城市化系统中的河道修复:利用生态流量目标和未来管理方案指导设计

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Anneliese Sytsma, Daniel Philippus, Jordyn M. Wolfand, Katie Irving, Kristine T. Taniguchi-Quan, Eric D. Stein, Terri S. Hogue
{"title":"城市化系统中的河道修复:利用生态流量目标和未来管理方案指导设计","authors":"Anneliese Sytsma,&nbsp;Daniel Philippus,&nbsp;Jordyn M. Wolfand,&nbsp;Katie Irving,&nbsp;Kristine T. Taniguchi-Quan,&nbsp;Eric D. Stein,&nbsp;Terri S. Hogue","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.13232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Restoration of urban rivers must simultaneously design for ecological habitat while accounting for altered flow regimes associated with urban runoff, flood protection, and industrial/wastewater discharge. The goal of this study was to use ecological flow targets to guide channel restoration of the Los Angeles (LA) River across potential future flow regimes. Using a one-dimensional hydraulic model, we simulated a range of channel cross section configurations subject to different flow management decisions (wastewater reuse, low-flow [LF] treatment, and baseflow augmentation). Hydraulic results were assessed relative to ecohydraulic targets for desirable aquatic species in the LA River (willow, steelhead trout, and Santa Ana sucker). Results suggest that, along the mainstem of the LA River, restoration designs that include narrow LF channels may support Santa Ana sucker habitat and steelhead migration if management decisions decrease instream flows (e.g., by reusing treated wastewater). However, the same channel design and management decisions may not provide conditions needed to propagate floodplain vegetation such as willows. In tributary reaches, flows are too low to support habitat conditions for Santa Ana sucker or steelhead but may be able to support riparian habitat if a soft-bottom LF channel and active floodplain are present. In general, results illustrate the trade-offs between water management goals and habitat requirements for target species.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"60 6","pages":"1175-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Channel restoration in urbanized systems: Guiding design using ecological flow targets and future management scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Anneliese Sytsma,&nbsp;Daniel Philippus,&nbsp;Jordyn M. Wolfand,&nbsp;Katie Irving,&nbsp;Kristine T. Taniguchi-Quan,&nbsp;Eric D. Stein,&nbsp;Terri S. Hogue\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1752-1688.13232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Restoration of urban rivers must simultaneously design for ecological habitat while accounting for altered flow regimes associated with urban runoff, flood protection, and industrial/wastewater discharge. The goal of this study was to use ecological flow targets to guide channel restoration of the Los Angeles (LA) River across potential future flow regimes. Using a one-dimensional hydraulic model, we simulated a range of channel cross section configurations subject to different flow management decisions (wastewater reuse, low-flow [LF] treatment, and baseflow augmentation). Hydraulic results were assessed relative to ecohydraulic targets for desirable aquatic species in the LA River (willow, steelhead trout, and Santa Ana sucker). Results suggest that, along the mainstem of the LA River, restoration designs that include narrow LF channels may support Santa Ana sucker habitat and steelhead migration if management decisions decrease instream flows (e.g., by reusing treated wastewater). However, the same channel design and management decisions may not provide conditions needed to propagate floodplain vegetation such as willows. In tributary reaches, flows are too low to support habitat conditions for Santa Ana sucker or steelhead but may be able to support riparian habitat if a soft-bottom LF channel and active floodplain are present. In general, results illustrate the trade-offs between water management goals and habitat requirements for target species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Water Resources Association\",\"volume\":\"60 6\",\"pages\":\"1175-1192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Water Resources Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.13232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.13232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市河流的恢复必须同时设计生态栖息地,同时考虑到与城市径流、防洪和工业/废水排放相关的水流状况的改变。本研究的目的是利用生态流量目标来指导洛杉矶河(LA)在潜在的未来流量状态下的河道恢复。利用一维水力模型,我们模拟了不同流量管理决策(废水回用、低流量[LF]处理和基流增加)下的一系列河道截面配置。水力结果评估相对生态水力目标的理想水生物种在洛杉矶河(柳,钢头鳟鱼,和圣安娜吸盘)。结果表明,如果管理决策减少了溪流流量(例如,通过再利用处理过的废水),那么沿着LA河的主干线,包括狭窄的LF通道的恢复设计可能会支持圣安娜吸盘栖息地和钢头迁移。然而,同样的河道设计和管理决策可能无法提供繁殖泛滥平原植被(如柳树)所需的条件。在支流中,流量太低,不足以支持圣安娜吸盘鱼或钢头鱼的栖息地条件,但如果存在软底LF通道和活跃的洪泛平原,则可能能够支持河岸栖息地。总的来说,结果说明了水管理目标和目标物种栖息地需求之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Channel restoration in urbanized systems: Guiding design using ecological flow targets and future management scenarios

Restoration of urban rivers must simultaneously design for ecological habitat while accounting for altered flow regimes associated with urban runoff, flood protection, and industrial/wastewater discharge. The goal of this study was to use ecological flow targets to guide channel restoration of the Los Angeles (LA) River across potential future flow regimes. Using a one-dimensional hydraulic model, we simulated a range of channel cross section configurations subject to different flow management decisions (wastewater reuse, low-flow [LF] treatment, and baseflow augmentation). Hydraulic results were assessed relative to ecohydraulic targets for desirable aquatic species in the LA River (willow, steelhead trout, and Santa Ana sucker). Results suggest that, along the mainstem of the LA River, restoration designs that include narrow LF channels may support Santa Ana sucker habitat and steelhead migration if management decisions decrease instream flows (e.g., by reusing treated wastewater). However, the same channel design and management decisions may not provide conditions needed to propagate floodplain vegetation such as willows. In tributary reaches, flows are too low to support habitat conditions for Santa Ana sucker or steelhead but may be able to support riparian habitat if a soft-bottom LF channel and active floodplain are present. In general, results illustrate the trade-offs between water management goals and habitat requirements for target species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信