在结直肠手术中使用增强恢复方案会增加术后出血并发症吗?

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eyal Aviran, Dan Assaf, Karen Zaghiyan, Phillip Fleshner
{"title":"在结直肠手术中使用增强恢复方案会增加术后出血并发症吗?","authors":"Eyal Aviran, Dan Assaf, Karen Zaghiyan, Phillip Fleshner","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal perioperative care pathways shown to improve postoperative complications and decrease length of stay after surgery. A critical component of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is the use of multimodal non-opiate analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding between patients treated with and without an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospective maintained colorectal registry.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Large colorectal referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Preoperative elective colorectal surgery requiring an anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Standardized enhanced recovery after surgery protocol included celecoxib and ketorolac.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Postoperative outcomes included bleeding (+/- sequelae), reduction in hematocrit after operation, intervention for bleeding (transfusion, endoscopy or surgery), length of stay and hospital readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enhanced recovery after surgery group (n = 630) and non-enhanced recovery after surgery groups (n = 739) were comparable in baseline clinical features except for surgical indication, with more inflammatory bowel disease and less malignant disease in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Minimally invasive surgery was more commonly performed in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Both bleeding with sequelae (p < 0.0001) and bleeding without sequelae (p = 0.0004) were significantly more common in the enhanced recovery after surgery group compared to the non-enhanced recovery after surgery group. In addition, there was a significantly larger hematocrit decline after operation noted in the enhanced recovery after surgery group (p < 0.0001). Both the need for transfusion and intervention for bleeding however did not significantly differ between patient groups. Factors associated with bleeding were the use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (OR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.57-5.58; p < 0.001) and performing a small to large bowel anastomosis (OR= 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.81; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Retrospective observational design and inability to determine which component of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol caused the bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an anastomosis is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding without significant difference in the need for transfusion or intervention. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the Use of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Increased Postoperative Bleeding Complications?\",\"authors\":\"Eyal Aviran, Dan Assaf, Karen Zaghiyan, Phillip Fleshner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal perioperative care pathways shown to improve postoperative complications and decrease length of stay after surgery. A critical component of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is the use of multimodal non-opiate analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding between patients treated with and without an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review of a prospective maintained colorectal registry.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Large colorectal referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Preoperative elective colorectal surgery requiring an anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Standardized enhanced recovery after surgery protocol included celecoxib and ketorolac.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Postoperative outcomes included bleeding (+/- sequelae), reduction in hematocrit after operation, intervention for bleeding (transfusion, endoscopy or surgery), length of stay and hospital readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enhanced recovery after surgery group (n = 630) and non-enhanced recovery after surgery groups (n = 739) were comparable in baseline clinical features except for surgical indication, with more inflammatory bowel disease and less malignant disease in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Minimally invasive surgery was more commonly performed in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Both bleeding with sequelae (p < 0.0001) and bleeding without sequelae (p = 0.0004) were significantly more common in the enhanced recovery after surgery group compared to the non-enhanced recovery after surgery group. In addition, there was a significantly larger hematocrit decline after operation noted in the enhanced recovery after surgery group (p < 0.0001). Both the need for transfusion and intervention for bleeding however did not significantly differ between patient groups. Factors associated with bleeding were the use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (OR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.57-5.58; p < 0.001) and performing a small to large bowel anastomosis (OR= 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.81; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Retrospective observational design and inability to determine which component of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol caused the bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an anastomosis is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding without significant difference in the need for transfusion or intervention. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003581\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案是一种多模式围手术期护理途径,可改善术后并发症并缩短术后住院时间。增强术后恢复方案的一个关键组成部分是使用非甾体抗炎药和COX-2抑制剂的多模式非阿片类镇痛。目的:比较采用和不采用增强术后恢复方案的患者术后消化道出血的发生率。设计:前瞻性维持结直肠登记的回顾性研究。环境:大型结直肠转诊中心。患者:术前择期结肠手术需要吻合。干预:标准化的术后增强恢复方案包括塞来昔布和酮罗拉酸。主要结局:术后结局包括出血(+/-后遗症)、术后红细胞压积降低、出血干预(输血、内镜检查或手术)、住院时间和再入院。结果:除手术指征外,术后增强恢复组(n = 630)与非术后增强恢复组(n = 739)的基线临床特征具有可比性,术后增强恢复组炎症性肠病较多,恶性疾病较少。术后恢复增强组多采用微创手术。有后遗症出血(p < 0.0001)和无后遗症出血(p = 0.0004)在术后恢复增强组明显高于无后遗症恢复增强组。此外,术后恢复增强组术后红细胞压积下降明显更大(p < 0.0001)。然而,输血和出血干预的需要在患者组之间没有显着差异。与出血相关的因素是使用增强术后恢复方案(OR = 2.96;95% ci, 1.57-5.58;p < 0.001),进行小肠与大肠吻合(OR= 2.68;95% ci, 1.49-4.81;P < 0.001)。局限性:回顾性观察设计,无法确定术后增强恢复方案的哪个组成部分导致出血。结论:在结直肠吻合术患者中使用术后增强恢复方案与出血发生率增加相关,在输血或干预需求方面无显著差异。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Has the Use of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Colorectal Surgery Increased Postoperative Bleeding Complications?

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are multimodal perioperative care pathways shown to improve postoperative complications and decrease length of stay after surgery. A critical component of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol is the use of multimodal non-opiate analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors.

Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding between patients treated with and without an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

Design: Retrospective review of a prospective maintained colorectal registry.

Settings: Large colorectal referral center.

Patients: Preoperative elective colorectal surgery requiring an anastomosis.

Intervention: Standardized enhanced recovery after surgery protocol included celecoxib and ketorolac.

Main outcome: Postoperative outcomes included bleeding (+/- sequelae), reduction in hematocrit after operation, intervention for bleeding (transfusion, endoscopy or surgery), length of stay and hospital readmission.

Results: The enhanced recovery after surgery group (n = 630) and non-enhanced recovery after surgery groups (n = 739) were comparable in baseline clinical features except for surgical indication, with more inflammatory bowel disease and less malignant disease in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Minimally invasive surgery was more commonly performed in the enhanced recovery after surgery group. Both bleeding with sequelae (p < 0.0001) and bleeding without sequelae (p = 0.0004) were significantly more common in the enhanced recovery after surgery group compared to the non-enhanced recovery after surgery group. In addition, there was a significantly larger hematocrit decline after operation noted in the enhanced recovery after surgery group (p < 0.0001). Both the need for transfusion and intervention for bleeding however did not significantly differ between patient groups. Factors associated with bleeding were the use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (OR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.57-5.58; p < 0.001) and performing a small to large bowel anastomosis (OR= 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.81; p < 0.001).

Limitation: Retrospective observational design and inability to determine which component of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol caused the bleeding.

Conclusion: Use of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an anastomosis is associated with an increased incidence of bleeding without significant difference in the need for transfusion or intervention. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信