利用模拟未来极端天气事件来避免弹性陷阱:来自香港的实验证据

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
T. van Gevelt , J. Yang , K.N. Chan , L. Li , F. Williamson , B.G. McAdoo , A.D. Switzer
{"title":"利用模拟未来极端天气事件来避免弹性陷阱:来自香港的实验证据","authors":"T. van Gevelt ,&nbsp;J. Yang ,&nbsp;K.N. Chan ,&nbsp;L. Li ,&nbsp;F. Williamson ,&nbsp;B.G. McAdoo ,&nbsp;A.D. Switzer","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hong Kong is a hyper-dense coastal city that has long learned to live with a potentially disastrous extreme weather event: tropical cyclones. This was largely a reactionary process, with investments in soft and hard infrastructure made in the aftermath of devastating tropical cyclones. While the experiences of devastating tropical cyclones remain strong in the collective memory of the city, Hong Kong's present-day resilience has led to complacency, especially among the general public. We suggest that Hong Kong may be caught in a resilience trap, where previous success in building resilience may be hindering the city's ability to adapt to the impacts of future tropical cyclones. We use downward counterfactual modelling and an experimental framework to test whether simulating and visualizing the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can substitute for first-hand experience and allow individuals to experientially process the expected future impacts of tropical cyclones. Using experimental data collected from a representative sample of the general population (<em>n</em> = <em>1240</em>), we find that simulating the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can partially substitute for first-hand experience, increase risk perceptions, and help Hong Kong escape the resilience trap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 105020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using simulations of future extreme weather events to escape the resilience trap: Experimental evidence from Hong Kong\",\"authors\":\"T. van Gevelt ,&nbsp;J. Yang ,&nbsp;K.N. Chan ,&nbsp;L. Li ,&nbsp;F. Williamson ,&nbsp;B.G. McAdoo ,&nbsp;A.D. Switzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hong Kong is a hyper-dense coastal city that has long learned to live with a potentially disastrous extreme weather event: tropical cyclones. This was largely a reactionary process, with investments in soft and hard infrastructure made in the aftermath of devastating tropical cyclones. While the experiences of devastating tropical cyclones remain strong in the collective memory of the city, Hong Kong's present-day resilience has led to complacency, especially among the general public. We suggest that Hong Kong may be caught in a resilience trap, where previous success in building resilience may be hindering the city's ability to adapt to the impacts of future tropical cyclones. We use downward counterfactual modelling and an experimental framework to test whether simulating and visualizing the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can substitute for first-hand experience and allow individuals to experientially process the expected future impacts of tropical cyclones. Using experimental data collected from a representative sample of the general population (<em>n</em> = <em>1240</em>), we find that simulating the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can partially substitute for first-hand experience, increase risk perceptions, and help Hong Kong escape the resilience trap.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007829\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924007829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

香港是一个人口密度极高的沿海城市,长期以来一直学会应对潜在的灾难性极端天气事件:热带气旋。这在很大程度上是一个反动的过程,在毁灭性的热带气旋过后,对软硬基础设施进行了投资。虽然毁灭性的热带气旋在香港人的集体记忆中留下了深刻的印象,但香港目前的恢复能力却让人自满,尤其是在公众中。我们认为,香港可能陷入弹性陷阱,以往在建立弹性方面的成功,可能会阻碍香港适应未来热带气旋影响的能力。我们使用向下反事实模型和实验框架来测试模拟和可视化未来热带气旋的影响是否可以代替第一手经验,并允许个人经验处理热带气旋的预期未来影响。利用从一般人群中收集的代表性样本(n = 1240)的实验数据,我们发现模拟未来热带气旋的影响可以部分替代第一手经验,增加风险认知,并帮助香港摆脱弹性陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using simulations of future extreme weather events to escape the resilience trap: Experimental evidence from Hong Kong
Hong Kong is a hyper-dense coastal city that has long learned to live with a potentially disastrous extreme weather event: tropical cyclones. This was largely a reactionary process, with investments in soft and hard infrastructure made in the aftermath of devastating tropical cyclones. While the experiences of devastating tropical cyclones remain strong in the collective memory of the city, Hong Kong's present-day resilience has led to complacency, especially among the general public. We suggest that Hong Kong may be caught in a resilience trap, where previous success in building resilience may be hindering the city's ability to adapt to the impacts of future tropical cyclones. We use downward counterfactual modelling and an experimental framework to test whether simulating and visualizing the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can substitute for first-hand experience and allow individuals to experientially process the expected future impacts of tropical cyclones. Using experimental data collected from a representative sample of the general population (n = 1240), we find that simulating the impacts of a future tropical cyclone can partially substitute for first-hand experience, increase risk perceptions, and help Hong Kong escape the resilience trap.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信