Natalie Hann Soh, Charles Rong Zhang Yau, Xi Zhi Low, Hanis Abdul Kadir, Wei Jing Fong, Mothi Babu Ramalingam, Pei Ling Tan, Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Ya Ting Hsing, Mingzhe Cai, Chin Jin Seo, Johnny Chin-Ann Ong, Claramae S Chia, Jolene Si Min Wong
{"title":"接受腹部大手术的肿瘤外科患者的康复预后:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Natalie Hann Soh, Charles Rong Zhang Yau, Xi Zhi Low, Hanis Abdul Kadir, Wei Jing Fong, Mothi Babu Ramalingam, Pei Ling Tan, Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Ya Ting Hsing, Mingzhe Cai, Chin Jin Seo, Johnny Chin-Ann Ong, Claramae S Chia, Jolene Si Min Wong","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-16527-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation has been increasingly utilized to optimize perioperative outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative outcomes among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were systematically searched up until December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to standard of care in surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary outcome was functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, emergency readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We stratified our findings to determine the impact of uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 studies with 2532 surgical oncology patients. Overall, patients undergoing prehabilitation demonstrated a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity compared to those without prehabilitation (mean difference in 6MWD 28.32 meters [m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01). Prehabilitation was also associated with significantly lower odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01). There was no difference in emergency readmission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61) or LOS (mean difference -0.42 days, 95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15). Comparing uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation, multimodal prehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity (6MWD 37.35 m versus 13.38 m) and lower odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 versus OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10) CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation improves functional capacity and reduces postoperative complications among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1236-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehabilitation Outcomes in Surgical Oncology Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Hann Soh, Charles Rong Zhang Yau, Xi Zhi Low, Hanis Abdul Kadir, Wei Jing Fong, Mothi Babu Ramalingam, Pei Ling Tan, Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Ya Ting Hsing, Mingzhe Cai, Chin Jin Seo, Johnny Chin-Ann Ong, Claramae S Chia, Jolene Si Min Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-024-16527-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation has been increasingly utilized to optimize perioperative outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative outcomes among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were systematically searched up until December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to standard of care in surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary outcome was functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, emergency readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We stratified our findings to determine the impact of uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 studies with 2532 surgical oncology patients. Overall, patients undergoing prehabilitation demonstrated a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity compared to those without prehabilitation (mean difference in 6MWD 28.32 meters [m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01). Prehabilitation was also associated with significantly lower odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01). There was no difference in emergency readmission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61) or LOS (mean difference -0.42 days, 95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15). Comparing uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation, multimodal prehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity (6MWD 37.35 m versus 13.38 m) and lower odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 versus OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10) CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation improves functional capacity and reduces postoperative complications among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1236-1247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16527-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16527-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:康复治疗已越来越多地用于优化围手术期预后。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估单模式和多模式康复对接受腹部大手术的肿瘤外科患者的功能能力和术后结局的影响。患者和方法:系统检索三个电子数据库(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane),截止到2023年12月。我们纳入了随机对照试验,比较接受腹部大手术的肿瘤外科患者的康复与标准治疗。我们的主要结果是通过6分钟步行距离(6MWD)测量功能能力。次要结局包括术后并发症、急诊再入院和住院时间(LOS)。我们对研究结果进行了分层,以确定单模式与多模式康复对结果的影响。结果:我们纳入了27项研究,共2532例外科肿瘤患者。总体而言,接受预康复治疗的患者术前功能能力较未接受预康复治疗的患者有显著改善(6MWD平均差28.32米[m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01)。预适应也与术后并发症发生率显著降低相关(优势比[OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01)。急诊再入院(OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61)或LOS(平均差-0.42天,95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15)无差异。单模式预适应与多模式预适应相比,多模式预适应与功能能力的改善更大(6MWD 37.35 m vs 13.38 m)和更低的术后并发症发生率相关(OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 vs OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10)结论:预适应改善了外科肿瘤患者的功能能力,减少了术后并发症。
Prehabilitation Outcomes in Surgical Oncology Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.
Background: Prehabilitation has been increasingly utilized to optimize perioperative outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative outcomes among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Patients and methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were systematically searched up until December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to standard of care in surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary outcome was functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, emergency readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We stratified our findings to determine the impact of uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes.
Results: We included 27 studies with 2532 surgical oncology patients. Overall, patients undergoing prehabilitation demonstrated a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity compared to those without prehabilitation (mean difference in 6MWD 28.32 meters [m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01). Prehabilitation was also associated with significantly lower odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01). There was no difference in emergency readmission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61) or LOS (mean difference -0.42 days, 95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15). Comparing uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation, multimodal prehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity (6MWD 37.35 m versus 13.38 m) and lower odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 versus OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10) CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation improves functional capacity and reduces postoperative complications among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.