在所有心导管插入术前进行常规检查:是时候重新考虑了?

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sammy Arab MBBS, BSc , Karan Josan BMedSci , Jude Merzah MBBChBAO , Issam Motairek MD , Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS
{"title":"在所有心导管插入术前进行常规检查:是时候重新考虑了?","authors":"Sammy Arab MBBS, BSc ,&nbsp;Karan Josan BMedSci ,&nbsp;Jude Merzah MBBChBAO ,&nbsp;Issam Motairek MD ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Nil per os</em> (NPO) is a common instruction before cardiac catheterisation. NPO was originally adopted from general surgery to minimise gastric contents during procedures and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration in case of vomiting. However, NPO has since been associated with adverse effects on patient well-being, fasting-related complications, and increased health care costs. These burdens are multiplied by the large number of cardiac catheterisations performed. Advances in anaesthesia and contrast agents may have rendered preprocedural fasting obsolete. Here, we examine the evidence for and against routine NPO practices and consider the possible value of a more targeted approach. Current evidence strongly suggests that not fasting before cardiac catheterisation does not significantly increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration or other complications. Therefore, while further large-scale trials are on-going to confirm the safety of nonfasting, hospitals should begin to reduce fasting periods whenever possible. New guidelines should stratify patients by their risk of aspiration, reserving NPO only for those at high risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 256-263"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Routine Nil Per Os Before All Cardiac Catheterisations: Time to Reconsider?\",\"authors\":\"Sammy Arab MBBS, BSc ,&nbsp;Karan Josan BMedSci ,&nbsp;Jude Merzah MBBChBAO ,&nbsp;Issam Motairek MD ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Goldsweig MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjca.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Nil per os</em> (NPO) is a common instruction before cardiac catheterisation. NPO was originally adopted from general surgery to minimise gastric contents during procedures and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration in case of vomiting. However, NPO has since been associated with adverse effects on patient well-being, fasting-related complications, and increased health care costs. These burdens are multiplied by the large number of cardiac catheterisations performed. Advances in anaesthesia and contrast agents may have rendered preprocedural fasting obsolete. Here, we examine the evidence for and against routine NPO practices and consider the possible value of a more targeted approach. Current evidence strongly suggests that not fasting before cardiac catheterisation does not significantly increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration or other complications. Therefore, while further large-scale trials are on-going to confirm the safety of nonfasting, hospitals should begin to reduce fasting periods whenever possible. New guidelines should stratify patients by their risk of aspiration, reserving NPO only for those at high risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 256-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X24012224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X24012224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无氧(NPO)是心导管插入术前的常见指示。NPO最初是从普通外科采用的,目的是在手术过程中尽量减少胃内容物,并降低呕吐时肺部误吸的风险。然而,NPO与患者健康的不良影响、与禁食相关的并发症以及医疗费用的增加有关。这些负担由于大量的心导管插入术而成倍增加。麻醉和造影剂的进步可能使手术前禁食过时。在这里,我们研究了支持和反对常规NPO实践的证据,并考虑了更有针对性的方法的可能价值。目前的证据强烈表明,心导管插入术前不禁食不会显著增加肺误吸或其他并发症的风险。因此,虽然进一步的大规模试验正在进行中,以确认非禁食的安全性,但医院应开始尽可能减少禁食时间。新的指南应根据患者的误吸风险对患者进行分层,仅为高危患者保留NPO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Routine Nil Per Os Before All Cardiac Catheterisations: Time to Reconsider?
Nil per os (NPO) is a common instruction before cardiac catheterisation. NPO was originally adopted from general surgery to minimise gastric contents during procedures and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration in case of vomiting. However, NPO has since been associated with adverse effects on patient well-being, fasting-related complications, and increased health care costs. These burdens are multiplied by the large number of cardiac catheterisations performed. Advances in anaesthesia and contrast agents may have rendered preprocedural fasting obsolete. Here, we examine the evidence for and against routine NPO practices and consider the possible value of a more targeted approach. Current evidence strongly suggests that not fasting before cardiac catheterisation does not significantly increase the risk of pulmonary aspiration or other complications. Therefore, while further large-scale trials are on-going to confirm the safety of nonfasting, hospitals should begin to reduce fasting periods whenever possible. New guidelines should stratify patients by their risk of aspiration, reserving NPO only for those at high risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
8.10%
发文量
546
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信