Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom
{"title":"剧烈的心率钳运动不会引起推荐的耗氧量。","authors":"Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) demands as well as minute ventilation ( <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HR<sub>L</sub> = 77% HR<sub>peak</sub>), middle (HR<sub>M</sub> = 86% HR<sub>peak</sub>), and higher (HR<sub>H</sub> = 95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The times to exhaustion (T<sub>lim</sub>) for the HR<sub>L</sub>, HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>H</sub> trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> , and <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HR<sub>L</sub> than HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>L</sub> and HR<sub>M</sub> were lower than HR<sub>H</sub>. The mean <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> (HR<sub>L</sub> = 56.7 ± 3.8, HR<sub>M</sub> = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HR<sub>H</sub> = 90.5 ± 3.3% <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ) responses fell below the recommended <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> range for vigorous exercise at 10%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>L</sub>, and at 90%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>M</sub>, but remained above the recommended V̇O<sub>2</sub> range for vigorous exercise until 70% of T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>H</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only the HR<sub>M</sub> trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1205-1218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vigorous intensity heart rate-clamp exercise does not elicit recommended oxygen consumption rates.\",\"authors\":\"Clara J Mitchinson, Djadmann Gustave, Pasquale J Succi, Brian Benitez, Minyoung Kwak, Haley C Bergstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) demands as well as minute ventilation ( <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HR<sub>L</sub> = 77% HR<sub>peak</sub>), middle (HR<sub>M</sub> = 86% HR<sub>peak</sub>), and higher (HR<sub>H</sub> = 95% HR<sub>peak</sub>) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The times to exhaustion (T<sub>lim</sub>) for the HR<sub>L</sub>, HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>H</sub> trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> , and <math> <msub><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>E</mtext></msub> </math> across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HR<sub>L</sub> than HR<sub>M</sub>, and HR<sub>L</sub> and HR<sub>M</sub> were lower than HR<sub>H</sub>. The mean <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> (HR<sub>L</sub> = 56.7 ± 3.8, HR<sub>M</sub> = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HR<sub>H</sub> = 90.5 ± 3.3% <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mtext>2max</mtext></msub> </math> ) responses fell below the recommended <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> range for vigorous exercise at 10%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>L</sub>, and at 90%T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>M</sub>, but remained above the recommended V̇O<sub>2</sub> range for vigorous exercise until 70% of T<sub>lim</sub> for HR<sub>H</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only the HR<sub>M</sub> trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity <math> <msub> <mrow><mover><mtext>V</mtext> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <mtext>O</mtext></mrow> <mn>2</mn></msub> </math> sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1205-1218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05665-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vigorous intensity heart rate-clamp exercise does not elicit recommended oxygen consumption rates.
Purpose: This study examined the power output adjustments and subsequent shifts in metabolic (V̇O2) demands as well as minute ventilation ( ), respiratory rate (RR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) responses during vigorous intensity (77-95% HRpeak) heart rate (HR)-clamp cycle ergometry.
Methods: Fifteen males (mean ± SD age = 25.9 ± 4.4 years) performed a graded exercise test to exhaustion to determine peak parameters and three, randomly ordered, HR-clamp trials to exhaustion, up to 60 min, at the lower (HRL = 77% HRpeak), middle (HRM = 86% HRpeak), and higher (HRH = 95% HRpeak) end of the vigorous intensity range. Time course of changes were examined.
Results: The times to exhaustion (Tlim) for the HRL, HRM, and HRH trials were 56.05 ± 10.09, 44.22 ± 19.00, and 9.74 ± 7.54 min, respectively. There were significant decreases in power output, , and across time for each trial, but no changes in RR, and increases in RPE (p < 0.05). Responses were intensity specific for all variables such that mean values were lower for HRL than HRM, and HRL and HRM were lower than HRH. The mean (HRL = 56.7 ± 3.8, HRM = 68.1 ± 4.3, and HRH = 90.5 ± 3.3% ) responses fell below the recommended range for vigorous exercise at 10%Tlim for HRL, and at 90%Tlim for HRM, but remained above the recommended V̇O2 range for vigorous exercise until 70% of Tlim for HRH.
Conclusions: Only the HRM trial met the current guidelines of a vigorous intensity sustained for at least 20 min. This study indicated that HR-clamp exercise cannot be consistently used to prescribe a desired metabolic stimulus for exercise performed in a single session.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.