政府官员绩效考核改革与企业环境投资:企业议价能力的调节作用

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Qiang Li , Zichun He , Wenjuan Ruan , Yulei Xia , Qingting Cai
{"title":"政府官员绩效考核改革与企业环境投资:企业议价能力的调节作用","authors":"Qiang Li ,&nbsp;Zichun He ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Ruan ,&nbsp;Yulei Xia ,&nbsp;Qingting Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing deterioration of the environment and growing global environmental awareness, there is a need to reform the performance evaluation of government officials from focusing solely on economic growth to incorporating environmental protection indicators. We use the pilot scheme of China's natural resource accountability audit (NRAA) as a natural experiment. Using data for 2010–2022 from Chinese listed companies in heavily polluting industries, we apply a difference-in-differences (DID) model to test the impact of the NRAA policy on corporate environmental investment (CEI) and further examine the moderating role of corporate bargaining power. The empirical results demonstrate that the level of CEI in pilot cities is significantly higher than that in non-pilot cities. However, if firms possess stronger bargaining power, the positive effect of the policy on CEI diminishes. Further analysis reveals that the influence of corporate bargaining power on the effectiveness of the policy can be constrained within the context of better internal and external governance. China's experience provides a viable approach for integrating environmental governance into a more comprehensive framework of performance evaluation systems for government officials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"85 ","pages":"Pages 150-168"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reformation of government officials’ performance evaluation and corporate environmental investment: The moderating effect of corporate bargaining power\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Li ,&nbsp;Zichun He ,&nbsp;Wenjuan Ruan ,&nbsp;Yulei Xia ,&nbsp;Qingting Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2024.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With increasing deterioration of the environment and growing global environmental awareness, there is a need to reform the performance evaluation of government officials from focusing solely on economic growth to incorporating environmental protection indicators. We use the pilot scheme of China's natural resource accountability audit (NRAA) as a natural experiment. Using data for 2010–2022 from Chinese listed companies in heavily polluting industries, we apply a difference-in-differences (DID) model to test the impact of the NRAA policy on corporate environmental investment (CEI) and further examine the moderating role of corporate bargaining power. The empirical results demonstrate that the level of CEI in pilot cities is significantly higher than that in non-pilot cities. However, if firms possess stronger bargaining power, the positive effect of the policy on CEI diminishes. Further analysis reveals that the influence of corporate bargaining power on the effectiveness of the policy can be constrained within the context of better internal and external governance. China's experience provides a viable approach for integrating environmental governance into a more comprehensive framework of performance evaluation systems for government officials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 150-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624003308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着环境的日益恶化和全球环保意识的增强,有必要对政府官员的政绩评价进行改革,从只注重经济增长到纳入环境保护指标。我们以中国自然资源问责审计(NRAA)试点作为自然实验。本文利用2010-2022年中国重污染行业上市公司的数据,运用差分中差分(DID)模型检验了NRAA政策对企业环境投资(CEI)的影响,并进一步检验了企业议价能力的调节作用。实证结果表明,试点城市CEI水平显著高于非试点城市。然而,当企业拥有较强的议价能力时,政策对企业竞争力的积极作用减弱。进一步分析表明,公司议价能力对政策有效性的影响可以在更好的内部和外部治理的背景下受到限制。中国的经验为将环境治理纳入更全面的政府官员绩效评估体系框架提供了可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reformation of government officials’ performance evaluation and corporate environmental investment: The moderating effect of corporate bargaining power
With increasing deterioration of the environment and growing global environmental awareness, there is a need to reform the performance evaluation of government officials from focusing solely on economic growth to incorporating environmental protection indicators. We use the pilot scheme of China's natural resource accountability audit (NRAA) as a natural experiment. Using data for 2010–2022 from Chinese listed companies in heavily polluting industries, we apply a difference-in-differences (DID) model to test the impact of the NRAA policy on corporate environmental investment (CEI) and further examine the moderating role of corporate bargaining power. The empirical results demonstrate that the level of CEI in pilot cities is significantly higher than that in non-pilot cities. However, if firms possess stronger bargaining power, the positive effect of the policy on CEI diminishes. Further analysis reveals that the influence of corporate bargaining power on the effectiveness of the policy can be constrained within the context of better internal and external governance. China's experience provides a viable approach for integrating environmental governance into a more comprehensive framework of performance evaluation systems for government officials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信