单肺通气技术在新生儿胸腔镜食管闭锁修复术中的应用:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446586
Fan Zhang, Zhijian Zhou, Yingbei Liu, Xuan Wang
{"title":"单肺通气技术在新生儿胸腔镜食管闭锁修复术中的应用:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Fan Zhang, Zhijian Zhou, Yingbei Liu, Xuan Wang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic repair is a common surgical procedure to treat esophageal atresia (EA). During thoracoscopic surgery, the single-lung ventilation (SLV) technique is used to collapse one of the lungs to obtain a better surgical view. However, SLV is associated with risks in neonates. This study aimed to assess the perioperative benefits and risks of SLV in neonates who underwent thoracoscopic EA repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included all neonates who underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Neonates were assigned to SLV (Group S) or dual-lung ventilation (DLV, Group D) groups depending on the technique used intraoperatively. The intraoperative and postoperative information of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 neonates were included in this study. Twenty-nine neonates were assigned to Group S and forty-one to Group D. No intraoperative adverse events were observed in either group. The surgery time of Group S was significantly shorter than that of Group D (81 ± 23 and 99 ± 29 min, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.004). In contrast, the anesthetic preparation time of Group S was significantly longer than that of Group D (54 ± 22 and 44 ± 16 min, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.030). The frequency of postoperative adverse events in Group S was similar to that of Group D (31.03% and 40.54%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.453).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLV was associated with a reduced surgery time for thoracoscopic repair of EA and longer anesthetic preparation time compared to DLV. The SLV was as safe as the DLV with potential advantages in thoracoscopic EA repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1446586"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-lung ventilation technique in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Zhang, Zhijian Zhou, Yingbei Liu, Xuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic repair is a common surgical procedure to treat esophageal atresia (EA). During thoracoscopic surgery, the single-lung ventilation (SLV) technique is used to collapse one of the lungs to obtain a better surgical view. However, SLV is associated with risks in neonates. This study aimed to assess the perioperative benefits and risks of SLV in neonates who underwent thoracoscopic EA repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective cohort study included all neonates who underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Neonates were assigned to SLV (Group S) or dual-lung ventilation (DLV, Group D) groups depending on the technique used intraoperatively. The intraoperative and postoperative information of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 neonates were included in this study. Twenty-nine neonates were assigned to Group S and forty-one to Group D. No intraoperative adverse events were observed in either group. The surgery time of Group S was significantly shorter than that of Group D (81 ± 23 and 99 ± 29 min, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.004). In contrast, the anesthetic preparation time of Group S was significantly longer than that of Group D (54 ± 22 and 44 ± 16 min, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.030). The frequency of postoperative adverse events in Group S was similar to that of Group D (31.03% and 40.54%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.453).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLV was associated with a reduced surgery time for thoracoscopic repair of EA and longer anesthetic preparation time compared to DLV. The SLV was as safe as the DLV with potential advantages in thoracoscopic EA repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1446586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611849/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1446586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸腔镜下食管闭锁修补术是治疗食管闭锁的常用手术方法。在胸腔镜手术中,单肺通气(SLV)技术用于塌陷其中一个肺以获得更好的手术视野。然而,SLV与新生儿的风险有关。本研究旨在评估接受胸腔镜EA修复术的新生儿SLV围手术期的获益和风险。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日在复旦大学儿童医院行胸腔镜下EA修补术的所有新生儿。根据术中使用的技术,将新生儿分为SLV (S组)或双肺通气(DLV, D组)组。比较两组患者术中、术后资料。结果:本研究共纳入70例新生儿。S组29例,d组41例,两组均未见术中不良事件发生。S组手术时间明显短于D组(分别为81±23 min和99±29 min, P = 0.004)。相比之下,S组麻醉准备时间明显长于D组(分别为54±22 min和44±16 min, P = 0.030)。S组术后不良事件发生率与D组相似(分别为31.03%和40.54%,P = 0.453)。结论:与DLV相比,SLV可缩短胸腔镜下EA修复手术时间,延长麻醉准备时间。SLV与DLV一样安全,在胸腔镜下EA修复中具有潜在的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-lung ventilation technique in neonates undergoing thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Background: Thoracoscopic repair is a common surgical procedure to treat esophageal atresia (EA). During thoracoscopic surgery, the single-lung ventilation (SLV) technique is used to collapse one of the lungs to obtain a better surgical view. However, SLV is associated with risks in neonates. This study aimed to assess the perioperative benefits and risks of SLV in neonates who underwent thoracoscopic EA repair.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included all neonates who underwent thoracoscopic repair of EA at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Neonates were assigned to SLV (Group S) or dual-lung ventilation (DLV, Group D) groups depending on the technique used intraoperatively. The intraoperative and postoperative information of the two groups were compared.

Results: A total of 70 neonates were included in this study. Twenty-nine neonates were assigned to Group S and forty-one to Group D. No intraoperative adverse events were observed in either group. The surgery time of Group S was significantly shorter than that of Group D (81 ± 23 and 99 ± 29 min, respectively, P = 0.004). In contrast, the anesthetic preparation time of Group S was significantly longer than that of Group D (54 ± 22 and 44 ± 16 min, respectively, P = 0.030). The frequency of postoperative adverse events in Group S was similar to that of Group D (31.03% and 40.54%, respectively, P = 0.453).

Conclusion: SLV was associated with a reduced surgery time for thoracoscopic repair of EA and longer anesthetic preparation time compared to DLV. The SLV was as safe as the DLV with potential advantages in thoracoscopic EA repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信