J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta
{"title":"在非心脏大手术前6分钟步行试验中测量的预测厌氧能力的估计主动脉脉冲波速度的有效性","authors":"J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta","doi":"10.1016/j.redar.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6<!--> <!-->min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥<!--> <!-->0.75) for predicting a distance of <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, ≥<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, and also 563<!--> <!-->m in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve analysis for the <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for ><!--> <!-->563<!--> <!-->m. Patients with AoPWV ><!--> <!-->10.97<!--> <!-->m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with <<!--> <!-->9.42<!--> <!-->m/s can be considered low risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","volume":"71 10","pages":"Pages 710-718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca\",\"authors\":\"J. Ripollés-Melchor , M.I. Monge García , A. Ruiz-Escobar , E. Sáez-Ruiz , B. Algar-Yañez , A. Abad-Motos , A. Abad-Gurumeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.redar.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6<!--> <!-->min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥<!--> <!-->0.75) for predicting a distance of <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, ≥<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m, and also 563<!--> <!-->m in the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ROC curve analysis for the <<!--> <!-->427<!--> <!-->m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for ><!--> <!-->563<!--> <!-->m. Patients with AoPWV ><!--> <!-->10.97<!--> <!-->m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with <<!--> <!-->9.42<!--> <!-->m/s can be considered low risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"volume\":\"71 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 710-718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624000999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034935624000999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validez de la velocidad estimada de onda de pulso aórtica medida durante la prueba de caminata de 6 minutos para predecir la capacidad anaeróbica antes de la cirugía mayor no cardiaca
Background
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of estimated preoperative aortic pulse wave velocity (AoPWV) to discriminate between low and high 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance in patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery.
Methods
Prospective observational study in 133 patients ungergoing non cardiac surgery. AoPWV and the distance walked during a 6MWT were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine two different AoPWV cut-points for predicting a distance of 427 m in the 6MWT. We also calculated lower and upper AoPWV cut-points (probability ≥ 0.75) for predicting a distance of < 427 m, ≥ 427 m, and also 563 m in the 6MWT.
Results
The ROC curve analysis for the < 427 m distance revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.56–-0.79) and an AUC of 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.83) for > 563 m. Patients with AoPWV > 10.97 m/s should be considered higher risk, while those with < 9.42 m/s can be considered low risk.
Conclusions
AoPWV is a simple, non-invasive, useful clinical tool for identifying and stratifying patients awaiting major non-cardiac surgery. In situations of clinical uncertainty, additional measures should be taken to assess the risk.