家庭护理人员如何在专业和个人方面体验客户的死亡?系统综述与元综合。

Omega Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1177/00302228241302431
Gillian Mhairi Findlay, Noelle Robertson
{"title":"家庭护理人员如何在专业和个人方面体验客户的死亡?系统综述与元综合。","authors":"Gillian Mhairi Findlay, Noelle Robertson","doi":"10.1177/00302228241302431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Home care workers (HCWs) may frequently experience client death. This critical interpretive meta-synthesis aimed to identify the impacts of client death to offer preliminary recommendations with respect to support. <b>Method:</b> Five electronic databases, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched systematically using keywords and subject headings. <b>Results:</b> <i>Eight papers focusing on HCWs' experiences of client death were identified</i>. <i>Constructs were elicited and interpreted via Reciprocal Translation Analysis</i>. <i>The interpreted line of argument highlighted four interrelated themes: ''Personal grief: The impact of loss', 'Disenfranchised grief: no space for humanity and connection'', Inherent tension between self-care and organisational expectations: \"You need a moment to hit the reset\", and 'I wish someone was there to talk to: HCW support needs'</i>. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings demonstrate that HCWs are affected in multiple ways by client death, but these impacts are not consistently recognised or responded to by their organisations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"302228241302431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Home Care Workers Experience A Client's Death, Professionally and Personally? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Mhairi Findlay, Noelle Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00302228241302431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Home care workers (HCWs) may frequently experience client death. This critical interpretive meta-synthesis aimed to identify the impacts of client death to offer preliminary recommendations with respect to support. <b>Method:</b> Five electronic databases, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched systematically using keywords and subject headings. <b>Results:</b> <i>Eight papers focusing on HCWs' experiences of client death were identified</i>. <i>Constructs were elicited and interpreted via Reciprocal Translation Analysis</i>. <i>The interpreted line of argument highlighted four interrelated themes: ''Personal grief: The impact of loss', 'Disenfranchised grief: no space for humanity and connection'', Inherent tension between self-care and organisational expectations: \\\"You need a moment to hit the reset\\\", and 'I wish someone was there to talk to: HCW support needs'</i>. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings demonstrate that HCWs are affected in multiple ways by client death, but these impacts are not consistently recognised or responded to by their organisations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"302228241302431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241302431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228241302431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家庭护理工作者(HCWs)可能经常遇到客户死亡。这一重要的解释性综合研究旨在确定病人死亡的影响,并就支持提供初步建议。方法:系统检索APA PsycINFO、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus 5个电子数据库,采用关键词和主题词进行检索。结果:共收录了八篇关于卫生保健工作者病人死亡经历的论文。构念通过对等翻译分析得到并解释。解释后的论点强调了四个相互关联的主题:“个人悲伤:失去的影响”,“被剥夺权利的悲伤:没有人性和联系的空间”,自我照顾和组织期望之间的内在紧张关系:“你需要一点时间重新开始”,以及“我希望有人在那里说话:HCW支持需求”。结论:研究结果表明,卫生保健工作者受到客户死亡的多重影响,但这些影响并没有得到他们所在组织的一致认可或回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Do Home Care Workers Experience A Client's Death, Professionally and Personally? A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Background: Home care workers (HCWs) may frequently experience client death. This critical interpretive meta-synthesis aimed to identify the impacts of client death to offer preliminary recommendations with respect to support. Method: Five electronic databases, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, were searched systematically using keywords and subject headings. Results: Eight papers focusing on HCWs' experiences of client death were identified. Constructs were elicited and interpreted via Reciprocal Translation Analysis. The interpreted line of argument highlighted four interrelated themes: ''Personal grief: The impact of loss', 'Disenfranchised grief: no space for humanity and connection'', Inherent tension between self-care and organisational expectations: "You need a moment to hit the reset", and 'I wish someone was there to talk to: HCW support needs'. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that HCWs are affected in multiple ways by client death, but these impacts are not consistently recognised or responded to by their organisations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信