整合虚拟现实技术,在前所未有的时代加强解剖学远程教学。

IF 1.4 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Thomas Boillat, Ivan James Prithishkumar, Dineshwary Suresh, Nerissa Naidoo
{"title":"整合虚拟现实技术,在前所未有的时代加强解剖学远程教学。","authors":"Thomas Boillat, Ivan James Prithishkumar, Dineshwary Suresh, Nerissa Naidoo","doi":"10.5115/acb.24.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a global paradigm shift in the teaching of human anatomy. Most institutions successfully transitioned from traditional in-person teaching methods, to various distance-learning strategies. Since virtual reality (VR) offers immersive three-dimensional (3D) experiences, this study investigated students' experiences regarding the capacity of VR to support distance-learning of anatomy. Using the VR application, 3D Organon Virtual Reality Anatomy, anatomy instructors pre-recorded learning content as 360-degree videos with live voice-over and integrated it into the teaching material of the MBBS first-year abdomen, pelvis, and perineum-structure and function course. A 19-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, comprising of two major categories, \"VR experience in anatomy lessons\" and \"VR in anatomy lessons vs. traditional cadaveric dissection\" was disseminated. Post-evaluation analysis revealed a response rate of 63.5%. Almost 70% of students agreed that VR was instrumental in solidifying their theoretical understanding and improved spatial awareness with better retention of anatomical relationships. Approximately 50% wanted to continue using VR even if instruction becomes onsite. Though 72% of participants agree that VR addressed the session learning objectives only 24% agree that it is similar or better than cadaveric dissection, thus preferring cadaveric dissection to VR. Only 12.1% agree that VR is more beneficial to cadaveric dissection. Our exploration into the integration of VR technology in anatomy teaching has revealed promising opportunities. While VR can augment traditional teaching methods in unprecedented times such as war, floods or global pandemic, it should not replace hands-on cadaveric learning entirely, but rather complement existing approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":7831,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating virtual reality to enhance remote teaching of anatomy during unprecedented times.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Boillat, Ivan James Prithishkumar, Dineshwary Suresh, Nerissa Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.5115/acb.24.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a global paradigm shift in the teaching of human anatomy. Most institutions successfully transitioned from traditional in-person teaching methods, to various distance-learning strategies. Since virtual reality (VR) offers immersive three-dimensional (3D) experiences, this study investigated students' experiences regarding the capacity of VR to support distance-learning of anatomy. Using the VR application, 3D Organon Virtual Reality Anatomy, anatomy instructors pre-recorded learning content as 360-degree videos with live voice-over and integrated it into the teaching material of the MBBS first-year abdomen, pelvis, and perineum-structure and function course. A 19-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, comprising of two major categories, \\\"VR experience in anatomy lessons\\\" and \\\"VR in anatomy lessons vs. traditional cadaveric dissection\\\" was disseminated. Post-evaluation analysis revealed a response rate of 63.5%. Almost 70% of students agreed that VR was instrumental in solidifying their theoretical understanding and improved spatial awareness with better retention of anatomical relationships. Approximately 50% wanted to continue using VR even if instruction becomes onsite. Though 72% of participants agree that VR addressed the session learning objectives only 24% agree that it is similar or better than cadaveric dissection, thus preferring cadaveric dissection to VR. Only 12.1% agree that VR is more beneficial to cadaveric dissection. Our exploration into the integration of VR technology in anatomy teaching has revealed promising opportunities. While VR can augment traditional teaching methods in unprecedented times such as war, floods or global pandemic, it should not replace hands-on cadaveric learning entirely, but rather complement existing approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomy & Cell Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomy & Cell Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.24.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.24.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行迫使全球人体解剖学教学模式发生转变。大多数机构成功地从传统的面对面教学方法过渡到各种远程学习策略。由于虚拟现实(VR)提供身临其境的三维(3D)体验,本研究调查了学生对VR支持解剖学远程学习能力的体验。使用3D Organon虚拟现实解剖学VR应用程序,解剖学讲师将学习内容预先录制为360度视频,并带有现场画外音,并将其整合到MBBS一年级腹部,骨盆和会阴结构与功能课程的教材中。问卷共19项,分为“解剖课上的VR体验”和“解剖课上的VR与传统尸体解剖”两大类。评价后分析显示有效率为63.5%。近70%的学生认为VR有助于巩固他们的理论理解,提高空间意识,更好地保留解剖关系。大约50%的人想继续使用VR,即使教学变成现场。尽管72%的参与者同意虚拟现实解决了会议学习目标,但只有24%的人同意它与尸体解剖相似或更好,因此更喜欢尸体解剖而不是虚拟现实。只有12.1%的人认为VR更有利于尸体解剖。我们对VR技术在解剖学教学中的应用进行了探索,发现了很好的机会。虽然VR可以在战争、洪水或全球流行病等前所未有的时期增强传统的教学方法,但它不应该完全取代动手学习尸体,而是补充现有的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating virtual reality to enhance remote teaching of anatomy during unprecedented times.

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a global paradigm shift in the teaching of human anatomy. Most institutions successfully transitioned from traditional in-person teaching methods, to various distance-learning strategies. Since virtual reality (VR) offers immersive three-dimensional (3D) experiences, this study investigated students' experiences regarding the capacity of VR to support distance-learning of anatomy. Using the VR application, 3D Organon Virtual Reality Anatomy, anatomy instructors pre-recorded learning content as 360-degree videos with live voice-over and integrated it into the teaching material of the MBBS first-year abdomen, pelvis, and perineum-structure and function course. A 19-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, comprising of two major categories, "VR experience in anatomy lessons" and "VR in anatomy lessons vs. traditional cadaveric dissection" was disseminated. Post-evaluation analysis revealed a response rate of 63.5%. Almost 70% of students agreed that VR was instrumental in solidifying their theoretical understanding and improved spatial awareness with better retention of anatomical relationships. Approximately 50% wanted to continue using VR even if instruction becomes onsite. Though 72% of participants agree that VR addressed the session learning objectives only 24% agree that it is similar or better than cadaveric dissection, thus preferring cadaveric dissection to VR. Only 12.1% agree that VR is more beneficial to cadaveric dissection. Our exploration into the integration of VR technology in anatomy teaching has revealed promising opportunities. While VR can augment traditional teaching methods in unprecedented times such as war, floods or global pandemic, it should not replace hands-on cadaveric learning entirely, but rather complement existing approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomy & Cell Biology
Anatomy & Cell Biology ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信