采用实时德尔菲法,建立基于共识的框架,以改善居家养老护理的护理评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Margaret Fry, Kate Curtis, Julie Considine, Catherine Viengkham, Karen Watson, Moira Dunsmore, Ramon Z. Shaban
{"title":"采用实时德尔菲法,建立基于共识的框架,以改善居家养老护理的护理评估。","authors":"Margaret Fry,&nbsp;Kate Curtis,&nbsp;Julie Considine,&nbsp;Catherine Viengkham,&nbsp;Karen Watson,&nbsp;Moira Dunsmore,&nbsp;Ramon Z. Shaban","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence-based tools are needed to support aged care nurses in recognising and responding to changes in residents' conditions and clinical deterioration. Systematised emergency nursing frameworks such as HIRAID® (<b>H</b>istory including <b>I</b>nfection risk, <b>R</b>ed flags, <b>A</b>ssessment, <b>I</b>nterventions, <b>D</b>iagnostics, reassessment and communication) assist nurses in accurately assessing and documenting a patient's condition and identifying and prioritising care needs. This study aimed to adapt the HIRAID® emergency nursing framework for use in the residential aged care setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A real-time Delphi method was employed to contextually adapt the HIRAID® framework. Twelve expert health-care clinical leaders with understanding of patient assessment and residential aged care management were recruited through purposive sampling. Panel consensus was established a priori at 80%. A secondary measure of panel stability was used to understand panel consensus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Consensus was reached after two survey rounds. In Round 1, 105 (88%) of 119 items were accepted after reaching consensus. In Round 2, all remaining 29 items reached consensus, whereby 20 were accepted and nine rejected. Key modifications were identified for ‘History’, which needed to consider more comprehensive and adaptive techniques, and ‘Interventions’ and ‘Diagnostics’, where differences arose in the scope of practice of aged care nurses compared to their acute care counterparts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study demonstrated how a small expert multidisciplinary health-care panel can be stable and reach consensus to adapt and contextualise an emergency care framework to the aged care setting. These findings will form the content to scaffold educational resources to support learning and practice change.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using real-time Delphi methods to develop a consensus-based framework to improve nursing assessment in residential aged care\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Fry,&nbsp;Kate Curtis,&nbsp;Julie Considine,&nbsp;Catherine Viengkham,&nbsp;Karen Watson,&nbsp;Moira Dunsmore,&nbsp;Ramon Z. Shaban\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajag.13387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evidence-based tools are needed to support aged care nurses in recognising and responding to changes in residents' conditions and clinical deterioration. Systematised emergency nursing frameworks such as HIRAID® (<b>H</b>istory including <b>I</b>nfection risk, <b>R</b>ed flags, <b>A</b>ssessment, <b>I</b>nterventions, <b>D</b>iagnostics, reassessment and communication) assist nurses in accurately assessing and documenting a patient's condition and identifying and prioritising care needs. This study aimed to adapt the HIRAID® emergency nursing framework for use in the residential aged care setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A real-time Delphi method was employed to contextually adapt the HIRAID® framework. Twelve expert health-care clinical leaders with understanding of patient assessment and residential aged care management were recruited through purposive sampling. Panel consensus was established a priori at 80%. A secondary measure of panel stability was used to understand panel consensus.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Consensus was reached after two survey rounds. In Round 1, 105 (88%) of 119 items were accepted after reaching consensus. In Round 2, all remaining 29 items reached consensus, whereby 20 were accepted and nine rejected. Key modifications were identified for ‘History’, which needed to consider more comprehensive and adaptive techniques, and ‘Interventions’ and ‘Diagnostics’, where differences arose in the scope of practice of aged care nurses compared to their acute care counterparts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study demonstrated how a small expert multidisciplinary health-care panel can be stable and reach consensus to adapt and contextualise an emergency care framework to the aged care setting. These findings will form the content to scaffold educational resources to support learning and practice change.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal on Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:需要循证工具来支持老年护理护士认识和应对居民状况和临床恶化的变化。系统化的急救护理框架,如HIRAID®(包括感染风险、危险信号、评估、干预、诊断、重新评估和沟通的历史),帮助护士准确评估和记录患者的病情,并确定和优先考虑护理需求。本研究旨在将HIRAID®紧急护理框架应用于居家老年护理环境。方法:采用实时德尔菲法对HIRAID®框架进行情境调整。本研究采用有目的抽样的方法,招募12名了解病人评估和居家养老管理的医疗保健临床专家领导。小组共识先验地建立在80%。小组稳定性的第二个衡量标准被用来理解小组的共识。结果:经过两轮调查,达成共识。在第1轮中,119项中的105项(88%)在达成共识后被接受。在第二轮中,所有剩余的29个项目达成协商一致,其中接受20个,拒绝9个。确定了“历史”的关键修改,需要考虑更全面和适应性的技术,以及“干预”和“诊断”,其中老年护理护士的实践范围与急性护理同行相比存在差异。结论:该研究证明了一个小的多学科专家保健小组如何能够稳定并达成共识,以适应和情境化紧急护理框架,以适应老年护理环境。这些发现将形成内容,以支撑教育资源,以支持学习和实践的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using real-time Delphi methods to develop a consensus-based framework to improve nursing assessment in residential aged care

Objectives

Evidence-based tools are needed to support aged care nurses in recognising and responding to changes in residents' conditions and clinical deterioration. Systematised emergency nursing frameworks such as HIRAID® (History including Infection risk, Red flags, Assessment, Interventions, Diagnostics, reassessment and communication) assist nurses in accurately assessing and documenting a patient's condition and identifying and prioritising care needs. This study aimed to adapt the HIRAID® emergency nursing framework for use in the residential aged care setting.

Methods

A real-time Delphi method was employed to contextually adapt the HIRAID® framework. Twelve expert health-care clinical leaders with understanding of patient assessment and residential aged care management were recruited through purposive sampling. Panel consensus was established a priori at 80%. A secondary measure of panel stability was used to understand panel consensus.

Results

Consensus was reached after two survey rounds. In Round 1, 105 (88%) of 119 items were accepted after reaching consensus. In Round 2, all remaining 29 items reached consensus, whereby 20 were accepted and nine rejected. Key modifications were identified for ‘History’, which needed to consider more comprehensive and adaptive techniques, and ‘Interventions’ and ‘Diagnostics’, where differences arose in the scope of practice of aged care nurses compared to their acute care counterparts.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated how a small expert multidisciplinary health-care panel can be stable and reach consensus to adapt and contextualise an emergency care framework to the aged care setting. These findings will form the content to scaffold educational resources to support learning and practice change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信