在初级保健环境中实施创伤后应激障碍的团体治疗:一项试点研究

Q3 Psychology
Kate Zona , Hsiang Huang , Margaret Spottswood
{"title":"在初级保健环境中实施创伤后应激障碍的团体治疗:一项试点研究","authors":"Kate Zona ,&nbsp;Hsiang Huang ,&nbsp;Margaret Spottswood","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with comorbid psychiatric and medical conditions and high rates of medical service utilization. Given that PTSD is highly prevalent in the primary care setting, group therapy delivered within this setting has the potential to treat large numbers of patients. To date, few studies have examined the feasibility or effectiveness of group therapy for PTSD within primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pilot study of a PTSD group therapy intervention based on the Trauma Information Group model was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Across 9 cohorts, 32 individuals with PTSD completed 8–10 group therapy sessions. Self-reported PTSD severity was assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at baseline and post-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty percent of participants had a PTSD treatment response (PCL-5 score reduction ≥10) following group therapy and paired <em>t</em>-tests demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PCL-5 scores from pre- to post-treatment. Patient demographic characteristics and psychiatric comorbities were not associated with treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The small sample size, demographic characteristics, and FQHC setting potentially limit the generalizability of these findings. Treatment dropout rates and associated factors also were not examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Trauma Information Group treatment for PTSD was feasible to implement within a low resourced primary care setting and led to improvement in PTSD symptoms in this pilot study. These findings suggest that offering group therapy for PTSD within primary care could improve access to effective treatment and warrant future research to examine feasibility and effectiveness in this setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100856"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Kate Zona ,&nbsp;Hsiang Huang ,&nbsp;Margaret Spottswood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with comorbid psychiatric and medical conditions and high rates of medical service utilization. Given that PTSD is highly prevalent in the primary care setting, group therapy delivered within this setting has the potential to treat large numbers of patients. To date, few studies have examined the feasibility or effectiveness of group therapy for PTSD within primary care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A pilot study of a PTSD group therapy intervention based on the Trauma Information Group model was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Across 9 cohorts, 32 individuals with PTSD completed 8–10 group therapy sessions. Self-reported PTSD severity was assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at baseline and post-treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty percent of participants had a PTSD treatment response (PCL-5 score reduction ≥10) following group therapy and paired <em>t</em>-tests demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PCL-5 scores from pre- to post-treatment. Patient demographic characteristics and psychiatric comorbities were not associated with treatment response.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>The small sample size, demographic characteristics, and FQHC setting potentially limit the generalizability of these findings. Treatment dropout rates and associated factors also were not examined.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Trauma Information Group treatment for PTSD was feasible to implement within a low resourced primary care setting and led to improvement in PTSD symptoms in this pilot study. These findings suggest that offering group therapy for PTSD within primary care could improve access to effective treatment and warrant future research to examine feasibility and effectiveness in this setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324001422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与精神疾病和医疗状况的共病以及医疗服务的高使用率有关。鉴于创伤后应激障碍在初级保健环境中非常普遍,在这种环境中提供的团体治疗有可能治疗大量患者。迄今为止,很少有研究检验在初级保健中对创伤后应激障碍进行团体治疗的可行性或有效性。方法采用创伤信息小组模型,在某联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)开展创伤后应激障碍群体治疗干预的初步研究。在9个队列中,32名PTSD患者完成了8-10次小组治疗。在基线和治疗后使用DSM-5 PTSD检查表(PCL-5)评估自我报告的PTSD严重程度。结果50%的参与者在小组治疗后有PTSD治疗反应(PCL-5评分降低≥10),配对t检验显示从治疗前到治疗后PCL-5评分有统计学意义的降低。患者人口学特征和精神合并症与治疗反应无关。局限性:小样本量、人口统计学特征和FQHC设置可能限制了这些发现的普遍性。治疗中途退出率和相关因素也没有被检查。结论创伤信息组治疗创伤后应激障碍在资源匮乏的初级保健环境中是可行的,并且在本试点研究中导致PTSD症状的改善。这些发现表明,在初级保健中提供创伤后应激障碍的团体治疗可以改善获得有效治疗的机会,并保证未来研究在这种情况下的可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder within a primary care setting: A pilot study

Background

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with comorbid psychiatric and medical conditions and high rates of medical service utilization. Given that PTSD is highly prevalent in the primary care setting, group therapy delivered within this setting has the potential to treat large numbers of patients. To date, few studies have examined the feasibility or effectiveness of group therapy for PTSD within primary care.

Methods

A pilot study of a PTSD group therapy intervention based on the Trauma Information Group model was conducted in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Across 9 cohorts, 32 individuals with PTSD completed 8–10 group therapy sessions. Self-reported PTSD severity was assessed using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at baseline and post-treatment.

Results

Fifty percent of participants had a PTSD treatment response (PCL-5 score reduction ≥10) following group therapy and paired t-tests demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in PCL-5 scores from pre- to post-treatment. Patient demographic characteristics and psychiatric comorbities were not associated with treatment response.

Limitations

The small sample size, demographic characteristics, and FQHC setting potentially limit the generalizability of these findings. Treatment dropout rates and associated factors also were not examined.

Conclusions

The Trauma Information Group treatment for PTSD was feasible to implement within a low resourced primary care setting and led to improvement in PTSD symptoms in this pilot study. These findings suggest that offering group therapy for PTSD within primary care could improve access to effective treatment and warrant future research to examine feasibility and effectiveness in this setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信