对杏仁核和精神疾病的诚实清算。

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Andrew S Fox, Alexander J Shackman
{"title":"对杏仁核和精神疾病的诚实清算。","authors":"Andrew S Fox, Alexander J Shackman","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20240941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are a leading source of human misery, morbidity, and premature mortality. Existing treatments are far from curative for many, underscoring the need to clarify the underlying neural mechanisms. Although many brain regions contribute, the amygdala has received the most intense scientific attention. Over the past several decades, this scrutiny has yielded a detailed understanding of amygdala function, but it has failed to produce new clinical assays, biomarkers, or cures. Rising to this urgent public health challenge demands an honest reckoning with the functional-neuroanatomical complexity of the amygdala and a shift from theories anchored on \"the amygdala\" to models centered on specific amygdala nuclei and cell types. This review begins by examining evidence from studies of rodents, monkeys, and humans for the \"canonical model,\" the idea that the amygdala plays a central role in fear- and anxiety-related states, traits, and disorders. Next, the authors selectively highlight work indicating that the canonical model, while true, is overly simplistic and fails to adequately capture the actual state of the evidentiary record, the breadth of amygdala-associated functions and illnesses, or the complexity of the amygdala's functional architecture. The authors describe the implications of these facts for basic and clinical neuroimaging research. The review concludes with some general recommendations for grappling with the complexity of the amygdala and accelerating efforts to understand and more effectively treat amygdala-related psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"181 12","pages":"1059-1075"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Honest Reckoning With the Amygdala and Mental Illness.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S Fox, Alexander J Shackman\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ajp.20240941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anxiety disorders are a leading source of human misery, morbidity, and premature mortality. Existing treatments are far from curative for many, underscoring the need to clarify the underlying neural mechanisms. Although many brain regions contribute, the amygdala has received the most intense scientific attention. Over the past several decades, this scrutiny has yielded a detailed understanding of amygdala function, but it has failed to produce new clinical assays, biomarkers, or cures. Rising to this urgent public health challenge demands an honest reckoning with the functional-neuroanatomical complexity of the amygdala and a shift from theories anchored on \\\"the amygdala\\\" to models centered on specific amygdala nuclei and cell types. This review begins by examining evidence from studies of rodents, monkeys, and humans for the \\\"canonical model,\\\" the idea that the amygdala plays a central role in fear- and anxiety-related states, traits, and disorders. Next, the authors selectively highlight work indicating that the canonical model, while true, is overly simplistic and fails to adequately capture the actual state of the evidentiary record, the breadth of amygdala-associated functions and illnesses, or the complexity of the amygdala's functional architecture. The authors describe the implications of these facts for basic and clinical neuroimaging research. The review concludes with some general recommendations for grappling with the complexity of the amygdala and accelerating efforts to understand and more effectively treat amygdala-related psychopathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"181 12\",\"pages\":\"1059-1075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11611071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20240941\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20240941","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

焦虑症是人类痛苦、发病率和过早死亡的主要来源。现有的治疗方法远远不能治愈许多人,强调需要澄清潜在的神经机制。尽管大脑的许多区域都有贡献,但杏仁核受到了最强烈的科学关注。在过去的几十年里,这种审查已经产生了对杏仁核功能的详细了解,但它未能产生新的临床分析,生物标志物或治疗方法。面对这一紧迫的公共卫生挑战,需要对杏仁核的功能-神经解剖学复杂性进行诚实的清算,并从以“杏仁核”为基础的理论转向以特定杏仁核和细胞类型为中心的模型。这篇综述首先通过对啮齿动物、猴子和人类的研究来检验“规范模型”的证据,该模型认为杏仁核在与恐惧和焦虑相关的状态、特征和障碍中起着核心作用。接下来,作者有选择性地强调了一些工作,这些工作表明,规范模型虽然是正确的,但过于简单,未能充分捕捉到证据记录的实际状态,杏仁核相关功能和疾病的广度,或杏仁核功能结构的复杂性。作者描述了这些事实对基础和临床神经影像学研究的影响。这篇综述总结了一些一般性的建议,以解决杏仁核的复杂性,加快努力理解和更有效地治疗杏仁核相关的精神病理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Honest Reckoning With the Amygdala and Mental Illness.

Anxiety disorders are a leading source of human misery, morbidity, and premature mortality. Existing treatments are far from curative for many, underscoring the need to clarify the underlying neural mechanisms. Although many brain regions contribute, the amygdala has received the most intense scientific attention. Over the past several decades, this scrutiny has yielded a detailed understanding of amygdala function, but it has failed to produce new clinical assays, biomarkers, or cures. Rising to this urgent public health challenge demands an honest reckoning with the functional-neuroanatomical complexity of the amygdala and a shift from theories anchored on "the amygdala" to models centered on specific amygdala nuclei and cell types. This review begins by examining evidence from studies of rodents, monkeys, and humans for the "canonical model," the idea that the amygdala plays a central role in fear- and anxiety-related states, traits, and disorders. Next, the authors selectively highlight work indicating that the canonical model, while true, is overly simplistic and fails to adequately capture the actual state of the evidentiary record, the breadth of amygdala-associated functions and illnesses, or the complexity of the amygdala's functional architecture. The authors describe the implications of these facts for basic and clinical neuroimaging research. The review concludes with some general recommendations for grappling with the complexity of the amygdala and accelerating efforts to understand and more effectively treat amygdala-related psychopathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信