I Odsbu, A Hamina, V Hjellvik, M Handal, M Haram, M Tesli, A Tanskanen, H Taipale
{"title":"首次精神病发作后第一年开始使用抗精神病药物:一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"I Odsbu, A Hamina, V Hjellvik, M Handal, M Haram, M Tesli, A Tanskanen, H Taipale","doi":"10.1111/acps.13776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antipsychotics are recommended after first-episode psychosis. Knowledge on the current use patterns in real-world settings is thus important to inform clinical practice. We aimed to describe antipsychotic initiation during 1 year after first-episode psychosis and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based cohort study using linked nationwide health and population registers from Norway. The study population comprised 8052 persons aged 16-45 years with first-episode psychosis diagnosed in secondary care (ICD-10 F20, F22-F29) in the period 2011-2019. Initiation of antipsychotic use was defined as being dispensed antipsychotics (ATC N05A, excl. lithium) at least once from -90 to +365 days from secondary care diagnosis of first-episode psychosis. Antipsychotic polypharmacy during follow-up was defined as having at least 90 days with overlapping drug use periods modeled using the Prescriptions to Drug Use Periods method. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between socioeconomic and clinical factors and initiation of antipsychotic use were calculated using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4413 persons (54.8%) initiated antipsychotic use after first-episode psychosis with proportions ranging from 45.5% in 2012 to 62.1% in 2019. Oral formulations of olanzapine (34.9%), quetiapine (21.2%), and aripiprazole (11.6%) were most common at initiation, whereas long-acting injectables (LAIs) and clozapine were rarely used. Among the initiators, 13.8% started a polypharmacy period lasting more than 90 days. Factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were lower age (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21; 26-35 years vs. 36-45 years), higher education (1.11, 1.05-1.18), being employed (1.04, 1.00-1.09), being hospitalized (1.13, 1.09-1.18), being diagnosed late in the study period (1.16, 1.11-1.22; 2017-2019 vs. 2011-2013), or with previously diagnosed bipolar disorder, depression, or anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antipsychotic use pattern is largely within the current clinical guideline. Primary non-compliance and disease severity may explain the socioeconomic and clinical differences related to initiation of antipsychotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initiation of Antipsychotics During the First Year After First-Episode Psychosis: A Population-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"I Odsbu, A Hamina, V Hjellvik, M Handal, M Haram, M Tesli, A Tanskanen, H Taipale\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antipsychotics are recommended after first-episode psychosis. Knowledge on the current use patterns in real-world settings is thus important to inform clinical practice. We aimed to describe antipsychotic initiation during 1 year after first-episode psychosis and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based cohort study using linked nationwide health and population registers from Norway. The study population comprised 8052 persons aged 16-45 years with first-episode psychosis diagnosed in secondary care (ICD-10 F20, F22-F29) in the period 2011-2019. Initiation of antipsychotic use was defined as being dispensed antipsychotics (ATC N05A, excl. lithium) at least once from -90 to +365 days from secondary care diagnosis of first-episode psychosis. Antipsychotic polypharmacy during follow-up was defined as having at least 90 days with overlapping drug use periods modeled using the Prescriptions to Drug Use Periods method. