青少年足球守门员专项运动协调性评价。

Fynn Bergmann, Florian Schultz, Job Fransen, Oliver Höner
{"title":"青少年足球守门员专项运动协调性评价。","authors":"Fynn Bergmann, Florian Schultz, Job Fransen, Oliver Höner","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2024.2429486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Talent identification and development (TID) in football can be enhanced through objective assessments of talent predictors. Yet, available instruments rarely consider the unique demands of goalkeepers (GKs). During early phases of talent development, considering a GK's giftedness relating to, for example, different abilities (e.g. motor coordination), can complement views on highly specialized GK-specific attributes (e.g. technical skills). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a GK-specific motor coordination assessment to support TID in football at early developmental phases. Six tests were designed to assess ball control relevant to GKs. Their content and face validity were confirmed by independent experts (<i>N</i> = 8). The assessment was evaluated with GKs selected for the German Football Association's TID program (U12-U15; <i>N</i> = 120). This study examined the assessment's test-retest reliability and agreement, the structural validity, and the concurrent validity. The overall test score demonstrated good test-retest reliability, although some individual tests showed lower coefficients. Additionally, limited agreement between repeated measurements due to considerable measurement error as well as issues with the structural validity of the test battery were identified. Nevertheless, the findings support the assessment's concurrent validity as higher-rated (i.e. more talented) GKs outperformed lower-rated individuals. Yet, the test battery's diagnostic accuracy is not high enough to justify individual decisions for talent selection. Overall, these findings support the consideration of motor coordination as a talent predictor in youth GKs and emphasize the assessment's potential to enhance coaches' evaluations. The identified psychometric weaknesses in some individual tests provide impetus to further optimize the test battery.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a goalkeeper-specific motor coordination assessment in youth football.\",\"authors\":\"Fynn Bergmann, Florian Schultz, Job Fransen, Oliver Höner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24733938.2024.2429486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Talent identification and development (TID) in football can be enhanced through objective assessments of talent predictors. Yet, available instruments rarely consider the unique demands of goalkeepers (GKs). During early phases of talent development, considering a GK's giftedness relating to, for example, different abilities (e.g. motor coordination), can complement views on highly specialized GK-specific attributes (e.g. technical skills). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a GK-specific motor coordination assessment to support TID in football at early developmental phases. Six tests were designed to assess ball control relevant to GKs. Their content and face validity were confirmed by independent experts (<i>N</i> = 8). The assessment was evaluated with GKs selected for the German Football Association's TID program (U12-U15; <i>N</i> = 120). This study examined the assessment's test-retest reliability and agreement, the structural validity, and the concurrent validity. The overall test score demonstrated good test-retest reliability, although some individual tests showed lower coefficients. Additionally, limited agreement between repeated measurements due to considerable measurement error as well as issues with the structural validity of the test battery were identified. Nevertheless, the findings support the assessment's concurrent validity as higher-rated (i.e. more talented) GKs outperformed lower-rated individuals. Yet, the test battery's diagnostic accuracy is not high enough to justify individual decisions for talent selection. Overall, these findings support the consideration of motor coordination as a talent predictor in youth GKs and emphasize the assessment's potential to enhance coaches' evaluations. The identified psychometric weaknesses in some individual tests provide impetus to further optimize the test battery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & medicine in football\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2429486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2429486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对足球人才预测因子的客观评价,可以促进足球人才的识别与发展。然而,现有的工具很少考虑到守门员(GKs)的独特需求。在天赋发展的早期阶段,考虑到GK的天赋,例如,不同的能力(如运动协调),可以补充高度专业化的GK特定属性(如技术技能)的观点。因此,本研究旨在评估gk特异性运动协调评估,以支持足球早期发展阶段的TID。设计了六项测试来评估与GKs相关的控球能力。其内容和面孔效度由独立专家确认(N = 8)。评估是用德国足协TID项目(U12-U15;n = 120)。本研究检验了量表的重测信度与一致性、结构效度、并发效度。总体测试成绩表现出良好的重测信度,尽管一些个别测试显示出较低的系数。此外,由于相当大的测量误差以及测试电池的结构有效性问题,确定了重复测量之间的有限一致性。然而,研究结果支持该评估的并发效度,因为高评级(即更有天赋)的GKs比低评级的个体表现得更好。然而,测试电池的诊断准确性还不够高,不足以证明个人选择人才的决定是正确的。总的来说,这些发现支持了运动协调作为青少年GKs天赋预测因子的考虑,并强调了评估的潜力,以提高教练的评估。在个别测试中发现的心理测量弱点为进一步优化测试组提供了动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of a goalkeeper-specific motor coordination assessment in youth football.

Talent identification and development (TID) in football can be enhanced through objective assessments of talent predictors. Yet, available instruments rarely consider the unique demands of goalkeepers (GKs). During early phases of talent development, considering a GK's giftedness relating to, for example, different abilities (e.g. motor coordination), can complement views on highly specialized GK-specific attributes (e.g. technical skills). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate a GK-specific motor coordination assessment to support TID in football at early developmental phases. Six tests were designed to assess ball control relevant to GKs. Their content and face validity were confirmed by independent experts (N = 8). The assessment was evaluated with GKs selected for the German Football Association's TID program (U12-U15; N = 120). This study examined the assessment's test-retest reliability and agreement, the structural validity, and the concurrent validity. The overall test score demonstrated good test-retest reliability, although some individual tests showed lower coefficients. Additionally, limited agreement between repeated measurements due to considerable measurement error as well as issues with the structural validity of the test battery were identified. Nevertheless, the findings support the assessment's concurrent validity as higher-rated (i.e. more talented) GKs outperformed lower-rated individuals. Yet, the test battery's diagnostic accuracy is not high enough to justify individual decisions for talent selection. Overall, these findings support the consideration of motor coordination as a talent predictor in youth GKs and emphasize the assessment's potential to enhance coaches' evaluations. The identified psychometric weaknesses in some individual tests provide impetus to further optimize the test battery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信