异时性和噬卵性是巨型滤食性板状鲨鱼进化的基础

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Joel H. Gayford, Duncan J. Irschick, Andrew Chin, Jodie L. Rummer
{"title":"异时性和噬卵性是巨型滤食性板状鲨鱼进化的基础","authors":"Joel H. Gayford,&nbsp;Duncan J. Irschick,&nbsp;Andrew Chin,&nbsp;Jodie L. Rummer","doi":"10.1111/ede.12496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evolutionary transitions toward gigantic body sizes have profound consequences for the structure and dynamics of ecological networks. Among elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), gigantism has evolved on several occasions, most notably in the iconic Megalodon (<i>Otodus megalodon</i>†) and the extant whale shark (<i>Rhincodon typus</i>), basking shark (<i>Cetorhinus maximus</i>), and megamouth shark (<i>Megachasma pelagios</i>), all of which reach total lengths exceeding 6 m and, in some cases, reach 21 m or more. Comparative phylogenetic studies suggest that filter feeding and heterothermy provide two alternative evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in sharks. These selection-based explanations for gigantism are important; however, our understanding of evolutionary transitions in body size is fundamentally constrained without a proximate, mechanistic understanding of how the suite of adaptations necessary to facilitate gigantism evolved. Here we propose the heterochrony hypothesis for the evolution of the giant filter-feeding shark ecomorphotype. We suggest that craniofacial adaptations for oophagy in embryonic stages of lamniform sharks are retained through ontogeny in <i>C. maximus</i> and <i>M. pelagios</i> by paedomorphosis, resulting in an enlarged head and mouth relative to the rest of the body, even in adulthood. This change in developmental timing enables these taxa to optimize prey acquisition, which is thought to be the limiting factor for the evolution of gigantism in filter-feeding marine vertebrates. We discuss the concordance of this hypothesis with current developmental, morphological, and evolutionary data, and we suggest future means by which the hypothesis could be tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":12083,"journal":{"name":"Evolution & Development","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ede.12496","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterochrony and Oophagy Underlie the Evolution of Giant Filter-Feeding Lamniform Sharks\",\"authors\":\"Joel H. Gayford,&nbsp;Duncan J. Irschick,&nbsp;Andrew Chin,&nbsp;Jodie L. Rummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ede.12496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Evolutionary transitions toward gigantic body sizes have profound consequences for the structure and dynamics of ecological networks. Among elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), gigantism has evolved on several occasions, most notably in the iconic Megalodon (<i>Otodus megalodon</i>†) and the extant whale shark (<i>Rhincodon typus</i>), basking shark (<i>Cetorhinus maximus</i>), and megamouth shark (<i>Megachasma pelagios</i>), all of which reach total lengths exceeding 6 m and, in some cases, reach 21 m or more. Comparative phylogenetic studies suggest that filter feeding and heterothermy provide two alternative evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in sharks. These selection-based explanations for gigantism are important; however, our understanding of evolutionary transitions in body size is fundamentally constrained without a proximate, mechanistic understanding of how the suite of adaptations necessary to facilitate gigantism evolved. Here we propose the heterochrony hypothesis for the evolution of the giant filter-feeding shark ecomorphotype. We suggest that craniofacial adaptations for oophagy in embryonic stages of lamniform sharks are retained through ontogeny in <i>C. maximus</i> and <i>M. pelagios</i> by paedomorphosis, resulting in an enlarged head and mouth relative to the rest of the body, even in adulthood. This change in developmental timing enables these taxa to optimize prey acquisition, which is thought to be the limiting factor for the evolution of gigantism in filter-feeding marine vertebrates. We discuss the concordance of this hypothesis with current developmental, morphological, and evolutionary data, and we suggest future means by which the hypothesis could be tested.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution & Development\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ede.12496\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ede.12496\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution & Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ede.12496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向巨大体型的进化转变对生态网络的结构和动态有着深远的影响。在鲨科动物(鲨鱼和鳐鱼)中,巨人症在一些情况下已经进化出来,最明显的是标志性的巨齿鲨(Otodus Megalodon†)和现存的鲸鲨(Rhincodon typus)、姥鲨(Cetorhinus maximus)和巨嘴鲨(Megachasma pelagios),它们的总长度都超过6米,有些甚至达到21米以上。比较系统发育研究表明,滤食性和异温性提供了两种导致鲨鱼巨人症的进化途径。这些基于选择的巨人症解释很重要;然而,我们对体型进化转变的理解从根本上是有限的,没有对促进巨人症所需的一系列适应是如何进化的近似的、机械的理解。本文提出了巨型滤食性鲨鱼生态形态进化的异时假说。我们认为,板形鲨在胚胎阶段对噬卵的颅面适应,在C. maximus和M. pelagios的个体发育中,通过幼体发育得以保留,导致头部和嘴相对于身体其他部分增大,即使在成年期也是如此。这种发育时间的变化使这些分类群能够优化猎物获取,这被认为是滤食性海洋脊椎动物巨人症进化的限制因素。我们讨论了这一假设与当前的发育、形态和进化数据的一致性,并提出了未来可以检验这一假设的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Heterochrony and Oophagy Underlie the Evolution of Giant Filter-Feeding Lamniform Sharks

Heterochrony and Oophagy Underlie the Evolution of Giant Filter-Feeding Lamniform Sharks

Evolutionary transitions toward gigantic body sizes have profound consequences for the structure and dynamics of ecological networks. Among elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), gigantism has evolved on several occasions, most notably in the iconic Megalodon (Otodus megalodon†) and the extant whale shark (Rhincodon typus), basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus), and megamouth shark (Megachasma pelagios), all of which reach total lengths exceeding 6 m and, in some cases, reach 21 m or more. Comparative phylogenetic studies suggest that filter feeding and heterothermy provide two alternative evolutionary pathways leading to gigantism in sharks. These selection-based explanations for gigantism are important; however, our understanding of evolutionary transitions in body size is fundamentally constrained without a proximate, mechanistic understanding of how the suite of adaptations necessary to facilitate gigantism evolved. Here we propose the heterochrony hypothesis for the evolution of the giant filter-feeding shark ecomorphotype. We suggest that craniofacial adaptations for oophagy in embryonic stages of lamniform sharks are retained through ontogeny in C. maximus and M. pelagios by paedomorphosis, resulting in an enlarged head and mouth relative to the rest of the body, even in adulthood. This change in developmental timing enables these taxa to optimize prey acquisition, which is thought to be the limiting factor for the evolution of gigantism in filter-feeding marine vertebrates. We discuss the concordance of this hypothesis with current developmental, morphological, and evolutionary data, and we suggest future means by which the hypothesis could be tested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution & Development
Evolution & Development 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology. The exciting re-integration of these two fields, after almost a century''s separation, holds much promise as the focus of a broader synthesis of biological thought. Evolution & Development publishes works that address the evolution/development interface from a diversity of angles. The journal welcomes papers from paleontologists, population biologists, developmental biologists, and molecular biologists, but also encourages submissions from professionals in other fields where relevant research is being carried out, from mathematics to the history and philosophy of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信