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between socioeconomic and clinical factors and initiation of antipsychotic use were calculated using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 4413 persons (54.8%) initiated antipsychotic use after first-episode psychosis with proportions ranging from 45.5% in 2012 to 62.1% in 2019. Oral formulations of olanzapine (34.9%), quetiapine (21.2%), and aripiprazole (11.6%) were most common at initiation, whereas long-acting injectables (LAIs) and clozapine were rarely used. Among the initiators, 13.8% started a polypharmacy period lasting more than 90 days. Factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were lower age (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21; 26-35 years vs. 36-45 years), higher education (1.11, 1.05-1.18), being employed (1.04, 1.00-1.09), being hospitalized (1.13, 1.09-1.18), being diagnosed late in the study period (1.16, 1.11-1.22; 2017-2019 vs. 2011-2013), or with previously diagnosed bipolar disorder, depression, or anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The antipsychotic use pattern is largely within the current clinical guideline. Primary non-compliance and disease severity may explain the socioeconomic and clinical differences related to initiation of antipsychotic use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13776\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:首次精神病发作后推荐使用抗精神病药物。因此,了解现实世界中目前的使用模式对临床实践非常重要。我们的目的是描述首次精神病发作后1年内的抗精神病药物起始治疗及其相关因素。方法:基于人群的队列研究,使用挪威全国健康和人口登记。研究人群包括2011-2019年期间8052名年龄在16-45岁、在二级医疗诊断为首发精神病(icd - 10f20, F22-F29)的患者。开始使用抗精神病药物定义为在二级护理诊断为首发精神病后-90至+365天内至少使用一次抗精神病药物(ATC N05A,不包括锂)。随访期间的抗精神病药物多重用药定义为使用处方到用药周期方法建模的重叠用药期至少90天。使用修正泊松回归计算社会经济和临床因素与开始使用抗精神病药物之间关联的校正风险比(aRRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:共有4413人(54.8%)在首发精神病后开始使用抗精神病药物,比例从2012年的45.5%到2019年的62.1%不等。口服制剂奥氮平(34.9%)、喹硫平(21.2%)和阿立哌唑(11.6%)最常见,而长效注射剂(LAIs)和氯氮平很少使用。在发起者中,有13.8%的人开始了超过90天的多药期。与抗精神病药物起始相关的因素为年龄较低(aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21;26-35岁vs. 36-45岁),高等教育(1.11,1.05-1.18),在职(1.04,1.00-1.09),住院(1.13,1.09-1.18),研究后期诊断(1.16,1.11-1.22;2017-2019年与2011-2013年),或先前诊断为双相情感障碍、抑郁症或焦虑症的患者。结论:抗精神病药物的使用模式基本符合现行临床指南。原发性不依从性和疾病严重程度可以解释与开始使用抗精神病药物相关的社会经济和临床差异。
Initiation of Antipsychotics During the First Year After First-Episode Psychosis: A Population-Based Study.
Background: Antipsychotics are recommended after first-episode psychosis. Knowledge on the current use patterns in real-world settings is thus important to inform clinical practice. We aimed to describe antipsychotic initiation during 1 year after first-episode psychosis and its associated factors.
Methods: Population-based cohort study using linked nationwide health and population registers from Norway. The study population comprised 8052 persons aged 16-45 years with first-episode psychosis diagnosed in secondary care (ICD-10 F20, F22-F29) in the period 2011-2019. Initiation of antipsychotic use was defined as being dispensed antipsychotics (ATC N05A, excl. lithium) at least once from -90 to +365 days from secondary care diagnosis of first-episode psychosis. Antipsychotic polypharmacy during follow-up was defined as having at least 90 days with overlapping drug use periods modeled using the Prescriptions to Drug Use Periods method. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between socioeconomic and clinical factors and initiation of antipsychotic use were calculated using modified Poisson regression.
Results: In total, 4413 persons (54.8%) initiated antipsychotic use after first-episode psychosis with proportions ranging from 45.5% in 2012 to 62.1% in 2019. Oral formulations of olanzapine (34.9%), quetiapine (21.2%), and aripiprazole (11.6%) were most common at initiation, whereas long-acting injectables (LAIs) and clozapine were rarely used. Among the initiators, 13.8% started a polypharmacy period lasting more than 90 days. Factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were lower age (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21; 26-35 years vs. 36-45 years), higher education (1.11, 1.05-1.18), being employed (1.04, 1.00-1.09), being hospitalized (1.13, 1.09-1.18), being diagnosed late in the study period (1.16, 1.11-1.22; 2017-2019 vs. 2011-2013), or with previously diagnosed bipolar disorder, depression, or anxiety disorders.
Conclusions: The antipsychotic use pattern is largely within the current clinical guideline. Primary non-compliance and disease severity may explain the socioeconomic and clinical differences related to initiation of antipsychotic use.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.