你相信什么就会得到什么?对非临床样本中关于睡眠的信念和态度如何与睡眠时间相关的系统回顾

IF 11.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spencer A. Nielson , Julia T. Boyle , Natalie D. Dautovich , Joseph M. Dzierzewski
{"title":"你相信什么就会得到什么?对非临床样本中关于睡眠的信念和态度如何与睡眠时间相关的系统回顾","authors":"Spencer A. Nielson ,&nbsp;Julia T. Boyle ,&nbsp;Natalie D. Dautovich ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Dzierzewski","doi":"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A burgeoning area of research is investigating whether beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in individuals without clinical conditions (e.g., insomnia, depression, anxiety, chronic pain). This review sought to examine and synthesize the extant research in non-clinical samples. A systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines was conducted between March 2024 and May 2024, with 2204 studies screened. Study quality was assessed using NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies. Seventeen articles met eligibility criteria. All studies were classified as “fair” or “poor” quality. Studies generally demonstrated that more favorable attitudes and beliefs were associated with appropriate sleep duration. Specific beliefs related to sleep may be differentially associated with sleep duration. Preliminary evidence demonstrated that demographic factors may modify this association. Favorable attitudes toward sleep may be associated with more appropriate sleep duration among individuals without clinical conditions. However, the quality of the extant research was rated poorly, demonstrating a need for additional, higher quality studies. Future studies should consider this relationship while considering demographic factors as this may have important implications for public sleep health efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49513,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102032"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What you believe is what you get? A systematic review examining how beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in non-clinical samples\",\"authors\":\"Spencer A. Nielson ,&nbsp;Julia T. Boyle ,&nbsp;Natalie D. Dautovich ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Dzierzewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A burgeoning area of research is investigating whether beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in individuals without clinical conditions (e.g., insomnia, depression, anxiety, chronic pain). This review sought to examine and synthesize the extant research in non-clinical samples. A systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines was conducted between March 2024 and May 2024, with 2204 studies screened. Study quality was assessed using NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies. Seventeen articles met eligibility criteria. All studies were classified as “fair” or “poor” quality. Studies generally demonstrated that more favorable attitudes and beliefs were associated with appropriate sleep duration. Specific beliefs related to sleep may be differentially associated with sleep duration. Preliminary evidence demonstrated that demographic factors may modify this association. Favorable attitudes toward sleep may be associated with more appropriate sleep duration among individuals without clinical conditions. However, the quality of the extant research was rated poorly, demonstrating a need for additional, higher quality studies. Future studies should consider this relationship while considering demographic factors as this may have important implications for public sleep health efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224001369\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1087079224001369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个新兴的研究领域是调查关于睡眠的信念和态度是否与没有临床症状(如失眠、抑郁、焦虑、慢性疼痛)的个体的睡眠时间有关。这篇综述试图检查和综合现有的非临床样本研究。在2024年3月至2024年5月期间,按照PRISMA指南对文献进行了系统回顾,筛选了2204项研究。研究质量采用美国国立卫生研究院队列和横断面研究质量评估工具和美国国立卫生研究院控制干预研究质量评估工具进行评估。17篇文章符合入选标准。所有的研究都被分为“一般”和“差”两类。研究普遍表明,更积极的态度和信念与适当的睡眠时间有关。与睡眠有关的特定信念可能与睡眠持续时间有不同的关联。初步证据表明,人口因素可能改变这种关联。在没有临床症状的个体中,良好的睡眠态度可能与更合适的睡眠时间有关。然而,现有研究的质量评价较差,表明需要进行额外的、更高质量的研究。未来的研究应该在考虑人口因素的同时考虑这种关系,因为这可能对公众睡眠健康的努力有重要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What you believe is what you get? A systematic review examining how beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in non-clinical samples
A burgeoning area of research is investigating whether beliefs and attitudes about sleep are associated with sleep duration in individuals without clinical conditions (e.g., insomnia, depression, anxiety, chronic pain). This review sought to examine and synthesize the extant research in non-clinical samples. A systematic review of the literature following PRISMA guidelines was conducted between March 2024 and May 2024, with 2204 studies screened. Study quality was assessed using NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies and NIH's Quality Assessment Tool for Controlled Intervention Studies. Seventeen articles met eligibility criteria. All studies were classified as “fair” or “poor” quality. Studies generally demonstrated that more favorable attitudes and beliefs were associated with appropriate sleep duration. Specific beliefs related to sleep may be differentially associated with sleep duration. Preliminary evidence demonstrated that demographic factors may modify this association. Favorable attitudes toward sleep may be associated with more appropriate sleep duration among individuals without clinical conditions. However, the quality of the extant research was rated poorly, demonstrating a need for additional, higher quality studies. Future studies should consider this relationship while considering demographic factors as this may have important implications for public sleep health efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Sleep Medicine Reviews 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine Reviews offers global coverage of sleep disorders, exploring their origins, diagnosis, treatment, and implications for related conditions at both individual and public health levels. Articles comprehensively review clinical information from peer-reviewed journals across various disciplines in sleep medicine, encompassing pulmonology, psychiatry, psychology, physiology, otolaryngology, pediatrics, geriatrics, cardiology, dentistry, nursing, neurology, and general medicine. The journal features narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and editorials addressing areas of controversy, debate, and future research within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信