增材制造金属晶格结构的弹道性能

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zhihao Xie , Xinqiang Fu , Qin Zhang , Lulu Liu , Xinying Zhu , Yi Ren , Wei Chen
{"title":"增材制造金属晶格结构的弹道性能","authors":"Zhihao Xie ,&nbsp;Xinqiang Fu ,&nbsp;Qin Zhang ,&nbsp;Lulu Liu ,&nbsp;Xinying Zhu ,&nbsp;Yi Ren ,&nbsp;Wei Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tws.2024.112763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For the purpose of elucidating the destruction and energy absorption mechanisms of lattice structures during ballistic impacts, this study explored the behavior of two additively manufactured metal lattice structures (BCC and BCCZ) under quasi-static/dynamic compression and ballistic impact through experiments and numerical simulations. Both structures exhibited typical stress-strain behaviors during quasi-static compression, with stress plateauing after reaching yield strength and then sharply declining upon failure. The vertical struts in the BCCZ structure resulted in higher yield strength but lower normalized failure strain compared to the BCC structure, especially at higher strain rates. The ballistic limit of the BCC lattice sandwich target plate at 199 m/s and that of the BCCZ lattice sandwich target plate at 195 m/s. At an impact velocity of 207 m/s, the energy absorbed by the BCC lattice structure itself (498 J) was marginally lower than that absorbed by the BCCZ structure (505 J). The BCC structure, characterized by lower stiffness and yield strength but a larger failure strain, absorbed energy primarily through greater deformation during impact. In contrast, the BCCZ structure, with a smaller failure strain, depended on its higher stiffness and yield strength for energy absorption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49435,"journal":{"name":"Thin-Walled Structures","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 112763"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ballistic performance of additive manufacturing metal lattice structures\",\"authors\":\"Zhihao Xie ,&nbsp;Xinqiang Fu ,&nbsp;Qin Zhang ,&nbsp;Lulu Liu ,&nbsp;Xinying Zhu ,&nbsp;Yi Ren ,&nbsp;Wei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tws.2024.112763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>For the purpose of elucidating the destruction and energy absorption mechanisms of lattice structures during ballistic impacts, this study explored the behavior of two additively manufactured metal lattice structures (BCC and BCCZ) under quasi-static/dynamic compression and ballistic impact through experiments and numerical simulations. Both structures exhibited typical stress-strain behaviors during quasi-static compression, with stress plateauing after reaching yield strength and then sharply declining upon failure. The vertical struts in the BCCZ structure resulted in higher yield strength but lower normalized failure strain compared to the BCC structure, especially at higher strain rates. The ballistic limit of the BCC lattice sandwich target plate at 199 m/s and that of the BCCZ lattice sandwich target plate at 195 m/s. At an impact velocity of 207 m/s, the energy absorbed by the BCC lattice structure itself (498 J) was marginally lower than that absorbed by the BCCZ structure (505 J). The BCC structure, characterized by lower stiffness and yield strength but a larger failure strain, absorbed energy primarily through greater deformation during impact. In contrast, the BCCZ structure, with a smaller failure strain, depended on its higher stiffness and yield strength for energy absorption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thin-Walled Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823124012035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thin-Walled Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823124012035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了阐明点阵结构在弹道冲击中的破坏和能量吸收机理,本研究通过实验和数值模拟研究了两种增材制造金属点阵结构(BCC和BCCZ)在准静态/动态压缩和弹道冲击下的行为。两种结构在准静态压缩过程中均表现出典型的应力-应变行为,在达到屈服强度后应力趋于稳定,破坏后应力急剧下降。与BCC结构相比,BCCZ结构中的垂直支板具有更高的屈服强度和更低的归一化破坏应变,特别是在高应变率下。BCC晶格夹层靶板的弹道极限为199 m/s, BCCZ晶格夹层靶板的弹道极限为195 m/s。在207 m/s的冲击速度下,BCC晶格结构自身吸收的能量(498 J)略低于BCCZ结构吸收的能量(505 J), BCC结构刚度和屈服强度较低,但破坏应变较大,主要通过较大的冲击变形吸收能量。相比之下,BCCZ结构具有较小的破坏应变,依赖于其较高的刚度和屈服强度来吸收能量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ballistic performance of additive manufacturing metal lattice structures
For the purpose of elucidating the destruction and energy absorption mechanisms of lattice structures during ballistic impacts, this study explored the behavior of two additively manufactured metal lattice structures (BCC and BCCZ) under quasi-static/dynamic compression and ballistic impact through experiments and numerical simulations. Both structures exhibited typical stress-strain behaviors during quasi-static compression, with stress plateauing after reaching yield strength and then sharply declining upon failure. The vertical struts in the BCCZ structure resulted in higher yield strength but lower normalized failure strain compared to the BCC structure, especially at higher strain rates. The ballistic limit of the BCC lattice sandwich target plate at 199 m/s and that of the BCCZ lattice sandwich target plate at 195 m/s. At an impact velocity of 207 m/s, the energy absorbed by the BCC lattice structure itself (498 J) was marginally lower than that absorbed by the BCCZ structure (505 J). The BCC structure, characterized by lower stiffness and yield strength but a larger failure strain, absorbed energy primarily through greater deformation during impact. In contrast, the BCCZ structure, with a smaller failure strain, depended on its higher stiffness and yield strength for energy absorption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thin-Walled Structures
Thin-Walled Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
20.30%
发文量
801
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Thin-walled structures comprises an important and growing proportion of engineering construction with areas of application becoming increasingly diverse, ranging from aircraft, bridges, ships and oil rigs to storage vessels, industrial buildings and warehouses. Many factors, including cost and weight economy, new materials and processes and the growth of powerful methods of analysis have contributed to this growth, and led to the need for a journal which concentrates specifically on structures in which problems arise due to the thinness of the walls. This field includes cold– formed sections, plate and shell structures, reinforced plastics structures and aluminium structures, and is of importance in many branches of engineering. The primary criterion for consideration of papers in Thin–Walled Structures is that they must be concerned with thin–walled structures or the basic problems inherent in thin–walled structures. Provided this criterion is satisfied no restriction is placed on the type of construction, material or field of application. Papers on theory, experiment, design, etc., are published and it is expected that many papers will contain aspects of all three.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信