乳腺癌患者及其配偶疾病感知、二元应对和疾病管理的关系:一个二元纵向中介模型

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mingfang Li, Lijuan Zhang, Liping Zhang, Xinyi Li, Yantong Xie, Yuqi Qiu, Meng Zhao, Jing Chen, Jun Yan
{"title":"乳腺癌患者及其配偶疾病感知、二元应对和疾病管理的关系:一个二元纵向中介模型","authors":"Mingfang Li,&nbsp;Lijuan Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Yantong Xie,&nbsp;Yuqi Qiu,&nbsp;Meng Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Jun Yan","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe and compare dyads' illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management among breast cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, we explore the direct actor and partner effects of illness perception on illness management, and whether this association is mediated by dyadic coping.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A descriptive and longitudinal study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline illness perceptions and dyadic coping during hospitalization were measured by using the Illness Perception Questionnaire–revised (IPQ-R) and the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). At the 3rd month after discharge, the Cancer Self-Management Assessment Scale (CSMAS) and the Caregiver's Contribution to the Cancer Patient's Self-Management Scale (CC-CPSMS) were used to test the dyads' illness management. Then, the actor–partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was constructed to explore intrapersonal and interpersonal effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 225 postsurgical breast cancer patients and their spouses completed the questionnaires. It revealed that patients' or spouses' illness perceptions had both positive and negative direct actor effects on their own illness management (positive: personal control and illness coherence dimension; and negative: timeline acute/chronic, consequence, emotional representation and causes-uncontrollable factors dimension). The significant direct partner effects were only displayed in the timeline acute/chronic dimension. Moreover, dyadic coping had mediating effects on these paths, and only the actor–actor and partner–actor indirect effects were statistically significant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the significance of illness perceptions in influencing dyads' illness management and reveals the underlying mediating mechanism of dyadic coping. It can provide more specific guidance for dyadic interventions to optimize dyads' behaviour among breast cancer patients and their spouses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationships among illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management in breast cancer patients and their spouses: A dyadic longitudinal mediation model\",\"authors\":\"Mingfang Li,&nbsp;Lijuan Zhang,&nbsp;Liping Zhang,&nbsp;Xinyi Li,&nbsp;Yantong Xie,&nbsp;Yuqi Qiu,&nbsp;Meng Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Chen,&nbsp;Jun Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To describe and compare dyads' illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management among breast cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, we explore the direct actor and partner effects of illness perception on illness management, and whether this association is mediated by dyadic coping.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A descriptive and longitudinal study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline illness perceptions and dyadic coping during hospitalization were measured by using the Illness Perception Questionnaire–revised (IPQ-R) and the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). At the 3rd month after discharge, the Cancer Self-Management Assessment Scale (CSMAS) and the Caregiver's Contribution to the Cancer Patient's Self-Management Scale (CC-CPSMS) were used to test the dyads' illness management. Then, the actor–partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was constructed to explore intrapersonal and interpersonal effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 225 postsurgical breast cancer patients and their spouses completed the questionnaires. It revealed that patients' or spouses' illness perceptions had both positive and negative direct actor effects on their own illness management (positive: personal control and illness coherence dimension; and negative: timeline acute/chronic, consequence, emotional representation and causes-uncontrollable factors dimension). The significant direct partner effects were only displayed in the timeline acute/chronic dimension. Moreover, dyadic coping had mediating effects on these paths, and only the actor–actor and partner–actor indirect effects were statistically significant.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates the significance of illness perceptions in influencing dyads' illness management and reveals the underlying mediating mechanism of dyadic coping. It can provide more specific guidance for dyadic interventions to optimize dyads' behaviour among breast cancer patients and their spouses.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述和比较乳腺癌患者及其配偶对疾病的认知、应对和疾病管理。此外,我们还探讨了疾病感知对疾病管理的直接行为者和伙伴效应,以及这种关联是否通过二元应对介导。设计一项描述性和纵向研究。方法采用疾病知觉修正问卷(IPQ-R)和二元应对量表(DCI)对住院期间的基线疾病知觉和二元应对进行测量。出院后第3个月,采用《癌症自我管理评估量表》(CSMAS)和《护理者对癌症患者自我管理贡献量表》(CC-CPSMS)对两组患者的疾病管理情况进行测试。在此基础上,构建行为人-伴侣相互依赖中介模型(APIMeM),探讨行为人-伴侣相互依赖对个体和人际关系的影响。结果共225例乳腺癌术后患者及其配偶完成问卷调查。结果表明,患者或配偶的疾病感知对其自身疾病管理有积极和消极的直接行动者影响(积极:个人控制和疾病一致性维度;消极:时间轴急性/慢性、后果、情绪表征和原因-不可控因素维度)。显著的直接伴侣效应仅在时间轴急性/慢性维度上显示。此外,二元应对在这些路径中具有中介效应,只有行为人-行为人和伴侣-行为人的间接效应具有统计学意义。结论本研究证明了疾病感知对夫妻疾病管理的影响,揭示了夫妻应对的潜在中介机制。它可以为二元干预提供更具体的指导,以优化乳腺癌患者及其配偶的二元行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationships among illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management in breast cancer patients and their spouses: A dyadic longitudinal mediation model

Objectives

To describe and compare dyads' illness perceptions, dyadic coping and illness management among breast cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, we explore the direct actor and partner effects of illness perception on illness management, and whether this association is mediated by dyadic coping.

Design

A descriptive and longitudinal study.

Methods

Baseline illness perceptions and dyadic coping during hospitalization were measured by using the Illness Perception Questionnaire–revised (IPQ-R) and the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). At the 3rd month after discharge, the Cancer Self-Management Assessment Scale (CSMAS) and the Caregiver's Contribution to the Cancer Patient's Self-Management Scale (CC-CPSMS) were used to test the dyads' illness management. Then, the actor–partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was constructed to explore intrapersonal and interpersonal effects.

Results

A total of 225 postsurgical breast cancer patients and their spouses completed the questionnaires. It revealed that patients' or spouses' illness perceptions had both positive and negative direct actor effects on their own illness management (positive: personal control and illness coherence dimension; and negative: timeline acute/chronic, consequence, emotional representation and causes-uncontrollable factors dimension). The significant direct partner effects were only displayed in the timeline acute/chronic dimension. Moreover, dyadic coping had mediating effects on these paths, and only the actor–actor and partner–actor indirect effects were statistically significant.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the significance of illness perceptions in influencing dyads' illness management and reveals the underlying mediating mechanism of dyadic coping. It can provide more specific guidance for dyadic interventions to optimize dyads' behaviour among breast cancer patients and their spouses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信