剧烈的心率钳运动不会引起推荐的耗氧量。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2
Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom
{"title":"剧烈的心率钳运动不会引起推荐的耗氧量。","authors":"Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) demands as well as minute ventilation ( <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HR<sub>L</sub> = 77% HR<sub>peak</sub>), middle (HR<sub>M</sub> = 86% HR<sub>peak</sub>), and higher (HR<sub>H</sub> = 95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The times to exhaustion (T<sub>lim</sub>) for the HR<sub>L</sub>, HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>H</sub> trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> , and <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HR<sub>L</sub> than HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>L</sub> and HR<sub>M</sub> were lower than HR<sub>H</sub>. The mean <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> (HR<sub>L</sub> = 56.7 ± 3.8, HR<sub>M</sub> = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HR<sub>H</sub> = 90.5 ± 3.3% <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ) responses fell below the recommended <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> range for vigorous exercise at 10%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>L</sub>, and at 90%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>M</sub>, but remained above the recommended V̇O<sub>2</sub> range for vigorous exercise until 70% of T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>H</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only the HR<sub>M</sub> trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1205-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vigorous intensity heart rate-clamp exercise does not elicit recommended oxygen consumption rates.\",\"authors\":\"Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) demands as well as minute ventilation ( <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HR<sub>L</sub> = 77% HR<sub>peak</sub>), middle (HR<sub>M</sub> = 86% HR<sub>peak</sub>), and higher (HR<sub>H</sub> = 95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The times to exhaustion (T<sub>lim</sub>) for the HR<sub>L</sub>, HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>H</sub> trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> , and <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HR<sub>L</sub> than HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>L</sub> and HR<sub>M</sub> were lower than HR<sub>H</sub>. The mean <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> (HR<sub>L</sub> = 56.7 ± 3.8, HR<sub>M</sub> = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HR<sub>H</sub> = 90.5 ± 3.3% <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ) responses fell below the recommended <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> range for vigorous exercise at 10%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>L</sub>, and at 90%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>M</sub>, but remained above the recommended V̇O<sub>2</sub> range for vigorous exercise until 70% of T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>H</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only the HR<sub>M</sub> trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1205-1218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了在剧烈运动强度(77-95% HRpeak)心率(HR)-钳形周期测量中,能量输出的调整和代谢(V O2)需求、分钟通气量(V˙E)、呼吸速率(RR)和感知运动强度(RPE)反应等级的变化。方法:15名男性(平均±SD年龄= 25.9±4.4岁)进行了分级运动试验,以确定峰值参数,并在剧烈运动强度范围的低(HRL = 77% HRpeak)、中(HRL = 86% HRpeak)和高(HRH = 95% HRpeak)进行了三次随机排序的HRL -clamp试验,以达到60分钟的疲劳。考察了变化的时间进程。结果:HRL、HRM和HRH试验的疲劳时间(lim)分别为56.05±10.09、44.22±19.00和9.74±7.54 min。每次试验的功率输出、V˙o2和V˙E随时间的变化均显著降低,但RR没有变化,RPE (p L)比HRM升高,HRL和HRM均低于HRH。平均V˙O2 (HRL = 56.7±3.8,HRM = 68.1±4.3,HRH = 90.5±3.3% V˙O2 max)反应在HRL为10%时低于剧烈运动推荐的V˙O2范围,HRM为90%时低于剧烈运动推荐的V˙O2范围,但在HRH为70%时仍高于剧烈运动推荐的V˙O2范围。结论:只有HRM试验符合目前的指导方针,即持续至少20分钟的剧烈强度V˙o2。这项研究表明,hr钳形运动不能始终如一地用于规定单次运动所需的代谢刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vigorous intensity heart rate-clamp exercise does not elicit recommended oxygen consumption rates.

Purpose: This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O2) demands as well as minute ventilation ( V ˙ E ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HRpeak) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.

Methods: Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HRL = 77% HRpeak), middle (HRM = 86% HRpeak), and higher (HRH = 95% HRpeak) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.

Results: The times to exhaustion (Tlim) for the HRL, HRM, and HRH trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, V ˙ O 2 , and V ˙ E across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HRL than HRM, and HRL and HRM were lower than HRH. The mean V ˙ O 2 (HRL = 56.7 ± 3.8, HRM = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HRH = 90.5 ± 3.3% V ˙ O 2max ) responses fell below the recommended V ˙ O 2 range for vigorous exercise at 10%Tlim for HRL, and at 90%Tlim for HRM, but remained above the recommended V̇O2 range for vigorous exercise until 70% of Tlim for HRH.

Conclusions: Only the HRM trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity V ˙ O 2 sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信