设定目标抗生素使用在欧洲的一般做法:范围审查。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
European Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507
Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela, Kevin Roche, Heike Vornhagen, Aoife Moran, Scott Walkin, Walter Cullen, Catherine Blake, Akke Vellinga
{"title":"设定目标抗生素使用在欧洲的一般做法:范围审查。","authors":"Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela, Kevin Roche, Heike Vornhagen, Aoife Moran, Scott Walkin, Walter Cullen, Catherine Blake, Akke Vellinga","doi":"10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National Action Plans (NAPs) aim to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) understanding and awareness but struggle to translate targets into clinically relevant guidance for general practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and map antibiotic use targets in European general practice and explore if and how these targets are linked to NAPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE and SCOPUS, with additional manual searches. The research questions were: What are existing targets for antibiotic use in general practice in the 31 European countries? and How are these targets linked to the NAPs on AMR?. The results are presented narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 reports were included, of which 33 focused on national targets and general practice or linking national and local targets. Reports describe local strategies to achieve targets, such as prescriber feedback, benchmarking systems and financial incentives. However, these reports provide aggregated targets for general practice, such as a percentage reduction of antibiotics prescribed. These targets are set in general, for a specific type of antibiotic, for an amount per number of patients, in defined daily doses or items. None of the reports translate national targets into clinically relevant or practical targets for general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most European countries have an NAP with established targets, but the type and implementation of these targets vary between nations. Translating national targets into daily clinical practice is challenging and often lacks the involvement of prescribers. Aligning national and local targets would enhance coherence and more effectively contribute to improvements in antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":54380,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of General Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"2430507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Setting targets for antibiotic use in general practice in Europe: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela, Kevin Roche, Heike Vornhagen, Aoife Moran, Scott Walkin, Walter Cullen, Catherine Blake, Akke Vellinga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>National Action Plans (NAPs) aim to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) understanding and awareness but struggle to translate targets into clinically relevant guidance for general practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and map antibiotic use targets in European general practice and explore if and how these targets are linked to NAPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE and SCOPUS, with additional manual searches. The research questions were: What are existing targets for antibiotic use in general practice in the 31 European countries? and How are these targets linked to the NAPs on AMR?. The results are presented narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 reports were included, of which 33 focused on national targets and general practice or linking national and local targets. Reports describe local strategies to achieve targets, such as prescriber feedback, benchmarking systems and financial incentives. However, these reports provide aggregated targets for general practice, such as a percentage reduction of antibiotics prescribed. These targets are set in general, for a specific type of antibiotic, for an amount per number of patients, in defined daily doses or items. None of the reports translate national targets into clinically relevant or practical targets for general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most European countries have an NAP with established targets, but the type and implementation of these targets vary between nations. Translating national targets into daily clinical practice is challenging and often lacks the involvement of prescribers. Aligning national and local targets would enhance coherence and more effectively contribute to improvements in antibiotic use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2430507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2024.2430507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国家行动计划(nap)旨在提高对抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的理解和认识,但难以将目标转化为临床相关的一般实践指南。目的:确定和绘制欧洲全科实践中的抗生素使用靶点,并探索这些靶点是否以及如何与nap相关联。方法:在MEDLINE (OVID)、EMBASE和SCOPUS中进行系统检索,外加人工检索。研究问题是:在31个欧洲国家的一般实践中,抗生素使用的现有目标是什么?以及这些目标与抗菌素耐药性的nap有何联系?结果以叙述的方式呈现。结果:纳入了77份报告,其中33份侧重于国家目标和一般做法,或将国家和地方目标联系起来。报告描述了实现目标的地方战略,如处方者反馈、基准制度和财政激励。然而,这些报告为一般做法提供了总体目标,例如减少抗生素处方的百分比。一般来说,这些目标是针对特定类型的抗生素,针对每个患者的数量,在确定的每日剂量或项目中设定的。没有一份报告将国家目标转化为全科医生的临床相关或实际目标。结论:大多数欧洲国家都有国家行动计划,并确定了目标,但这些目标的类型和实施情况因国家而异。将国家目标转化为日常临床实践具有挑战性,而且往往缺乏处方者的参与。调整国家和地方目标将加强一致性,并更有效地促进改善抗生素的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Setting targets for antibiotic use in general practice in Europe: A scoping review.

Background: National Action Plans (NAPs) aim to address antimicrobial resistance (AMR) understanding and awareness but struggle to translate targets into clinically relevant guidance for general practice.

Objective: To identify and map antibiotic use targets in European general practice and explore if and how these targets are linked to NAPs.

Methods: A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE and SCOPUS, with additional manual searches. The research questions were: What are existing targets for antibiotic use in general practice in the 31 European countries? and How are these targets linked to the NAPs on AMR?. The results are presented narratively.

Results: 77 reports were included, of which 33 focused on national targets and general practice or linking national and local targets. Reports describe local strategies to achieve targets, such as prescriber feedback, benchmarking systems and financial incentives. However, these reports provide aggregated targets for general practice, such as a percentage reduction of antibiotics prescribed. These targets are set in general, for a specific type of antibiotic, for an amount per number of patients, in defined daily doses or items. None of the reports translate national targets into clinically relevant or practical targets for general practitioners.

Conclusion: Most European countries have an NAP with established targets, but the type and implementation of these targets vary between nations. Translating national targets into daily clinical practice is challenging and often lacks the involvement of prescribers. Aligning national and local targets would enhance coherence and more effectively contribute to improvements in antibiotic use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of General Practice
European Journal of General Practice PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The EJGP aims to: foster scientific research in primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice) in Europe stimulate education and debate, relevant for the development of primary care medicine in Europe. Scope The EJGP publishes original research papers, review articles and clinical case reports on all aspects of primary care medicine (family medicine, general practice), providing new knowledge on medical decision-making, healthcare delivery, medical education, and research methodology. Areas covered include primary care epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, non-drug interventions, multi- and comorbidity, palliative care, shared decision making, inter-professional collaboration, quality and safety, training and teaching, and quantitative and qualitative research methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信