临床单侧msamniires病的表型分布及疗效分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Yongjia Chen, Xinzhang Cai, Yulu Zhang, Chufeng He, Xuewen Wu, Lu Jiang, Hongsheng Chen, Jing Liu, Bo Pang, Shuai Zhang, Anhai Chen, Mengzhu Jiang, Huping Huang, Yijiang Bai, Zequn Nie, Lingyun Mei
{"title":"临床单侧msamniires病的表型分布及疗效分析。","authors":"Yongjia Chen,&nbsp;Xinzhang Cai,&nbsp;Yulu Zhang,&nbsp;Chufeng He,&nbsp;Xuewen Wu,&nbsp;Lu Jiang,&nbsp;Hongsheng Chen,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Bo Pang,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Anhai Chen,&nbsp;Mengzhu Jiang,&nbsp;Huping Huang,&nbsp;Yijiang Bai,&nbsp;Zequn Nie,&nbsp;Lingyun Mei","doi":"10.1111/coa.14264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The first purpose of this study was to ascertain the distribution of unilateral Ménière's disease (MD) clinical subgroups in China and compare with the population reported in Europe and the United States. The second purpose was to investigate the effectiveness in different clinical phenotypes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were categorised into one of five subtypes using a previously reported classification scheme based on cluster analysis. The distribution and clinical characteristics were analysed and compared with the two cohorts reported in Europe and the United States. Participants were followed up to observe the therapeutic effectiveness over a 2-year period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 245 patients diagnosed with UMD were enrolled in the study, with 84 of these participants providing complete and detailed follow-up data. All of the unilateral MD patients were accurately classified: 58.0% were classic MD, 25.7% were delayed MD, 1.2% was familial MD, 12.7% were sporadic MD with migraine and 2.4% were autoimmune MD. Our findings revealed a significant difference in the distribution between this cohort and the European cohort. Follow-up assessments revealed worse vertigo control rate in the patients with migraine compared to the classical MD (50.0% vs. 82.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.034).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The distribution of unilateral MD subtypes in this Chinese population differs from that in the European population, and the therapeutic effectiveness varies across subtypes in this cohort. Our study highlights the importance of the clinical heterogeneity in unilateral MD, and further studies are needed to identify the optimal interventions for specific subgroups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 2","pages":"336-343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Distribution and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Clinical Unilateral Ménière's Disease Phenotypes\",\"authors\":\"Yongjia Chen,&nbsp;Xinzhang Cai,&nbsp;Yulu Zhang,&nbsp;Chufeng He,&nbsp;Xuewen Wu,&nbsp;Lu Jiang,&nbsp;Hongsheng Chen,&nbsp;Jing Liu,&nbsp;Bo Pang,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Anhai Chen,&nbsp;Mengzhu Jiang,&nbsp;Huping Huang,&nbsp;Yijiang Bai,&nbsp;Zequn Nie,&nbsp;Lingyun Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The first purpose of this study was to ascertain the distribution of unilateral Ménière's disease (MD) clinical subgroups in China and compare with the population reported in Europe and the United States. The second purpose was to investigate the effectiveness in different clinical phenotypes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants were categorised into one of five subtypes using a previously reported classification scheme based on cluster analysis. The distribution and clinical characteristics were analysed and compared with the two cohorts reported in Europe and the United States. Participants were followed up to observe the therapeutic effectiveness over a 2-year period.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 245 patients diagnosed with UMD were enrolled in the study, with 84 of these participants providing complete and detailed follow-up data. All of the unilateral MD patients were accurately classified: 58.0% were classic MD, 25.7% were delayed MD, 1.2% was familial MD, 12.7% were sporadic MD with migraine and 2.4% were autoimmune MD. Our findings revealed a significant difference in the distribution between this cohort and the European cohort. Follow-up assessments revealed worse vertigo control rate in the patients with migraine compared to the classical MD (50.0% vs. 82.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.034).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The distribution of unilateral MD subtypes in this Chinese population differs from that in the European population, and the therapeutic effectiveness varies across subtypes in this cohort. Our study highlights the importance of the clinical heterogeneity in unilateral MD, and further studies are needed to identify the optimal interventions for specific subgroups.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"336-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14264\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的第一个目的是确定中国单侧membroni病(MD)临床亚群的分布,并与欧洲和美国报道的人群进行比较。第二个目的是研究不同临床表型的有效性。方法:使用先前报道的基于聚类分析的分类方案,将参与者分为五种亚型之一。分析其分布和临床特征,并与欧洲和美国报道的两个队列进行比较。随访2年观察治疗效果。结果:共有245名诊断为UMD的患者入组研究,其中84名参与者提供了完整详细的随访数据。所有单侧MD患者均被准确分类:58.0%为经典MD, 25.7%为延迟性MD, 1.2%为家族性MD, 12.7%为散发性MD伴偏头痛,2.4%为自身免疫性MD。我们的研究结果显示,该队列与欧洲队列的分布有显著差异。随访评估显示,与经典MD相比,偏头痛患者的眩晕控制率更差(50.0%比82.6%,p = 0.034)。结论:中国人群的单侧MD亚型分布与欧洲人群不同,该队列中不同亚型的治疗效果不同。我们的研究强调了单侧MD临床异质性的重要性,需要进一步的研究来确定针对特定亚组的最佳干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Distribution and Therapeutic Effectiveness of Clinical Unilateral Ménière's Disease Phenotypes

Objectives

The first purpose of this study was to ascertain the distribution of unilateral Ménière's disease (MD) clinical subgroups in China and compare with the population reported in Europe and the United States. The second purpose was to investigate the effectiveness in different clinical phenotypes.

Methods

Participants were categorised into one of five subtypes using a previously reported classification scheme based on cluster analysis. The distribution and clinical characteristics were analysed and compared with the two cohorts reported in Europe and the United States. Participants were followed up to observe the therapeutic effectiveness over a 2-year period.

Results

A total of 245 patients diagnosed with UMD were enrolled in the study, with 84 of these participants providing complete and detailed follow-up data. All of the unilateral MD patients were accurately classified: 58.0% were classic MD, 25.7% were delayed MD, 1.2% was familial MD, 12.7% were sporadic MD with migraine and 2.4% were autoimmune MD. Our findings revealed a significant difference in the distribution between this cohort and the European cohort. Follow-up assessments revealed worse vertigo control rate in the patients with migraine compared to the classical MD (50.0% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.034).

Conclusion

The distribution of unilateral MD subtypes in this Chinese population differs from that in the European population, and the therapeutic effectiveness varies across subtypes in this cohort. Our study highlights the importance of the clinical heterogeneity in unilateral MD, and further studies are needed to identify the optimal interventions for specific subgroups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Otolaryngology
Clinical Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with: current otorhinolaryngological practice audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL head and neck oncology head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery continuing medical education and ORL training The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research. Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject. • Negative/null results In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信