[获得堕胎护理的障碍:从意外怀孕妇女的角度分析-来自ELSA研究的发现]。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daphne Hahn, Rona Torenz, Ines Thonke, Sarah Eckardt, Maria Schneider, Anke Wyrobisch-Krüger, Ulrike Busch, Cornelia Helfferich, Tilmann Knittel, Maika Böhm, Petra Brzank, Christine Knaevelsrud, Silvia Krumm, Sarah Schumacher
{"title":"[获得堕胎护理的障碍:从意外怀孕妇女的角度分析-来自ELSA研究的发现]。","authors":"Daphne Hahn, Rona Torenz, Ines Thonke, Sarah Eckardt, Maria Schneider, Anke Wyrobisch-Krüger, Ulrike Busch, Cornelia Helfferich, Tilmann Knittel, Maika Böhm, Petra Brzank, Christine Knaevelsrud, Silvia Krumm, Sarah Schumacher","doi":"10.1007/s00103-024-03987-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Barriers to accessing abortion care can delay access to services, which can lead to delayed abortion and health risks. Barriers include geographical accessibility, confidentiality, waiting times, stigmatization, poor or inaccessible information and the cost of abortion. This article examines barriers to accessing abortion care in Germany. This includes barriers in the availability and accessibility of care services, access to information, costs associated with abortion and organisational barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analyses are based on data from an online cross-sectional survey of 594 women in Germany who had an unwanted pregnancy terminated, which was conducted as part of the ELSA Study in 2021 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that access to abortion care in Germany is associated with various barriers for many women. Of the respondents, 80.1% reported at least one barrier to accessing abortion, 65.5% reported more than two barriers and 40.5% reported three or more barriers. In particular, the non-disclosure of the procedure and the associated fear of stigmatisation represented hurdles for many participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The results of the study underline the need to improve access to safe abortions. Reducing access barriers therefore includes the decriminalisation of abortion, a comprehensive care structure, financial support services, improved information services and the reduction of stigmatisation and discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Barriers to accessing abortion care: an analysis from the perspective of unintended pregnant women-findings from the ELSA study].\",\"authors\":\"Daphne Hahn, Rona Torenz, Ines Thonke, Sarah Eckardt, Maria Schneider, Anke Wyrobisch-Krüger, Ulrike Busch, Cornelia Helfferich, Tilmann Knittel, Maika Böhm, Petra Brzank, Christine Knaevelsrud, Silvia Krumm, Sarah Schumacher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00103-024-03987-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Barriers to accessing abortion care can delay access to services, which can lead to delayed abortion and health risks. Barriers include geographical accessibility, confidentiality, waiting times, stigmatization, poor or inaccessible information and the cost of abortion. This article examines barriers to accessing abortion care in Germany. This includes barriers in the availability and accessibility of care services, access to information, costs associated with abortion and organisational barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analyses are based on data from an online cross-sectional survey of 594 women in Germany who had an unwanted pregnancy terminated, which was conducted as part of the ELSA Study in 2021 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicate that access to abortion care in Germany is associated with various barriers for many women. Of the respondents, 80.1% reported at least one barrier to accessing abortion, 65.5% reported more than two barriers and 40.5% reported three or more barriers. In particular, the non-disclosure of the procedure and the associated fear of stigmatisation represented hurdles for many participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The results of the study underline the need to improve access to safe abortions. Reducing access barriers therefore includes the decriminalisation of abortion, a comprehensive care structure, financial support services, improved information services and the reduction of stigmatisation and discrimination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"28-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732912/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-024-03987-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-024-03987-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:获得堕胎护理方面的障碍可能会延误获得服务的时间,从而导致堕胎延迟和健康风险。障碍包括地理上的可达性、保密性、等待时间、污名化、贫乏或难以获得的信息以及堕胎费用。这篇文章探讨了在德国获得堕胎护理的障碍。这包括在提供和获得护理服务、获取信息、与堕胎有关的费用和组织障碍方面的障碍。方法:分析基于对德国594名意外怀孕终止的女性进行的在线横断面调查的数据,该调查是2021年和2022年ELSA研究的一部分。结果:研究结果表明,在德国获得堕胎护理与许多妇女的各种障碍有关。在受访者中,80.1%报告至少有一个堕胎障碍,65.5%报告两个以上障碍,40.5%报告三个或更多障碍。特别是,对程序的不披露和与之相关的对污名化的恐惧是许多参与者面临的障碍。讨论和结论:研究结果强调需要改善获得安全堕胎的机会。因此,减少获取障碍包括堕胎非刑事化、全面护理结构、财政支持服务、改进信息服务以及减少污名化和歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Barriers to accessing abortion care: an analysis from the perspective of unintended pregnant women-findings from the ELSA study].

Introduction: Barriers to accessing abortion care can delay access to services, which can lead to delayed abortion and health risks. Barriers include geographical accessibility, confidentiality, waiting times, stigmatization, poor or inaccessible information and the cost of abortion. This article examines barriers to accessing abortion care in Germany. This includes barriers in the availability and accessibility of care services, access to information, costs associated with abortion and organisational barriers.

Methods: The analyses are based on data from an online cross-sectional survey of 594 women in Germany who had an unwanted pregnancy terminated, which was conducted as part of the ELSA Study in 2021 and 2022.

Results: The findings indicate that access to abortion care in Germany is associated with various barriers for many women. Of the respondents, 80.1% reported at least one barrier to accessing abortion, 65.5% reported more than two barriers and 40.5% reported three or more barriers. In particular, the non-disclosure of the procedure and the associated fear of stigmatisation represented hurdles for many participants.

Discussion and conclusion: The results of the study underline the need to improve access to safe abortions. Reducing access barriers therefore includes the decriminalisation of abortion, a comprehensive care structure, financial support services, improved information services and the reduction of stigmatisation and discrimination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信