据报道,种族相关的控制和精神分裂症死后脑转录组差异暗示了压力相关和神经免疫途径。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnmol.2024.1450664
Shay Simmons, Keon Arbabi, Daniel Felsky, Michael Wainberg, Shreejoy J Tripathy
{"title":"据报道,种族相关的控制和精神分裂症死后脑转录组差异暗示了压力相关和神经免疫途径。","authors":"Shay Simmons, Keon Arbabi, Daniel Felsky, Michael Wainberg, Shreejoy J Tripathy","doi":"10.3389/fnmol.2024.1450664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The molecular mechanisms underlying racial disparities in schizophrenia (SCZ) illness courses and outcomes are poorly understood. While these differences are thought to arise partly through stressful social gradients, little is known about how these differences are reflected in the brain, nor how they might underlie disparate psychiatric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand the neuro-molecular correlates of social gradients, SCZ, and their overlap, we analyzed post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) RNAseq data from two racially diverse cohorts in the CommonMind Consortium (235 reported Black and 546 White, 322 SCZ cases and 459 controls) using differential expression and gene set variation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed differences in brain gene expression that were consistent across cohorts and reported race. A combined mega-analysis identified 1,514 genes with differential expression (DE) between reported race groups after accounting for diagnosis and other covariates. Functional enrichment analyses identified upregulation of genes involved in stress and immune response, highlighting the potential role of environmental differences between reported race groups. In a race-by-diagnosis interaction analysis, no individual genes passed statistical significance. However, 109 gene sets showed statistically significant differences, implicating metabolic and immune pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest molecular mechanisms uniquely perturbed across reported race groups and identify several candidate pathways associated with SCZ in a reported race-dependent manner. Our results underscore the importance of diverse cohort ascertainment to better capture population-level differences in SCZ pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12630,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1450664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reported race-associated differences in control and schizophrenia post-mortem brain transcriptomes implicate stress-related and neuroimmune pathways.\",\"authors\":\"Shay Simmons, Keon Arbabi, Daniel Felsky, Michael Wainberg, Shreejoy J Tripathy\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnmol.2024.1450664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The molecular mechanisms underlying racial disparities in schizophrenia (SCZ) illness courses and outcomes are poorly understood. While these differences are thought to arise partly through stressful social gradients, little is known about how these differences are reflected in the brain, nor how they might underlie disparate psychiatric outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand the neuro-molecular correlates of social gradients, SCZ, and their overlap, we analyzed post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) RNAseq data from two racially diverse cohorts in the CommonMind Consortium (235 reported Black and 546 White, 322 SCZ cases and 459 controls) using differential expression and gene set variation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed differences in brain gene expression that were consistent across cohorts and reported race. A combined mega-analysis identified 1,514 genes with differential expression (DE) between reported race groups after accounting for diagnosis and other covariates. Functional enrichment analyses identified upregulation of genes involved in stress and immune response, highlighting the potential role of environmental differences between reported race groups. In a race-by-diagnosis interaction analysis, no individual genes passed statistical significance. However, 109 gene sets showed statistically significant differences, implicating metabolic and immune pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest molecular mechanisms uniquely perturbed across reported race groups and identify several candidate pathways associated with SCZ in a reported race-dependent manner. Our results underscore the importance of diverse cohort ascertainment to better capture population-level differences in SCZ pathogenesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1450664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609921/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1450664\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1450664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神分裂症(SCZ)病程和结局中种族差异的分子机制尚不清楚。虽然这些差异被认为部分是由压力社会梯度引起的,但人们对这些差异是如何在大脑中反映出来的知之甚少,也不知道它们是如何成为不同精神结果的基础的。方法:为了更好地了解社会梯度、SCZ及其重叠的神经分子相关性,我们使用差异表达和基因集变异分析分析了来自CommonMind联盟中两个种族不同的队列(235例黑人和546例白人,322例SCZ病例和459例对照)的死后背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC) RNAseq数据。结果:我们观察到脑基因表达的差异在队列和报告的种族中是一致的。在考虑诊断和其他协变量后,联合大型分析确定了1514个基因在报告的种族组之间具有差异表达(DE)。功能富集分析确定了参与应激和免疫反应的基因上调,强调了所报道的种族群体之间环境差异的潜在作用。在种族诊断相互作用分析中,没有个体基因通过统计显著性。然而,109个基因组显示出统计学上的显著差异,暗示了代谢和免疫途径。结论:我们的研究结果表明,分子机制在报道的种族群体中具有独特的扰动,并确定了几种与SCZ相关的候选途径,这些途径以种族依赖的方式报道。我们的研究结果强调了确定不同队列的重要性,以便更好地了解SCZ发病机制在人群水平上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reported race-associated differences in control and schizophrenia post-mortem brain transcriptomes implicate stress-related and neuroimmune pathways.

Background: The molecular mechanisms underlying racial disparities in schizophrenia (SCZ) illness courses and outcomes are poorly understood. While these differences are thought to arise partly through stressful social gradients, little is known about how these differences are reflected in the brain, nor how they might underlie disparate psychiatric outcomes.

Methods: To better understand the neuro-molecular correlates of social gradients, SCZ, and their overlap, we analyzed post-mortem dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) RNAseq data from two racially diverse cohorts in the CommonMind Consortium (235 reported Black and 546 White, 322 SCZ cases and 459 controls) using differential expression and gene set variation analyses.

Results: We observed differences in brain gene expression that were consistent across cohorts and reported race. A combined mega-analysis identified 1,514 genes with differential expression (DE) between reported race groups after accounting for diagnosis and other covariates. Functional enrichment analyses identified upregulation of genes involved in stress and immune response, highlighting the potential role of environmental differences between reported race groups. In a race-by-diagnosis interaction analysis, no individual genes passed statistical significance. However, 109 gene sets showed statistically significant differences, implicating metabolic and immune pathways.

Conclusion: Our results suggest molecular mechanisms uniquely perturbed across reported race groups and identify several candidate pathways associated with SCZ in a reported race-dependent manner. Our results underscore the importance of diverse cohort ascertainment to better capture population-level differences in SCZ pathogenesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
669
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to identifying key molecules, as well as their functions and interactions, that underlie the structure, design and function of the brain across all levels. The scope of our journal encompasses synaptic and cellular proteins, coding and non-coding RNA, and molecular mechanisms regulating cellular and dendritic RNA translation. In recent years, a plethora of new cellular and synaptic players have been identified from reduced systems, such as neuronal cultures, but the relevance of these molecules in terms of cellular and synaptic function and plasticity in the living brain and its circuits has not been validated. The effects of spine growth and density observed using gene products identified from in vitro work are frequently not reproduced in vivo. Our journal is particularly interested in studies on genetically engineered model organisms (C. elegans, Drosophila, mouse), in which alterations in key molecules underlying cellular and synaptic function and plasticity produce defined anatomical, physiological and behavioral changes. In the mouse, genetic alterations limited to particular neural circuits (olfactory bulb, motor cortex, cortical layers, hippocampal subfields, cerebellum), preferably regulated in time and on demand, are of special interest, as they sidestep potential compensatory developmental effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信