通过电话进行护士远程支持对2型糖尿病患者专科和初级护理过渡的影响:一项符合concont标准的随机临床试验

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Endocrine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-04095-6
Ana Marina Moreira, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Camila Bergonsi de Farias, Sabrina Coelli, Livia de Almeida Faller, Laura Ferraz Dos Santos, Ana Maria Matzenbacher, Natan Katz, Erno Harzeim, Sandra Pinho Silveiro
{"title":"通过电话进行护士远程支持对2型糖尿病患者专科和初级护理过渡的影响:一项符合concont标准的随机临床试验","authors":"Ana Marina Moreira, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Camila Bergonsi de Farias, Sabrina Coelli, Livia de Almeida Faller, Laura Ferraz Dos Santos, Ana Maria Matzenbacher, Natan Katz, Erno Harzeim, Sandra Pinho Silveiro","doi":"10.1007/s12020-024-04095-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of telemedicine in the transition to primary care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate this issue in well-controlled T2DM patients discharged from a tertiary clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a CONSORT-compliant 12-month randomized clinical trial (RCT). T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 8%, being discharged to primary care from a tertiary clinic, were recruited. The intervention group periodically received nurse phone calls focusing on education. The control group received primary care as usual. The main outcome was glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>147 patients were randomized (73 in intervention vs. 74 in control groups) with no differences in baseline data. After one year, we found no differences between groups in HbA1c (7.46% ± 1.37 in intervention vs. 7.54% ± 1.6 in control group; P = 0.76). HbA1c slightly increased from baseline in both groups (0.46% in intervention vs. 0.64% in control group) at 12 months, without differences between them (P = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A telemedicine intervention based on phone calls plus primary care shows a similar effect to primary care alone on T2DM patients' HbA1c after tertiary clinic discharge. Patients remained with a reasonable HbA1c during the trial, suggesting that the transition to primary care was safe.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials, NCT02768480. Registered on April 29, 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":49211,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine","volume":" ","pages":"978-986"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of nurse tele support via telephone calls on transition between specialized and primary care in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a CONSORT-compliant randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Marina Moreira, Dimitris Varvaki Rados, Camila Bergonsi de Farias, Sabrina Coelli, Livia de Almeida Faller, Laura Ferraz Dos Santos, Ana Maria Matzenbacher, Natan Katz, Erno Harzeim, Sandra Pinho Silveiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12020-024-04095-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of telemedicine in the transition to primary care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate this issue in well-controlled T2DM patients discharged from a tertiary clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a CONSORT-compliant 12-month randomized clinical trial (RCT). T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 8%, being discharged to primary care from a tertiary clinic, were recruited. The intervention group periodically received nurse phone calls focusing on education. The control group received primary care as usual. The main outcome was glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>147 patients were randomized (73 in intervention vs. 74 in control groups) with no differences in baseline data. After one year, we found no differences between groups in HbA1c (7.46% ± 1.37 in intervention vs. 7.54% ± 1.6 in control group; P = 0.76). HbA1c slightly increased from baseline in both groups (0.46% in intervention vs. 0.64% in control group) at 12 months, without differences between them (P = 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A telemedicine intervention based on phone calls plus primary care shows a similar effect to primary care alone on T2DM patients' HbA1c after tertiary clinic discharge. Patients remained with a reasonable HbA1c during the trial, suggesting that the transition to primary care was safe.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical Trials, NCT02768480. Registered on April 29, 2016.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"978-986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04095-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04095-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程医疗在2型糖尿病(T2DM)向初级保健过渡中的作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是在从三级诊所出院的控制良好的2型糖尿病患者中评估这一问题。方法:这是一项符合const标准的12个月随机临床试验(RCT)。结果:147例患者被随机分组(干预组73例,对照组74例),基线数据无差异。一年后,我们发现两组间HbA1c无差异(干预组为7.46%±1.37,对照组为7.54%±1.6;p = 0.76)。12个月时,两组的HbA1c均较基线略有升高(干预组为0.46%,对照组为0.64%),两组间无差异(P = 0.69)。结论:基于电话和初级保健的远程医疗干预对T2DM患者三级临床出院后的HbA1c的影响与单独的初级保健相似。在试验期间,患者的HbA1c保持在合理水平,这表明向初级保健的过渡是安全的。试验注册:临床试验,NCT02768480。2016年4月29日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of nurse tele support via telephone calls on transition between specialized and primary care in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a CONSORT-compliant randomized clinical trial.

Background: The role of telemedicine in the transition to primary care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is yet unknown. We aimed to evaluate this issue in well-controlled T2DM patients discharged from a tertiary clinic.

Methods: This is a CONSORT-compliant 12-month randomized clinical trial (RCT). T2DM patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 8%, being discharged to primary care from a tertiary clinic, were recruited. The intervention group periodically received nurse phone calls focusing on education. The control group received primary care as usual. The main outcome was glycemic control (HbA1c) at 12 months.

Results: 147 patients were randomized (73 in intervention vs. 74 in control groups) with no differences in baseline data. After one year, we found no differences between groups in HbA1c (7.46% ± 1.37 in intervention vs. 7.54% ± 1.6 in control group; P = 0.76). HbA1c slightly increased from baseline in both groups (0.46% in intervention vs. 0.64% in control group) at 12 months, without differences between them (P = 0.69).

Conclusions: A telemedicine intervention based on phone calls plus primary care shows a similar effect to primary care alone on T2DM patients' HbA1c after tertiary clinic discharge. Patients remained with a reasonable HbA1c during the trial, suggesting that the transition to primary care was safe.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT02768480. Registered on April 29, 2016.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine
Endocrine ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Well-established as a major journal in today’s rapidly advancing experimental and clinical research areas, Endocrine publishes original articles devoted to basic (including molecular, cellular and physiological studies), translational and clinical research in all the different fields of endocrinology and metabolism. Articles will be accepted based on peer-reviews, priority, and editorial decision. Invited reviews, mini-reviews and viewpoints on relevant pathophysiological and clinical topics, as well as Editorials on articles appearing in the Journal, are published. Unsolicited Editorials will be evaluated by the editorial team. Outcomes of scientific meetings, as well as guidelines and position statements, may be submitted. The Journal also considers special feature articles in the field of endocrine genetics and epigenetics, as well as articles devoted to novel methods and techniques in endocrinology. Endocrine covers controversial, clinical endocrine issues. Meta-analyses on endocrine and metabolic topics are also accepted. Descriptions of single clinical cases and/or small patients studies are not published unless of exceptional interest. However, reports of novel imaging studies and endocrine side effects in single patients may be considered. Research letters and letters to the editor related or unrelated to recently published articles can be submitted. Endocrine covers leading topics in endocrinology such as neuroendocrinology, pituitary and hypothalamic peptides, thyroid physiological and clinical aspects, bone and mineral metabolism and osteoporosis, obesity, lipid and energy metabolism and food intake control, insulin, Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, hormones of male and female reproduction, adrenal diseases pediatric and geriatric endocrinology, endocrine hypertension and endocrine oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信