术中光学相干断层成像评估前房气体充盈。

IF 0.9
Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764
Michael Tseng, Avrey Thau, Carla Berkowitz, Abhijit Ramaprasad, Surendra Basti
{"title":"术中光学相干断层成像评估前房气体充盈。","authors":"Michael Tseng, Avrey Thau, Carla Berkowitz, Abhijit Ramaprasad, Surendra Basti","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During endothelial keratoplasty, anterior chamber gas is titrated to a desired fill, which is difficult to optimize by visualization alone. This study evaluates how an anterior chamber gas fill correlates with intraocular pressure (IOP) and iris-angle configuration as identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven cadaveric eyes were studied in three configurations: baseline, air-fill just spanning limbus-to-limbus (\"full-fill\"), and air-fill maximally filling the anterior chamber (\"overfill\"). At each configuration, IOP was measured by Tonopen and iris-angle was determined by analyzing OCT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in IOP or irisangles were identified between baseline and full-fill configurations (p=0.113 and p=0.152, respectively). When compared to overfill configuration, differences in IOP and iris-angles were identified for baseline (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and full-fill configuration (p=0.001 and p=0.039, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight that en-face visualization of full-fill may not be indicative of IOP elevation. A significant difference in IOP and iris-angle exists between full-fill and overfill configurations. Intraoperative OCT can serve as a useful surrogate to identify the extent of fill.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1488764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Tseng, Avrey Thau, Carla Berkowitz, Abhijit Ramaprasad, Surendra Basti\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During endothelial keratoplasty, anterior chamber gas is titrated to a desired fill, which is difficult to optimize by visualization alone. This study evaluates how an anterior chamber gas fill correlates with intraocular pressure (IOP) and iris-angle configuration as identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven cadaveric eyes were studied in three configurations: baseline, air-fill just spanning limbus-to-limbus (\\\"full-fill\\\"), and air-fill maximally filling the anterior chamber (\\\"overfill\\\"). At each configuration, IOP was measured by Tonopen and iris-angle was determined by analyzing OCT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences in IOP or irisangles were identified between baseline and full-fill configurations (p=0.113 and p=0.152, respectively). When compared to overfill configuration, differences in IOP and iris-angles were identified for baseline (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and full-fill configuration (p=0.001 and p=0.039, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight that en-face visualization of full-fill may not be indicative of IOP elevation. A significant difference in IOP and iris-angle exists between full-fill and overfill configurations. Intraoperative OCT can serve as a useful surrogate to identify the extent of fill.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1488764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1488764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在内皮角膜移植术中,前房气体被滴定到所需的填充,这很难通过单独的可视化来优化。本研究评估了通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)识别的前房气体填充与眼内压(IOP)和虹膜角度结构的相关性。方法:对11只尸体眼进行三种形态的研究:基线、充气刚好跨越眼缘到眼缘(“全充”)和充气最大程度地填充前房(“过充”)。在每种构型下,通过Tonopen测量IOP,通过分析OCT图像确定虹膜角度。结果:在基线和全填充配置之间,IOP和虹膜没有差异(p=0.113和p=0.152)。当与过填充配置进行比较时,确定了IOP和虹膜角度的基线差异(讨论:这些研究结果强调,满填充的正面可视化可能不能指示IOP升高。全补眼和过补眼在IOP和虹膜角度上存在显著差异。术中OCT可作为确定填充程度的有用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.

Intraoperative optical coherence tomography imaging for assessment of anterior chamber gas fill.

Introduction: During endothelial keratoplasty, anterior chamber gas is titrated to a desired fill, which is difficult to optimize by visualization alone. This study evaluates how an anterior chamber gas fill correlates with intraocular pressure (IOP) and iris-angle configuration as identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Methods: Eleven cadaveric eyes were studied in three configurations: baseline, air-fill just spanning limbus-to-limbus ("full-fill"), and air-fill maximally filling the anterior chamber ("overfill"). At each configuration, IOP was measured by Tonopen and iris-angle was determined by analyzing OCT images.

Results: No differences in IOP or irisangles were identified between baseline and full-fill configurations (p=0.113 and p=0.152, respectively). When compared to overfill configuration, differences in IOP and iris-angles were identified for baseline (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively) and full-fill configuration (p=0.001 and p=0.039, respectively).

Discussion: These findings highlight that en-face visualization of full-fill may not be indicative of IOP elevation. A significant difference in IOP and iris-angle exists between full-fill and overfill configurations. Intraoperative OCT can serve as a useful surrogate to identify the extent of fill.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信