Avallone Emilio , Pietro De Luca , Timm Max , Siani Agnese , Viola Pasquale , Ralli Massimo , Chiarella Giuseppe , Ricciardiello Filippo , Salzano Francesco Antonio , Scarpa Alfonso
{"title":"人工智能在CT图像上诊断胆脂瘤的可靠性如何?","authors":"Avallone Emilio , Pietro De Luca , Timm Max , Siani Agnese , Viola Pasquale , Ralli Massimo , Chiarella Giuseppe , Ricciardiello Filippo , Salzano Francesco Antonio , Scarpa Alfonso","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 1","pages":"Article 104519"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How reliable is artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on CT images?\",\"authors\":\"Avallone Emilio , Pietro De Luca , Timm Max , Siani Agnese , Viola Pasquale , Ralli Massimo , Chiarella Giuseppe , Ricciardiello Filippo , Salzano Francesco Antonio , Scarpa Alfonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 104519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924003053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How reliable is artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on CT images?
Purpose
This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies.
Methods
A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
Results
The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures.
Conclusions
AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.
期刊介绍:
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.