rapid expansion. Cranial complications were absent in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult maxillary expansion: CBCT evaluation of skeletal changes and determining an efficiency factor between force-controlled polycyclic slow activation and continuous rapid activation for mini-screw-assisted palatal expansion - MASPE vs. MARPE.\",\"authors\":\"Andre Walter, Heinz Winsauer, Eduardo Crespo, David Walter, Clemens Winsauer, Alexander Schwärzler, Sergi Mojal, Ignacio Arcos, Andreu Puigdollers\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13005-024-00474-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This consecutive retrospective study compared Mini-implant Assisted Slow Palatal Expansion (MASPE) with rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) using a bone-borne skeletal expander in adults with a narrow maxilla. CBCT scans analyzed transverse changes and potential pterygoid process deformation before (T1) and after expansion (T2).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Force Controlled PolyCyclic (FCPC) SLOW palatal expansion group (FCPC-MASPE-G) comprised 35 adults aged 18-54 years and received a skeletal expander limiting expansive force only allowing 500 cN at the activation wrench (force control). Discontinuous, polycyclic activations according to the FCPC-protocol were applied. The MARPE-group (n = 6) underwent continuous RAPID activation without FCPC until the desired width was reached. CBCT scans were taken pre and post-expansion. Inclusion criteria for both groups were successful outcomes without surgical assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maxilla opened transversally in both groups mildly V-shaped, with a pyramidal shape in the coronal plane, impacting the zygomatic bone. Width measurements at T2 indicated superior mechanical response in FCPC-MASPE-G. Response of zygomaticomaxillary sutures was similar in both groups (p < 0.001 to 0.025). Pterygoid process deformations were notably less in FCPC-MASPE-G (0.87-1.35 mm, p < 0.001) compared to MARPE-G (2.70-3.04 mm, p < 0.001 to 0.009). Dental measurements were similar (p < 0.001 to 0.023), but the ratio \\\"Mid-palatal suture Opening Related to Expander opening\\\" (M.O.R.E.-factor) was better with 84% in FCPC-MASPE-G than with 50% in MARPE-G.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Slow expansion with FCPC protocol effectively widens the maxilla in adults, with significant impact on bones and sutures and less pterygoid process deformation compared to rapid expansion. Cranial complications were absent in both groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00474-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00474-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项连续的回顾性研究比较了小型种植体辅助的缓慢腭扩张(MASPE)和使用骨载骨扩张器的快速腭扩张(MARPE)对狭窄上颌骨的成人的影响。CBCT扫描分析了扩张前(T1)和扩张后(T2)的横向变化和潜在的翼状突变形。材料和方法:力控多循环(FCPC)缓慢腭扩张组(FCPC- maspe - g)包括35名18-54岁的成年人,在激活扳手(力控制)处接受骨骼扩张器限制膨胀力仅为500 cN。根据fcpc协议,采用不连续、多环活化。marpe组(n = 6)在没有FCPC的情况下进行持续的RAPID激活,直到达到所需的宽度。扩张前后分别行CBCT扫描。两组的纳入标准均为无手术辅助的成功预后。结果:两组上颌骨均呈轻度v型,冠状面呈锥体状,冲击颧骨。T2处的宽度测量表明FCPC-MASPE-G具有较好的力学响应。结论:与快速扩张相比,FCPC方案的缓慢扩张有效地扩大了成人上颌骨,对骨骼和缝合线的影响显著,翼状突变形较小。两组患者均无颅内并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult maxillary expansion: CBCT evaluation of skeletal changes and determining an efficiency factor between force-controlled polycyclic slow activation and continuous rapid activation for mini-screw-assisted palatal expansion - MASPE vs. MARPE.

Aim: This consecutive retrospective study compared Mini-implant Assisted Slow Palatal Expansion (MASPE) with rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) using a bone-borne skeletal expander in adults with a narrow maxilla. CBCT scans analyzed transverse changes and potential pterygoid process deformation before (T1) and after expansion (T2).

Materials and methods: The Force Controlled PolyCyclic (FCPC) SLOW palatal expansion group (FCPC-MASPE-G) comprised 35 adults aged 18-54 years and received a skeletal expander limiting expansive force only allowing 500 cN at the activation wrench (force control). Discontinuous, polycyclic activations according to the FCPC-protocol were applied. The MARPE-group (n = 6) underwent continuous RAPID activation without FCPC until the desired width was reached. CBCT scans were taken pre and post-expansion. Inclusion criteria for both groups were successful outcomes without surgical assistance.

Results: The maxilla opened transversally in both groups mildly V-shaped, with a pyramidal shape in the coronal plane, impacting the zygomatic bone. Width measurements at T2 indicated superior mechanical response in FCPC-MASPE-G. Response of zygomaticomaxillary sutures was similar in both groups (p < 0.001 to 0.025). Pterygoid process deformations were notably less in FCPC-MASPE-G (0.87-1.35 mm, p < 0.001) compared to MARPE-G (2.70-3.04 mm, p < 0.001 to 0.009). Dental measurements were similar (p < 0.001 to 0.023), but the ratio "Mid-palatal suture Opening Related to Expander opening" (M.O.R.E.-factor) was better with 84% in FCPC-MASPE-G than with 50% in MARPE-G.

Conclusion: Slow expansion with FCPC protocol effectively widens the maxilla in adults, with significant impact on bones and sutures and less pterygoid process deformation compared to rapid expansion. Cranial complications were absent in both groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信