经阴道自然孔内窥镜手术子宫切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xian Wu, Xin Li, Aijie Xie, Jia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Yunyi Su, Ying Liu, Wei Cheng, Ying Jin, Lulu Wang, Yujian Jia, Jianmei Liao, Hui Wang, Xia Yu, Ling Zhang, Yalan Li, Li He, Yonghong Lin, Xiaoqin Gan
{"title":"经阴道自然孔内窥镜手术子宫切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Xian Wu, Xin Li, Aijie Xie, Jia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Yunyi Su, Ying Liu, Wei Cheng, Ying Jin, Lulu Wang, Yujian Jia, Jianmei Liao, Hui Wang, Xia Yu, Ling Zhang, Yalan Li, Li He, Yonghong Lin, Xiaoqin Gan","doi":"10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is widely recognized for its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain and the absence of visible scarring. However, the anatomical specificity required for vNOTES may increase the risk of injury to nearby organs, such as the rectum and bladder. This study aims to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of vNOTES compared to transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for Hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), conducted in Chengdu, China, included 192 patients who underwent hysterectomy between May and October 2023. This study prospectively collected and compared perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter surgery times, postoperative flatus time, and hospital stays, but it also had a higher conversion rate. Specifically, the vNOTES approach reduced surgery duration by approximately 29.8 min (95% CI: -41.31, -18.34, P < 0.001) but increased intraoperative blood loss by about 41.82 mL (95% CI: 25.81, 57.82, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By combining laparoscopy with traditional vaginal surgery, vNOTES offers advantages such as shorter surgery times, faster postoperative recovery, reduced hospital stays, greater minimal invasiveness, and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, it is essential for surgeons to continually enhance and standardize preoperative assessments and surgical techniques to minimize conversion rates and reduce intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Trial registry number: </strong>ChiCTR2200059282, China Clinical Trials Registry, April 28, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Xian Wu, Xin Li, Aijie Xie, Jia Liu, Tianjiao Liu, Yunyi Su, Ying Liu, Wei Cheng, Ying Jin, Lulu Wang, Yujian Jia, Jianmei Liao, Hui Wang, Xia Yu, Ling Zhang, Yalan Li, Li He, Yonghong Lin, Xiaoqin Gan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is widely recognized for its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain and the absence of visible scarring. However, the anatomical specificity required for vNOTES may increase the risk of injury to nearby organs, such as the rectum and bladder. This study aims to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of vNOTES compared to transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for Hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), conducted in Chengdu, China, included 192 patients who underwent hysterectomy between May and October 2023. This study prospectively collected and compared perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter surgery times, postoperative flatus time, and hospital stays, but it also had a higher conversion rate. Specifically, the vNOTES approach reduced surgery duration by approximately 29.8 min (95% CI: -41.31, -18.34, P < 0.001) but increased intraoperative blood loss by about 41.82 mL (95% CI: 25.81, 57.82, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By combining laparoscopy with traditional vaginal surgery, vNOTES offers advantages such as shorter surgery times, faster postoperative recovery, reduced hospital stays, greater minimal invasiveness, and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, it is essential for surgeons to continually enhance and standardize preoperative assessments and surgical techniques to minimize conversion rates and reduce intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Trial registry number: </strong>ChiCTR2200059282, China Clinical Trials Registry, April 28, 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11606056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)因其减少术后疼痛和无明显疤痕的优点而被广泛认可。然而,vNOTES所需的解剖特异性可能会增加附近器官(如直肠和膀胱)损伤的风险。本研究旨在评价vNOTES与经脐腹腔镜单部位子宫切除术(LESS)相比的安全性和潜在益处。方法:纵向阴道自然口腔内内镜手术研究(LovNOTESS)在中国成都进行,包括192例于2023年5月至10月接受子宫切除术的患者。本研究前瞻性地收集并比较了两组患者围手术期及随访资料。结果:vNOTES组手术时间短,术后排气时间短,住院时间短,但转换率也较高。具体而言,vNOTES方法将手术时间缩短了约29.8分钟(95% CI: -41.31, -18.34, P)。结论:将腹腔镜手术与传统阴道手术相结合,vNOTES具有手术时间更短、术后恢复更快、住院时间更短、微创性更强、美容效果更好等优势。然而,外科医生必须不断加强和规范术前评估和手术技术,以尽量减少转换率和术中出血量。试验注册号:ChiCTR2200059282,中国临床试验注册中心,2022年4月28日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Objective: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is widely recognized for its advantages, including reduced postoperative pain and the absence of visible scarring. However, the anatomical specificity required for vNOTES may increase the risk of injury to nearby organs, such as the rectum and bladder. This study aims to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of vNOTES compared to transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for Hysterectomy.

Methods: The Longitudinal Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Study (LovNOTESS), conducted in Chengdu, China, included 192 patients who underwent hysterectomy between May and October 2023. This study prospectively collected and compared perioperative and follow-up data between the two groups.

Results: The vNOTES group demonstrated shorter surgery times, postoperative flatus time, and hospital stays, but it also had a higher conversion rate. Specifically, the vNOTES approach reduced surgery duration by approximately 29.8 min (95% CI: -41.31, -18.34, P < 0.001) but increased intraoperative blood loss by about 41.82 mL (95% CI: 25.81, 57.82, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: By combining laparoscopy with traditional vaginal surgery, vNOTES offers advantages such as shorter surgery times, faster postoperative recovery, reduced hospital stays, greater minimal invasiveness, and improved cosmetic outcomes. However, it is essential for surgeons to continually enhance and standardize preoperative assessments and surgical techniques to minimize conversion rates and reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Trial registry number: ChiCTR2200059282, China Clinical Trials Registry, April 28, 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信