污水管网中胶凝材料性能评估的实验室方法的比较评价:生物和化学试验与现场暴露

IF 10.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Alexandra Bertron , Cyrill Grengg , Matthieu Peyre Lavigne , Holger Wack , Gregor J.G. Gluth , Amr Aboulela , Vanessa Sonois , Tilman Gehrke , Florian Mittermayr
{"title":"污水管网中胶凝材料性能评估的实验室方法的比较评价:生物和化学试验与现场暴露","authors":"Alexandra Bertron ,&nbsp;Cyrill Grengg ,&nbsp;Matthieu Peyre Lavigne ,&nbsp;Holger Wack ,&nbsp;Gregor J.G. Gluth ,&nbsp;Amr Aboulela ,&nbsp;Vanessa Sonois ,&nbsp;Tilman Gehrke ,&nbsp;Florian Mittermayr","doi":"10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The biodeterioration of concrete elements in sewer systems and their repair is of significant economic and societal concern. However, the available test methods to assess the performance of cementitious materials under the relevant conditions are insufficiently validated. In the present study, two biological test methods and a standardised chemical test were applied to two sewer repair mortars and a reference mortar, and the performances of these materials were compared in a severely deteriorating sewer environment. In both biological tests, the induction period was considerably shorter than that of the field, and time-resolved recording of durability indicators enabled to determine deterioration rates in the steady-state regime, which compared reasonably well with each other and with the behaviour in the sewer environment. The chemical test does not allow to obtain a deterioration rate, and the observed relative performance differences of the mortars deviated from the results of the biological tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":266,"journal":{"name":"Cement and Concrete Research","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 107741"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of laboratory methods for performance assessment of cementitious materials in wastewater networks: Biological and chemical tests versus field exposure\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Bertron ,&nbsp;Cyrill Grengg ,&nbsp;Matthieu Peyre Lavigne ,&nbsp;Holger Wack ,&nbsp;Gregor J.G. Gluth ,&nbsp;Amr Aboulela ,&nbsp;Vanessa Sonois ,&nbsp;Tilman Gehrke ,&nbsp;Florian Mittermayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The biodeterioration of concrete elements in sewer systems and their repair is of significant economic and societal concern. However, the available test methods to assess the performance of cementitious materials under the relevant conditions are insufficiently validated. In the present study, two biological test methods and a standardised chemical test were applied to two sewer repair mortars and a reference mortar, and the performances of these materials were compared in a severely deteriorating sewer environment. In both biological tests, the induction period was considerably shorter than that of the field, and time-resolved recording of durability indicators enabled to determine deterioration rates in the steady-state regime, which compared reasonably well with each other and with the behaviour in the sewer environment. The chemical test does not allow to obtain a deterioration rate, and the observed relative performance differences of the mortars deviated from the results of the biological tests.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cement and Concrete Research\",\"volume\":\"188 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cement and Concrete Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884624003223\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cement and Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884624003223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下水道系统中混凝土元素的生物降解及其修复是一个重大的经济和社会问题。然而,在相关条件下评估胶凝材料性能的现有测试方法尚未得到充分验证。本研究采用两种生物测试方法和标准化化学测试方法对两种下水道修复砂浆和一种参考砂浆进行测试,并在严重恶化的下水道环境中对这些材料的性能进行了比较。在这两项生物试验中,诱导期都比田间试验短得多,耐久性指标的时间分辨记录能够确定稳定状态下的劣化率,这两项指标相互比较并与下水道环境中的行为相比较都相当好。化学试验不能得到劣化率,而且所观察到的砂浆的相对性能差异与生物试验的结果有偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of laboratory methods for performance assessment of cementitious materials in wastewater networks: Biological and chemical tests versus field exposure
The biodeterioration of concrete elements in sewer systems and their repair is of significant economic and societal concern. However, the available test methods to assess the performance of cementitious materials under the relevant conditions are insufficiently validated. In the present study, two biological test methods and a standardised chemical test were applied to two sewer repair mortars and a reference mortar, and the performances of these materials were compared in a severely deteriorating sewer environment. In both biological tests, the induction period was considerably shorter than that of the field, and time-resolved recording of durability indicators enabled to determine deterioration rates in the steady-state regime, which compared reasonably well with each other and with the behaviour in the sewer environment. The chemical test does not allow to obtain a deterioration rate, and the observed relative performance differences of the mortars deviated from the results of the biological tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cement and Concrete Research
Cement and Concrete Research 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
12.30%
发文量
318
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cement and Concrete Research is dedicated to publishing top-notch research on the materials science and engineering of cement, cement composites, mortars, concrete, and related materials incorporating cement or other mineral binders. The journal prioritizes reporting significant findings in research on the properties and performance of cementitious materials. It also covers novel experimental techniques, the latest analytical and modeling methods, examination and diagnosis of actual cement and concrete structures, and the exploration of potential improvements in materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信